>I could have had any girl l wanted in school. Any girl l wanted. You know why l didn't have a girlfriend? Huh? Because there was nobody that l liked. Nobody that l liked. That's the truth. I could have had anybody. There was nobody that l liked, because girls stink. They stink. They're evil. And they're all bad, all of them. They're backstabbers, like you.
>>218625841Buffalo '66 is the greatest film ever made.
>>218625841Based gallo
>>218625957The fact he'll just respond to whoever is so based. Gallo is a man of the people.
GOON GOON GOON
>>218625930Is that Rosanna Arquette in the back?
>>218626423yes it is. most known for her role in Joe Dirt (2001, 91 minutes)
>>218626423Yes.She plays a small but very key role.I'm assuming you haven't seen this film, if you're asking.Go watch it RIGHT AWAY. Watch it tonight/today.I'm even willing to upload it for you right now on a 24 hour upload site if that's what it takes.It is one of the greatest films ever made, probably the best independent film ever made. Also "literally me kino" if you're into that "subgenre". But far more grounded than most. Wihle still have a fairy tale/dreamlike quality, in part contributed to by the rare and extremely difficult to work with film stock that Gallo (the starring lead, writer, director, composer, DP) insisted on using.
>>218626483i also adore this movie, do you have any suggestions for that subgenre
>>218625957King shit.
>>218626559Your mileage may vary.The obvious, more pulp/slop and mainstream/power fantasy shit:>Taxi Driver>Drive>Blade Runner>Blade Runner 2049>Falling Down>Place Beyond the Pines>NightcrawlerLess slop:>The Brown Bunny (Gallo himself)>Good Time>Le Samourai>Only God Forgives>Love Exposure>Under The Silver Lake>Whatever (1999, aka "Extension du domaine de la lutte", dir: Harel)>MandyNone of these truly come close to Buffalo '66 in terms of what it delivers and how well imo, maybe Taxi Driver. But Buffalo '66 doesn't rely on any insane titillating hyper-violence power fantasy stuff or whatever. It's just heartfelt and hyper-sincere in its self-indulgence and how it displays sympathetically unsympathetic vulnerability.
>>218626809nah this is exactly what I meant, thanks. I have seen most of these but i'll check out Whatever and Love Exposureif you like those movies i think Punch Drunk Love is probably tied for the most "literally me" movie.
>>218626559Bleeder (1999)
>>218625841I've seen his peehole
>>218627004Yeah Punch Drunk Love is another one that just didn't come to mind.Love Exposure is great but it's also like 4.5 hours long (6 hours in the super duper director's cut) and batshit insane. But beyond its absurdity, it does have a point.Still, it is very Japanese.Also I COMPLETELY forgot Pusher 1 and especially Pusher 2 (both pre-Drive Refn).And on the subject of Mads Mikkelsen, DRUK.
>>218625986>>218625957Note how he completely avoided the question.
>>218627078oh fuck yeah i loved another round. been meaning to watch the Pusher movies. >>218627023is this the one I saw a clip of with Mads working in a video store rattling off directors?
>>218627174Yes. Refn decided to cast Mads as an autistic loser in several films early on. But it has that "literally me" feel, even if it's only the B plot of the film.
>>218625841good actor, shit everything else. including human being
>>218627078You didn't like Pusher 3?
>>218628002i recognize that nigga
