Paul Thomas Anderson's films have cost studios a net loss of upwards of $20 million dollars (when adjusted for inflation).
>>218634237>20 millionThat's a rounding error
>>218634237thats because society is filled with midwit retards
>>218634278Okay, let's just say "millions" then. Shouldn't a "Best Picture" have actually been profitable? And to have a net loss across your entire career is shameful.
>>218634356>Shouldn't a "Best Picture" have actually been profitable?no lol.however I do love that James Cameron not only makes kino but wins at the game of capitalism for some reason.
>>218634237>>218634356you are genuinely retarded, whatever PTA doesnt make at the box office, his films more than make up for in after-market / as part of the WB catalogue with the prestige that surrounds them boosting how much they can get for them in licensing deals, rentals, etc.you are too stupid to have opinions
>>218634237He's not a draw, brother
It was all worth until he started doing movies for blacks. Now it's over.
>>218634356>shouldnt Avengers or Avatar be considered the best movies since they made the most money?
>>218635043and Best Picture goes to... Zootopia 2!
>>218634237I like saying I’m a fucking idiot in the seymour hoffman voice
>>218634348literally the PTA audience so that must not be true
