[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: im.jpg (295 KB, 1400x700)
295 KB
295 KB JPG
What went wrong?
>>
>>218639527
Nothing, 1 and 3 are great.
>>
Nothing? These are solid movies that still hold their own over a decade later.
>>
>>218639527
Iron Man 1 - was great.

Iron Man 2 - the original plan was to do "Armor Wars" storyline from the comic books . But director was forced to include a bunch of side characters he never wanted because Disney wanted to use IM2 to launch the Avengers. So the entire movie felt bloated

Iron Man 3 - RDJ owed a favor to a director friend. That Director didn't have a job in 10 years. So RDJ said he wouldn't do the movie unless his director friend was hired. That director never read Iron Man comics before and just wanted to do his own thing.
>>
>>218639527
1st movie is alright only the last part is good
2nd unwatchable
3rd is good
>>
>>218639527
social media and shills take over in 2013. And created a false narrative in 2012-2013 about dissney marvel films being good.
>>
>>218639527
>capeshit
kys
>>
Nanotech



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.