>domestically, both are among the top 5 highest grossing movies from the 2000s. They also did extremely well internationallyDid they deserve to be so successful?
>>218668105Yes. They were both perfect films
>>218668105Both very solid sequels that introduced a peak character. And in both instances it’s the later films that did the damage
>>218668322shrek 2 is damn close to perfect but it's weighed down by the endless pop culture references and it's becoming dated in a not-so-good way
>>218668386Dated how? You mean the transvestite lol?Bar that, there's nothing else."Outdated" is irrelevant when the culture that's in-date is stagnant
