[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1749336528107743.jpg (885 KB, 1638x2048)
885 KB
885 KB JPG
We are so back
>>
Scary Mov
>>
>>218671078
woke slop
>>
>>218671078
There was a 5? What was in it?
>>
File: I'm.jpg (17 KB, 360x360)
17 KB
17 KB JPG
toast?
>>
>>218675128
Unless.. you a zombie
>>
>>218675128
unfortunately there’s just no way of ever knowing
>>
did people actually like scary movie 2/3/4 ?
>>
>>218676544
2 sucked ass
3 was absolute kino
4 was decent
>>
https://youtu.be/dn0meN4RI_Q
Might be gud
>>
>>218676605
this, but in reverse
>>
Feels too self referential, like now it's all about being a Scary Movie...movie, instead of a parody of other movies. Lots of memberberry shit, not a fan of the new zoomer actors involved or the current year political shit in the trailer either. I had a bad feeling when that article dropped a while back where they were bragging it would be full of offensive jokes, not because that's a bad thing, but because the original movies were more focused on being funny than being offensive (towards the current retarded politically correct zeitgeist especially).

>>218678901
Seeing Cindy and Brenda looking so old feels bad man.
>>
>>218676544
They're alright
>>
>>218676544
2 is great, it was just confusing at the time because it's not a real sequel. All the dead characters come back to life. Now that the dust has settled people are over it.
3 was a slight tone shift from the first two but that tone shift puts it more in line with Airplane and Naked Gun films, which are generally considered better than Scary Movie films. So unless you're a purist for Scary Movie of all things then 3 is a necessary refresher for the franchise. The movies they parody in 3 were significantly bigger than the movies they parodied in 2 (excluding Exorcist).
4 had a lot of good moments but rubbed people the wrong way by having so few of the recurring characters. 3 at least made an effort to preserve the franchise's urban roots but 4 is effectively a white movie for white people. Now that the fatigue has settled this isn't as much of a complaint as it used to be so people are able to appreciate it more.
5 is forgettable and had to compete with A Haunted House but even that had a couple of good gags. I liked how they blatantly used a model set and toy car anytime characters changed locations. AHH is a little bit funnier but its tone is too mean for Scary Movie. Compare the commitment girl getting raped in SM2 to the main character getting raped in AHH and you'll see what I mean. SM5 nails the tone it just flubs too many jokes.
>>
>>218679440
>urban roots
Just call it a nigger movie for niggers
>>
>>218671078
I like that it's copying Scream 7 by bringing back all the characters from the first movie and doing a bunch of nostalgia bait
>>
Will Ghostface have more ill rhymes? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r6gHveDLq5Y
>>
>>218671078
what does the secret code say?
>>
>>218679625
Based



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.