More? Surely they mean less?

Grr he did it again

>>218676308
Probably meant less

SAG + AMPAS voters are so easily controlled? When will Hollywood speak up about their collusion with Epstein's clients (Lex Wexner owns many brands that Hollywood literally shilled for!), and their propaganda for YouCrane & Oct 7??

It's almost like anyone can start a website and anyone can publish anything

>the most obnoxious Oscar campaigns of all time belong to this and EEAO
Wow, interesting. I wonder.

>>218676308
if donald trump wasn't born black people would have a self-sustaining colony on mars free of white people keeping them down.

yeah wouldn't it be ideal if one movie just wins all the oscars? who cares about letting lots of movies have a place in the sun just give all the awards to the blackest gayest movie

Michael Jordan should give him the Oscar as a thank you. Maybe a signed copy of Space Jam too.

>>218676308
Crazy that we lived to see the end of cinema, they just definitively solved cinema with Sinners, it's just over, there's no point in even making new films when Sinners exist, it should have won all awards and in fact it should have retroactively won all past awards too that's just how perfect it is

>>218676403
>>218676473
No, they mean that OBAA won because of anti-ICE sentiment. If Kamala were president blacks would still be at the top of the victimhood hierarchy.

File: Screenshot 2026-03-18 155610.png (334 KB, 1055x1419)

334 KB PNG

>>218676931

File: Screenshot 2026-03-18 155657.png (335 KB, 1077x1327)

335 KB PNG

>>218676986

File: Screenshot 2026-03-18 155740.png (273 KB, 1108x1073)

273 KB PNG

>>218677022

File: 1365359154683.png (325 KB, 382x417)

325 KB PNG

>>218676308
Would it?

>>218676986
Is this a satirical work?