>bro nuclear power is sa-AACK!!
Oh no, 1 person died and a handful of others had a slightly higher risk of cancer.
>>218696826Leftists cerebrate the three (3) nuclear accidents they can get because they hate the idea of people having electricity at all and want to lower global standards of living.
Godzilla but real-life
>>218696995The whole of pacific ocean is poisoned lol. Yes I'm pro-nuclear power plants. >>218697227Japan has a habit of making real life disasters into films, for "closure" and with wrist slaps for the corporate/offcials who screwed up.
>highest recorded earthquake in japan>big ass tsunami >still think it was a nuclear problem
>>218697404Maybe don't build a nuclear reactor near the fucking ocean
>>218697419Why? It was promptly and responsibly dealt with and had minimal issues.
>>218696826When the oil runs out you're going to be begging for nuclear
>>218696826Renewablefag propaganda
>>218697419>Maybe don't build a nuclear reactor near the fucking oceanDon't build it at all. Too expensive.>>218697463We've got centuries of coal reserves in the US.
>>218697564>We've got centuries of coal reserves in the US.how accessible is it?can it be extracted on an industrial scale? at what price?can it be processed, transported and sold for a profit?if the answer to those questions is yes, then they would already be mining that shit.we will never run out of coal or oil, true. but most deposits are simply too tedious and expensive to extract, which makes it unprofitable to bother.and a price of 200 dollar/barrel that would make it profitable will drive consumers even harder into alternative markets and fuel sources. fossil fuels already peaked.there will always be coal and oil in the ground, but it will simply be too expensive to get it. theoretical reserves in the ground are a pointless metric. theres also a billion metric tons of diamonds inside earths mantle, but no way to extract it.
>>218697822>how accessible is it?>can it be extracted on an industrial scale? at what price?>can it be processed, transported and sold for a profit?>if the answer to those questions is yes, then they would already be mining that shit.Well the answer to all those questions is indeed yes
>>218697419that wasnt the problemthey chepaed out and built the backup generator in the wrong spot (below sea level) instead of somewhere high because moneyno, the country that came up with the word TSUNAMI didnt think it would be a bad idea
>>218697564>We've got centuries of coal reserves in the USNo, you don't. There were 3 large coal mining companies left in the US something like 15 years ago. Two shut down. The last one actually still going said it was now akin to an earth moving operation rather coal mining. Its gone
the fact that retarded slavs conducted combined arms warfare in a vicinity of three different nuclear power plants and it didn't cause a single disaster says it all about nuclear safety
>>218699667i mean they built that shitthey know what kind of punishment it can take
why are progressives against nuclear power, it's literally infinite.worried about the waste? just bury it deep in the earth, unmarked, seal it in concrete. There's virtually zero chance of someone stumbling into it 100 years from now.
A Jap teen I know that was sorta e-famous a decade ago for plopping her huge tits out on periscope was from Fukushima. I always wondered if the lingering radiation plumped those puppies up.
>>218699406They're still loading coal trains at gigantic mines in Wyoming and even if you were right that doesn't make the coal in the ground disappearhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Mines_in_Wyoming
