why didn't they include the fifth hobbit in the movie?
There is no fifth hobbit
Tom Bombadil wasn't a hobbit
>>218700644The world wasn’t ready for Bigger Frodo. Still isn’t.
>There is no fifth hob-ACK!
>>218700663Yeah there was. The fatty that babysits Maura's new house to make it look lived in so as to prolong his incognitus as he makes for the Prancing Pony Club with Banazîr, Kalimac, and Razanur. Everyone knows that.>>218700644My guess is that he was extraneous enough to the story that his narrative function could be subsumed into other characters where not simply omitted altogether for the purposes of a more mass-audience-friendly movie-going experience. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rMT90MJEWXM
Fatty bolger? They left him in buckland early in book 1.
>>218700811More like Cuckland. He's the Pete Best of the Shire.
>>218700727There is no fifth hobbit
>>218700644THERE ARE FOUR HOBBITS
>>218700727this implies there are at least seven to eight hobbits
>>218701046There were tens of thousands of kuduks in the Sûza.
>>218700837Who?
>>218701191The drummer for the Beatles before Richard Starkey. Bottom right in that photo.
>>218701210>Richard StarkeyPaul, John, George and Ringo....who the fuck is Richard?
>>218701035Fatty Bolger was getting his Ozempic shot. He missed his flight.
>>218700644Because it wouldn't have made any sense introducing a character that was only going to be in a few scenes.
>>218701239>Ringo Starr>Richard Starkey
