there are no hot scenes in Wuthering Heightwaste of time
>>218932913From what I've heard the book has literally nothing to do with sex, why would you butcher that?
>>218932953The Victorian prudishness present in much of the "Western canon" can be a bit annoying at times.
>>218933012So true we should all read smut instead. Literature is so much better today
>>218933142That's not what I said, and you know it.
The trailer had some hot scenes. Bamboozled?
>>218933177I know what kind of man you are
>>218932913>that story>that actressIt was already a waste of time.
>>218934877She's hot wdym
>>218932953Shut up you fackin clean shirt