Opinions on Roger Ebert as a film critic?
>>218946308He was certainly a film critic
>>218946308Kek based cunny enjoyer
>57 harry potter threadsjesus what is hbo's shill budget?
>>218946308>Hermoine's young snatch: FOUR STARS
>>218946308Average 4channer would have said late stages
>>218946308one of the few critics that people remember, that must be worth something
>>218946308Nothing written there is controversial. In a civilized society at least
>>218946538True that
Armond White was right
>>218946308>ahhhhhh a man's predicting that aesthetics might be maintained in the future of a girl's life
>>218946538That's not Emma Watson, it's Lindsay Lohan in a SNL parody. She was only 17 at the time, so still bad to sexualize her (in before "she was only..." Law and Order meme), but if we want to go there, this episode was two months before Lindsay's 18th birthday, where as most of Chamber of Secrets filming was when Emma was still 11.
>>218947165>Captain autism to the rescueThe SNL skit was a joke about Emma Watson’s 13 year old breasts in Prisoner of Azkaban just fyi
more like hebert lmao
FIVE BILLION GORILLION POINTS TO GRYFFINDOR
>>218946466I've never watched hally podder nor read any of the books, but if this is a corporate scheme, I hope it defeats the absolutely faggoted ryan gosling dogshit viral marketing that's currently going on.
>>218946308He was 100% right about The Thing
>>218946308Reminder that Roger Ebert was a screenwriter for Russ Meyer's movies
>>218946475kek
>>218947231It wasn't, the joke was that Hermione was hot because she was being played by Lindsey, you were not even 13 back in 2004 so you wouldn't get
If you're going to quote somebody don't quote what you think they implied but what they actually posted, otherwise you're just trolling
>>218946308Damn, I didn't know Ebert was based like that.
>>218948212*get it
I was overjoyed when I heard on /tv/ that this charlatan had finally died, but I was also saddened by the fact that he hadn't suffered that much before deciding that he could insult film criticism no longer. The pain and suffering that he went through is only a fraction of the evil that he inflicted on the millions of cinematically illiterate teenagers. When I found out that the old fart had finally decided to not assault the public with his adolescent approach to art, I pulled off the framed picture of Armond White from my wall, kissed it reverently, and immediately embarked on a Korine marathon. Good riddance, you jawless hack.
>>218946308
>>218948212? The joke was Emma Watson grew tits between movies and looked more adult now
>>218948663No, that's what you read here 22 years later and repeat because you're an easily influenced zoomer who doesn't know better, I actually watched it when it aired
>>218948663But that sketch was more in reaction to Prison if Azkaban, not Chamber of Secrets.
>>218947365He was indeed a based pervert.
>>218948745What the fuck are you talking about? Where would I read about a 2004 SNL sketch? I know why the joke works because I saw Emma’s fucking tits in Prisoner of Azkaban on the big screen and my 10 year old penis twitched.
>>218946308He had some terrible takes back in the day and came across as a smug prick, always shutting Siskel's opinions down, so I say fuck him
>>218948778True. But everyone could see how pretty she was. If anything his language was crass but that’s how internet people spoke back then
>>218947240I get it!
>>218948778It's not a reaction or comment about the movies, it's a joke, a what if scenario designed around the guest star, who was hot and almost 18 at the time and wanted to show it.
>>218948947 the sketch explicitly is about how much she grew between movies anon…
>>218948864You must have been watching a different movie because I'm yet to see her develop tits
>>218949047you can watch it on YouTube.
>>218949014The sketch is about Lindsey Lohan, not Emma Watson, they are commenting on her via her character which just so happens to be originally played by another child actress at the time
>>218946308He was right so who cares
>>218948663Her tits were tiny. I don't think that was the joke.
>>218946308This was back when it was culturally acceptable to openly sexualize 15 year olds and count down the days until they turned 18. Saying a 12 year old girl will soon be a hot teen was nothing
>>218949267Early stages of babehood implies she's hot already.
>>218949182>>218949240Autism
>>218949343She was
>>218949267To quote our president “I’ll be married to her in 10 years “
>>218947165>She was only 17 at the time, so still bad to sexualize herfeminist brainrot
>>218946308He loved the movie “Pretty Baby” where Brooke Shields did full front/back nudity at 11 and the plot is about her happily getting railed all day.
>>218946308lmao, at first I thought it was one of the latter movies, but then I checked and it was just the second. Watson was only 11 during most of the filming.
>>218946308Perhaps I was wrong about ol’ jawless Roger…
>>218949267A lot of high fashion models were around 13 or 14 back in those days. It was a debate/point of interest/topic in popular culture for awhile. House did a whole episode and Law & Order did a few as well>Briscoe and Curtis interviewing the model and she says she needs to go to class and they ask if she goes to NYU or what >”dude I’m in 8th grade”
>>218949534>>218949571patrician taste. 11 truly is a peak age.
>>218949182It can't be both? Lindsay Lohan first came onto the public sphere with The Parent Trap, when she was just a little girl. 2004, when this sketch, Prisoner of Azkaban, and Mean Girls all came out, people were noticing her development.
Incredibly based, I will never let foids and their whiteknights take liking hot young snatch away from us
>>218949917In the 90s it was openly accepted teen girls were hot as fuck and now you’re a pedo if the girl is 20
>>218949803I think it was more about Emma. Seeing her go from sexless little girl to teenager sporting tits one movie to the next was pretty jarring. I’m sure I remember my dad making one or two off color comments as we left the theater
>>218949267boomers used to make jokes and comments like this in public all the time.like if somebody had an attractive 11 year old niece saying something like "damn, imagine how hot she will be in a few years" was considered normal.
>>218949534Does she really do full front nudity? I've never seen the movie. Is it really important for the plot? I've read recently that all her naked scenes in Blue Lagoon was a body double.
>>218946308Let’s look at his early life
>>218950173based dad
>>218950218You see her ass and “tits”, can’t remember vag but if it’s there you can’t really see anything anyway because she’s so tiny
>>218950174
>>218949803If Emma was the one who did SNL they wouldn't have done the same sketch, at any age. She's neither the slutty type, nor did she ever wanted to be seen like that. I highly doubt any of the writers were thinking about doing indirect commentary of her "babehood" through Lindsey, it's far more likely they were just adapting a popular franchise to make very direct commentary on their actual guest star's body of work.
>>218948857This script had everything down to a transexual swordfight
>>218946308Based Ebert gave Avatar 1 4/4 stars.
>>218950218you can't really see her vag except in the open matte version when she's getting out of the bath, and that version only exists as a terrible quality tvrip. she has another "full frontal" scene where she kind of half-covers her crotch with her hand and in actuality has a skin-colored patch of fabric there, which the open matte version makes obvious. but her chest and ass do get shown a bunch.also she was already in a playboy-style full frontal nude photoshoot like two years before pretty baby was filmed, pic related. she was 10.
>>218949502Right. How about don't sexualize ANYONE actually. Don't be a pornbrained loser.
>>218948496what courage, staring death in the face without even a jaw and still being like "it is what it is"i know when its my time to go i'll be a total bitch about it
>>218951527He had the money to hire 10/10 hookers to sit on his jawless face, I'm sure he was still able to enjoy life.
>>218950779 peep the new hermione
>>218951450it's abnormal to not have a libido, retard. "sexualization" is not some kind of moral failing but the involuntary reaction of a healthy individual to a potential sexual partner. you've allowed leftist idiocy to make you an eunuch.
>>218951672>it's abnormal to not have a libidolol, wait until you're in your 30s
Roger Ebert should lay off the fatty foods
>>218946308Ebert sucks in general. His film opinions are generic, predictable. That's part of his popularity though: he's sort of the "everyman's" critic. If he likes the film, there's a good chance most viewers will, and if he doesn't, vice versa. That's most of his appeal. He rarely says something truly insightful positive or negative. He is definitely smart, which helps his appeal too. He doesn't leak his politics into his film critiques a lot either, but they show occasionally of course. >>21894630812 is too young to call anyone a "babe."
>>218951727i'm 38. get your hormones checked.
>>218946475What review copy did Roger get?
Now post his American Psycho review.
>>218946466You’re genuinely retarded if you think these threads are “shill” threads. Did you ever stop to think that if it was being artificially pumped that there might be at least some positivity or excitement within said “shill threads?” Talking about a tv show in any way that is brand new and being shoved in everyone’s face on the television board? Even when it’s 99.9% negative? Can’t be organic right, it’s all being SHILLED
>>218947231>>218948663>>218948864Kek what the absolute fuck. Not a single person watched that SNL skit and thought it was in reference to Emma Watson, nor did anyone watch Harry Potter films and thought to themselves "Wow, that Emma Watsons tits sure grew!"It was about Lindsay Lohan and HER growing tits. The joke is that they're pointing out her large tits in a comedic setting by using a story with adolescent charactersI can't imagine how anyone thought this was about Emma Watson.
He meant it in the antiquated sense.Babe as in baby.Because she was as hot like a baby.
>>218952113you don't get a "review copy" when you're roger ebert, 11yo emma watson comes to your house and recites all her lines in the nude
>>218952401it aired immediately after the movie came out why are you poorly attempting to gaslight such an unimportant thing?
>>218946466/tv/ has spent well over 10 years waiting to complain about brown Hermione
>>218952401>nor did anyone watch Harry Potter films and thought to themselves "Wow, that Emma Watsons tits sure grew!"Lol, lmao.
how wrong he and all of us were
>>218952564>"It's "levi-ohhhh-sa" not "levio-saah"'
>>218946308he sux
>>218952806Not a babe but always a cutie
>>218946508His books turned me onto Bunuel, Melville and Kurosawa etc.
>>218951856>he's sort of the "everyman's" critic. If he likes the film, there's a good chance most viewers will, and if he doesn't, vice versa.That is, people who aren't "movie nerds" can count on him 95% of the time to know whether they'll like something they haven't seen. To me, he's off and quite pedestrian more often than not.
>>218952369Your main point is correct I think, but there's that expression "No publicity is bad publicity" or whatever.
>>218952852>now say it again with your legs behind your head, sweetheart, and you'll be getting two thumbs up>u-up what, mr ebert...?
>>218953148lelto me it seems disrespectful to use a thumb
>>218946538Finna shoot my LOAD on those BIG MILKERS
Nothing new.Graham Greene got sued in the 1930s for saying that 20th Century Fox was deliberately sexualizing 9-year old Shirley Temple to appeal to pedophiles.
>>218951295
>>218951596He was married to a black woman at the time he was jawless
>>218951295>>218955487all legal btw
>>218949240big breasted slut
>>218946475>>218946538Speaking of her i saw someone on a deviantart post say this.Try looking the scene in the 1st Harry Potter movie when Emma Watson and the 2 boys are in the room with the 3 head dog. For a few seconds you see up her skirt. She is wearing light blue tights. At about 1hr55min the scene is. The view is very quick
>>218958021Oh yeah, good deal, let me just go get my time machine!
>>218951295I was looking for this tidbit and fact, thank you I can now die knowing its meh at best
>>218946396Fuck yes.
>>218947165You are literally the meme
>>218959845to each their own. i bate to those frequently
>>218946308>My Name is Bruce review>So uh... the video game Evil Dead Regeneration has a higher rating on IMDB than any of his movies....am I right guys?moron.
>>218946308Emma Watson as Hermione is a quite a luscious little lass. wtf Roger!
>>218949267yepzoomers are so mindbroken they can not fathom this however
>>218958641
>>218949240>TinyAnon, those are HUGE.
>>218949917Keep fighting the good fight.
>>218958641Next you'll tell us that you can see Hershlag's nipples in Leon.
>>218947165>She was only 17 at the time, so still bad to sexualize herWhy? Explain. The minute she turns 18, it is suddenly OK?>where as most of Chamber of Secrets filming was when Emma was still 11.The writer in the OP is not sexualising Emma.
>>218949343Babe is not being used here to imply hotness or sexuality, but youth and childness.
>>218952803You would maybe have an argument if her tits grew like Ariel Winters.Emma has small tits, they are nothing to write home about or notice. Most teenage girls have tits that size at that age.
>>218965949You would maybe have an argument if you were alive when Prizoner of Azkaban released
>>218965878them he wouldn't have said early stages, you dumb fuck
>>218966026I saw it in theatres, it was nothing special retard. Have you ever seen a 14-year-old girl before, anon?>>218966429An 11-year-old is in the early stages of youth.
>lives to be 100 with his mandible intactGene won.
