Is he the interview GOAT?
Absolutely not. Told Alfred Hitchcock to his face that he didn't like puns and when Hitchcock responded that puns are the highest form of literature he immediately fucking crumbled and caved.
>>219165224He did thousands of interviews, one mistake does not dethrone him.
>>219165196Larry King and Tom Snyder were better
>>219165196That's not Conan.
>>219165196I don't know but I find voice to be pleasant to listen to, I haven't heard his his interviews in a while.
>>219165429lol
Imagine watching that clip of Gore Vidal and Norman Mailer and coming away not thinking Vidal is a smug piece of shit.
>>219165886Mailer was a provacatuer and pretending you aren't gotten to is the worst thing you can do.
>>219165886Yes, but Mailer was a violent scumbag piece of garbage.
>>219165196He was real good but I've seen better interviewers. I certainly like the format of his show more than any other
>>219165196I like his calm demeanor, and that sometimes he asks really probing questions. However he is not funny, and whenever he tries to make a joke or monologue at the start of the show it usually falls flat.I wish we had shows like this today but the only place you get them is podcasts and I dont really care about those
not a big deal:https://youtu.be/gu5g86nhWK4not a big deal:cavett all over the epstein files https://jmail.world/search?q=cavettbig-ass deal:cavett is a great close-up magician, he's clearly practiced for decades
>>219165224based pun enjoyer
Whenever he interviewed a black man things went off the rails. What the fuck was he smoking when he was with Eddie Murphy or Richard Pryor. Hooooly.
>>219168572>are you offended by the word NYUGGUURR
