The fact that so many films are still needed to make a simple biopic about "the greatest or most significant or most influential rock band ever" only tells you how far music biopics still are from becoming a serious cinematic genre.
>>219172540Elvis > The Beatles
(not true, by the way)
>>219172540They're cheap to make and make money because boomers like them and remember back to a time when the US had music and a culture and not just freaks screaming at each other on tiktok all day.If they stopped making money, they'd stop being made.
these projects are so late to the party that anyone who's heard of the performer is dead before the film gets released
>>219172540Biopics are genuine shitThe Napoleon biopic was straight up slander made by a mad retard who hates Napoleon due to being a liberal faggot with a dildo up his assThe Freddy Mercury one has him be a nancyboy who gets pegged by womenModern writers should be fired and then fired on
>>219172540The problem is they, at least musical biopics, have been completed. The Doors and Walk the Line are the genres peak.
Predict these films' names>Ringo>Paul>John>George
>>219174685>Fag>Queer>Homo>Homosexual
>>219172540Will lose $100,000,000 each.I love watching Hollywood die.
>>219174685>Granny>Bigger than Jesus>Transindian>Pete Worst
>>219174685>Rock Starr>Yesterday>Imagine>End of the Line
Why do the Beatles make millennials seethe so much?
I listened to Revolver last week and it sucked. I only listened to like three songs because it was awful.
