>And there hasn’t been much writing about Interstellar in such an expansive, imaginative way; I’ve yet to see a single review that invokes Borges, J.G. Ballard, or Yayoi Kusama. I’ve read little examination of its playing with the imagery & icons of the reconstruction of American frontier and explorer myth. And I’ve read nothing on the film’s representation of atemporality, perhaps the defining modality of the 21st century, brilliantly explained by Bruce Sterling here.>Most of all I’m surprised to see little appreciation for the meta implications embedded within of filmmaking and the act of viewing a film (and I really get to use the word film, as it was a production shot & lovingly projected on film). Or its obvious debt to Chris Marker’s La Jetée, surely territory that film critics would be staking out.https://medium.com/@somebadideas/on-interstellar-love-time-and-the-limitless-prison-of-our-cosmos-ef59ee28fd8e
>>219205178>dude love is the one thing we're capable of perceiving that transcends dimensions of time and spaceNolan is a hack
>>219205202fpbp
>>219205178I like the movie for the most part but this is one of the most blatantly and aggressively homosexual statements I've ever seen in my life.There is no way the guy that wrote that doesn't suck cocks for pleasure.
>>219205178holy shit, you fags are still seething that we hate your gay little reddit movie? rent free bitch>>219205202>>219205389based
>>219205178>BorgesNot in the movie>BallardNope>ching chongWho
>>219206395>Not in the movieThe tesseract is a reference to Borges infinite library. You're an idiot.
>>219205202Midwits don’t really fundamentally understand any form of creative medium. They don’t partake in an aesthetic experience or an artistic reality but just a story. Plotholes matter more than what emotions and themes are evoked. They throw a fit whenever sentimentality is combined with realism in any way because years of cringe millennial pseudo nihilism shit weaned them on the idea that “realistic” things have to be stark and empty and morose. They also place a lot of stock in sticking rigidly to certain dogmas and so when you introduce some sort of metaphysics or emotional element that instantly infringes on the “science and facts” scheme of ideas in their head, it creates a dissonance because they need rigid sets of ideas for what constitutes realistic or not realistic. Add to that midwit insecurity and needing to vociferously assert when they feel they are smarter than the content they consume, and you have the reaction to this movie. I don’t even like it that much myself but it’s a good insight into the mind of a redditor.
>>219207590Exactly and it's the exact same crowd which cheerleads empty movies like project hail mary.
