is this fat HACK actually right?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NaiUqMP8uZU
Not watching your video, but he's fat and therefore objectively wrong
>>219216304turn your monitor on lmaooooooo
>>219216081Yes
>>219216081Well now it's his turn to write two failure adaptations. And he won't have any excuses.
>>219216081>>219216304Summary: Why Adaptations FailSoul vs. Literalism: Sanderson argues that a good adaptation preserves the "soul" and emotional core of the story rather than trying to copy the book beat-by-beat.The "Showing" Problem: He cites The Golden Compass as a failure because it tried to fit too much in, forcing the film to "tell" (through exposition) instead of "show" the story.Narrative Focus: Successful adaptations, like the later Harry Potter films or The Lord of the Rings, streamline the plot and focus on a central theme or character arc to fit the constraints of cinema.Mistborn Strategy: For his own Mistborn adaptation, he is focusing specifically on Vin’s journey to ensure a tight, cinematic narrative that works for a movie audience.
>>219217629thanks GPT, now give me a recipe for chicken alfredo
>>219217629Summary: No I will not be reading your post.
>>219216081>when adapting to a different medium, some changes need to be made>show don't tellWhat a refreshing and brave take.
>>219216081this guy is literally the nolan of books, absolute slop for retards
