>80s/90s movie is given a modern day reboot>Immediately notice how horrible the color palette of the reboot is to the original
>>219221067Chemtrails changing the composition of the atmosphere and affecting light refraction through it. We haven't actually changed how we shoot film.
Audiences want the marvel look. Audiences want the plot verbally rehashed so they can follow along while on their phones.This state of affairs is the audience's fault.
>>219221067that has more to do with the fact that it's shot digitally. film has a warmer grainy tone to it. also it should literally be illegal to shoot any period piece before ~2000 in digital
>>219221067>90s movie>>character gets the girl at the end and possibly has a kid with her>legacy sequel>she gets killed offscreen before the start of the sequel to reset the character
Why would you waste your time watching this slop in the first placelife is short
>>219221296This and the Naked Gun reboot were both pretty good.
Audiences think lack of color = le serious and mature, therefore nothing is allowed to be colorful ever again
>>219221296why would you waste your time posting on a gambonese backgammon forum for 14 hours/day? life is short
>>219221248Why the fuck would they kill her off when the actress is still alive, still acting, still looks great, and was willing to star in their shitty sequel at a reasonable price?
>>219221067film vs digital
>>219221296I was a big Adam Sandler fan as a kid. Had all his comedy albums, went to see all his movies. This was the first Sander movie I had seen in two decades. Was shocked how bad it was.
>>219222413frat pack is dead. there hasn't been any good comedies in the past 15 years. the best we can hope for is them reminiscing about the good ol days on podcasts.
>>219221248Paul Blart 2
>>219222413I didn't think it was that bad. It could have been better without the sons and all of the celebrity guest appearances. The only ones that were ok, was getting all the pro golfers.
