“It definitely made me aware that simply existing as a woman in that space is something that people comment on,” Alcock recently told Vanity Fair of what she learned from working on the Game of Thrones prequel series. “We have become very comfortable having this weird ownership of women’s bodies. I can’t really stop them. I can only be myself.” She seems to have trouble dealing with all the intense sexualized male attention for her roles. How does Alysa Liu deal with this so easily but she seems to be losing it? Will this anxiety impact her career, people like her because she is cute.
>>219221614monke
>>219221614She monke
>>219221614>“We have become very comfortable having this weird ownership of women’s bodies.I...I can own her body?
deflecting from the criticism that no one wants female capeshit, has nothing to do with her body
How much to buy a cute monke?
>>219221614My tongue, Milly Alcock's arsehole
>>219221614This is what happens when your mother drinks during the pregnancy...someone like alcock is bornWho tf did she think was gonna see her superhero capeshit movie? Women?Is she a special kind of retard??
Monke throwing shit at her haters
>>219221614Will Poulter lookin ass bitch.
>>219222071Perfection.
>>219221614I can't even tell what these people are saying anymore
milly looks like the takes five at a time
>>219222286don't bother trying, it's all utterly meaningless sludge scraped from a scrapheap of lies. they don't even believe whatever it is they are saying, it's just noise, which is why your brain is filtering it out.
>>219221614she the goat : ]
Why do actresses who become sex symbols sometimes try to reject it?
men are hyper attracted to women's looks and like to talk about looks. that doesn't imply they have ownership. why do feminists twist this
>>219222738>the movies are made for the male gaze>the articles are made for the female gaze
>>219221772she's referring to the "Game of Thrones prequel series" in this quote tho
>>219222781because they have to play victim 24/7
>>219221614I've seen this small quote many times but not the question which preceded it. Apparently it's from an interview with a Vanity Fair interview but it's locked behind a paywall.This looks to me that likely the interviewer baited her with a ridiculous question as a gotcha so they could get a soundbite out of her to plaster headlines all over the gossip rags. But what she said is not something unreasonable for someone in her position to think. A lot of actresses have gotten intense backlash recently when starring in fandom or franchise roles. What she said is not antagonistic toward fans.>yeah sometimes people are shitty but there's nothing I can really do about it except not give a shitwow what a scandal
>>219223739>It's Vanity Fair's faultis this the damage control for the damage control?
>>219223911No it's your fault chud
>>219224026didn't take long to drop the act, huh shill?
>>219221614What is it with every celebrity seemingly having some form of background in feminist studies and sociology? Oh, they don't, but they talk like they do. It's all buzzwords and essayist rhetoric that is half-baked and more often than not, vague and nonsensical. It's like they're parroting a professor without in any way understanding what was originally said.
