It's 50%

>>219226229
0%.

zero because all answers are wrong fuck off

56%

>>219226229
It is a paradox

File: 1774988792441641.jpg (26 KB, 640x633)

26 KB JPG

>>219226511
Correct. Everything is 50/50, it happens or it doesn't. Every other opinion is midwit cope.

>>219226229
not enough information

The correct answer would be 25% but there are two 25% options, meaning there's a 50% chance you pick one of them

>>219226229
If the answer was one of the listed choices, the answer would be 33%. Choosing one of the three listed choices (25%, 50%, 60%) would result in an incorrect answer, and therefore a 0% chance of being correct. 0% is also not one of the listed choices, therefore this is an invalid question.

>>219227012
But that means the correct answer is 50%, and there is only one option out of four that says 50%, and there's a 25% chance you'll pick that option, which makes the correct answer 25% again, which makes it 50% again and so on. It's inescapable circular logic.

>>219226229
There is no solution. Its not the answer that creates the problem, its the question: if you think its 25% you will be wrong because 50% of the answers are 25%. If you believe that you have 50/50 chance since two of the answers are 25% you are again wrong because 50% (c) you only have 1 in 4 chance of picking option c.

>>219227173
Assume one of the choices is the correct answer, and assume the same configuration, ie - two choices are the same, and then there are two other unique choices. That means your choice is one of three. Now say that one of the choices is 33%, ie - two choices that are 33%, and one that is 40% and one that is 45%, or one choice that is 33% and two that are 40% and one that is 45%. Either way, you still have only three choices to pick from, a 33% chance of picking the right answer.

>>219226229
100% because i wouldn't pick the answer at random i'd pick it due to knowing for a fact that its the correct answer