Sinners was pretty good, the twist was nice, but that's about the only thing good about it. The third act was complete garbage with cliche after cliche, it's like they gave up after the reveal.
It's 50%
>>2192262290%.
zero because all answers are wrong fuck off
56%
>>219226229It is a paradox
>>219226511Correct. Everything is 50/50, it happens or it doesn't. Every other opinion is midwit cope.
>>219226229not enough information
The correct answer would be 25% but there are two 25% options, meaning there's a 50% chance you pick one of them
>>219226229If the answer was one of the listed choices, the answer would be 33%. Choosing one of the three listed choices (25%, 50%, 60%) would result in an incorrect answer, and therefore a 0% chance of being correct. 0% is also not one of the listed choices, therefore this is an invalid question.
>>219227012But that means the correct answer is 50%, and there is only one option out of four that says 50%, and there's a 25% chance you'll pick that option, which makes the correct answer 25% again, which makes it 50% again and so on. It's inescapable circular logic.
>>219226229There is no solution. Its not the answer that creates the problem, its the question: if you think its 25% you will be wrong because 50% of the answers are 25%. If you believe that you have 50/50 chance since two of the answers are 25% you are again wrong because 50% (c) you only have 1 in 4 chance of picking option c.
>>219227173Assume one of the choices is the correct answer, and assume the same configuration, ie - two choices are the same, and then there are two other unique choices. That means your choice is one of three. Now say that one of the choices is 33%, ie - two choices that are 33%, and one that is 40% and one that is 45%, or one choice that is 33% and two that are 40% and one that is 45%. Either way, you still have only three choices to pick from, a 33% chance of picking the right answer.
>>219226229100% because i wouldn't pick the answer at random i'd pick it due to knowing for a fact that its the correct answer
>>219226656 Calling it a paradox is the midwit cop-out. It’s not some galaxy brain unsolvable mystery, it’s just a self-referential question that collapses under consistency.If 25% were correct, there’d effectively be two correct answers, making it 50%. If 50% were correct, only one slot says 50%, so it’s actually 25%. If 60% were correct, there isn’t even a matching structure to justify it. It’s not “deep,” it’s just a broken multiple choice. The real twist is realizing the only consistent value is that none of the listed answers can be correct, which makes the probability 0% - which isn’t listed. That’s the joke.TV board trying to reinvent basic logic puzzles like it’s Nolan’s next script.
>>219231085paradox is the word to describe a logic puzzle that has no solution. You just think it is fancy because you are stupid
>>219231085>it’s just a self-referential question that collapses under consistency.so a paradox...
