>Budget: 60 million>Box office: 30 millionwhy did it flop? i probably would've seen it in theaters if i wasnt so lazy
>>219253703It was a bad movie. The script was bad and the acting was bad.
>>219253703Looks like shit
None of the cast had the charisma, screen presence, or even timing to pull off bantering ww2 commandos.
>>219253703They couldn't knock it off with dem negative waves.
It turned it off about 1/3 of the through because it seemed like ripoff Inglorious Basterds, and I rewatched Inglorious Basterds instead.
>>219253703guy ritchie sucks
>>219253703No one buys the "english are gentlemen and badass" meme anymore. They're inbred cucks.
>>219253703>set in ww2 time>killing nazisOh boy another one of these movies>but wait! its>LE SILLY>LE EPIC EXPLOSIONS>AND BEST OF ALL>THEY ARE HECKIN UN ALIVING NAZI SCUM
>>219253703people don't hate Nazis anymore
>>219253703>why did it flop?All WWII "team of losers" flicks are trying to be The Dirty Dozen, but they don't have Lee Marvin or John Cassavetes. The ones that come close are those that do a decent job of making up for those two guys in the aggregate. These days they don't even try to do that, they just sprinkle a little lee and john in every character and it is fucking awful
>>219253703Eiza is straight box office poison. She is about to stop having any big roles once In the Grey flops fantastically
Never heard of it and it looks like ass.
