>But the response to Alcock in many online corners has been as if the actress went on a militant feminist rant slamming all male fans and threw a massive pity party for herself.>One gripe being made by some fans is that whenever a project isn’t successful and has a female or Black lead — especially titles made by Disney — that those creatively responsible suggest fans were too sexist or racist to appreciate their efforts. But Alcock never even suggested Supergirl would get backlash, only that she expects to get personally objectified and trolled (which … she is).>Others counter that some female action icons in the past have universal acceptance, like Sigourney Weaver in Aliens and Linda Hamilton in Terminator 2. But it’s rather easy to cite legendary performances from decades ago and say: Look how accepting we are.https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-features/supergirl-milly-alcock-backlash-women-franchise-1236553579/
Sit. Down.
>>219281965Can we see this backlash? I've only seen apathy and disinterest.
>>219282063>>219260031
>>219282063It was eerily quiet around this movie and its lead actress until that interview. Just a coincidence i'm sure
>>219281965>Didn't bitch about backlash once
Militant feminism is Very punk rock.
>>219281965>something is shit>people say its shit>"YOU ARE WRONG OMFG PATRIARCHY"tiresome
>>219281965Imagine saying this in an austrailian accent
>>219281965Why the fuck would I care what a convict cunt has to say?
>>219281965i don't care about this movie and want everyone involved in it to die, male and female
>>219281965I hate these bots that share articles ffs
>>219283762
>>219281965Tell her to shut her whore mouth
>>219281965I'm so confused. People praised her for House of Dragons. Even my fucking brother said she was good in it. So what the fuck is she talking about? People are saying Supergirl looks shit because it genuinely looks shit. Not because of her casting but because it looks fucking shit
>>219283873Actors these days are massive fucking pussies and can’t take any criticism without having a bitch fit.
There's this automatic assumption today that a female character should also have a female audience. But the reality is when it comes to Supergirl, She-Hulk, Captain Marvel, Lara Croft, Red Sonja, Darth Talon and so many more the audience and fanbase leans overwhelmingly male. If this type of academic feminist culture war shit in interviews/marketing along with an antagonistic creative approach are what's required to have women, girls and LGBT pay attention and show up then that's not worth it. Even if it were to lead to guaranteed and lasting success (it never does) it's just not acceptable. Too many negative consequences.
>>219281965I would sooner live next door to a negro or an indian than an australian.
>>219281965How have Sweeny and Ortega gotten backlash?
>>219281965>One gripe being made by some fans is that whenever a project isn’t successful and has a female or Black lead — especially titles made by Disney — that those creatively responsible suggest fans were too sexist or racist to appreciate their effortsYes, I dont want naggers on my screen at all, and I don't want annoying women either.
>>219281965Eat the fucking slop shinji.
>>219281965One magacock and it's over for her.
James Gunns never got over being kicked off out of Marvel by based chuds and to this day lets his actors do suicidal shit like this
>>219284272>Ortegahandsomesquidward.jpg>SweeneyI've seen a lot of posts on here and social media calling her mid at best, not to mention the American Eagle thing
>>219284272
>>219282315This post >>219282102 is being eerily ignored. Just a coincidence I'm sure
>>219284272>SweenyMadame Web maybe? >Ortega People love her, idk.
>>219281965Oh noes, not the ironic backlash! Darn those dastardly chuds!
>>219284590We didn’t make that trailer now did we faggot?
>>219283568>militant feminismAll she said is that being a woman in a male-dominated genre will likely result in her looks being picked apart which they have been since she was first announced as Supergirl, as evidenced here >>219282102
>>219281965It was a Kafka trap all along, desperately trying to drum up any kind of attention for a film nobody asked for. If you can't get hype, get hate. Anything to get eyes on the product.
>>219284555No one outside of this board has ever seen the squidward ortega
>>219284637>says her looks will be picked apart by the internet>her looks get picked apart by the internet, here's an example>"well we didn't make the trailer that made her look ugly!"
>>219284590I mean she/they kicked the hornet's nest. You're going to get stung at that point. Nothing more to say
>>219284676Wrong, I've seen it on posts about her on social media. Also this cesspool does influence the rest of the internet.
>>219284727How? People have been calling her ugly since the very first picture, she commented on that...the hornets were already stinging her, all she said was 'the hornets are stinging me' and the hornets got pissed about it
>rachel zeglerThanks for me reminding me of that freak
>>219284716>"well we didn't make the trailer that made her look ugly!"Yes that’s correct faggot. If they didn’t want this to happen they shouldn’t have put in unflattering images front and center in the trailer. Not hard to understand.
Waiting for that one guy who spammed Rachel Ziegler for months to jump on this
>>219284813This is exactly what she's talking about, it's an action movie not a pornography so she's not going to look glamorous in every single shot and people are giving her shit for not looking glamorous in every shot that they wouldn't be giving Keanu Reeves or Bruce Willis. You're literally proving her right you absolute retard.
>>219284272They didn't, it's just trash """journalism""" mixing bullshit to generate outrage and make noise for a movie nobody cares about it.Also that kike from Anora basically did a porn movie and not won an Oscar but also never got an iota of criticism from either the left or the right. Weird innit?
>>219284787If the expectation here is zero negative comments then that's literally never going to happen. I haven't seen a meaningful amount of negativity towards the DC casting choices in general. Most of it has been aimed at Gunn himself along with writers like Tom King, etc.
>>219284272Syd got massive backlash for the whole "good jeans" thing and not groveling to a wokie in that one interview she didJenna they've been trying to cancel in a couple ways. She refused to say a line of dialogue because she felt Wednesday wouldn't say it which ENRAGED hollywood writers.
>it's the audiences fault out multi million dollar CG slop written by chatgpt is badA bold strategy cotten, let's see if it pays off this time.
If it does fail I take it we are going to get the 'men did not support it' card played, and no point made about women never going out to watch this stuff? Am I meant to believe all these strong independent women are being held back by this mythical horde of total loser incels that are actually super powerful as to stop women supporting stuff?
>>219284863Ok pay attention faggot, because this is the last time I’m going to explain this to your stupid ass. When you make a trailer, you put your best foot forward and make everything look as good as possible and that includes the actors. It’s not our fault that whoever made the trailer decided to put in a scene with her having derp face.
