Which type of movie enjoyer are you?
I don't rate movies
>>219319715This
>>219319715This kind.
reddit cat
>>219319687I am incapable of picking a movie to watch. Which of these kinos should I watch?NightCrawler (2014)Hook (1991)Ransom (1996)The Brutalist (2024)21 (2008)Only God Forgives (2013)Killing Them Softly (2012)Stargate (1994)War of the Worlds (2005)JFK (1991)
>>219319687>watching movies or tvLOL
>>219319774JFK or Hook. Both are kino.
>>219319774Most are pretty good, watch only god forgives if you're a big fan of refn otherwise skip it
>>219319780>troonie meltie this quickwelp
>>219319687Both, at times.
>>219319715I don't even know a fucking Jew who'd have the balls to say that. Let me get this straight: you don't ever rate?
>>219319774>NightCrawler (2014)obviously
1 star - so bad I regret watching it2 stars - mostly bad3 stars - decent3.5 stars - good4 stars - great4.5 stars - exceptional5 stars - masterpiece
>>219319745Which one
>>219319907Nightcrawler is one of those 4chan movies that I can’t get onboard with. I’ve watched it twice and think it sucks.
>>219319687It entirely depends on the movie, if i watch something like Puss in Boots 2, i'm looking for fun, not for thematic nuance that challenges me as a viewer.
>>219320087Oops, meant for >>219319905
>>219319687which one are you and what type of films do you enjoy
>>219320097>When you ask a friend if Hellboy is any good, you're not asking if it's any good compared to Mystic River, you're asking if it's any good compared to The Punisher. And my answer would be, on a scale of one to four, if Superman is four, then Hellboy is three and The Punisher is two. In the same way, if American Beauty gets four stars, then The United States of Leland clocks in at about two.Roger Ebert had plenty of bad takes, but I agree with this approach to film criticism.
>>219319745>reddit cat
>>219320151I wish I could erase hylic from 4chan’s collective vocabulary along with phenotype and dysgenic.
>>219320207dysgenic hylic detected
>>219320207what phenotype is a person who makes a post like this
>>219320229>>219320267You joke, but it’s a large reason 4chan became filled with insufferable fart sniffers acting superior on 4chan of all places.
>>219319774Killing Them Softly is shit just look up the Gandalfini scenes
>>219319687I only rate anime because it's very easy to.For movies I write a couple of things that stuck with me about the movie and then heart it if I liked it.
>>219320326>I only rate anime because it's very easy to.yeah like half a star because theyre all so annoying and cringe
>>219319687both
>>219320368you need to have grown up watching anime to appreciate it.
>>219319687Both.
>>219319687first one
>>219320407i watched one yesterday and it was the faggiest manchild shit ever you have to be a pedo to enjoy some of these
>>219319715I don't watch movies
>>219319687Righ>>219319715ThisI just know instinctively whether it was a good or bad time
>>219319715UNFATHOMABLY based
>>219319687i just watch what i like
>>219319780This is obviously the most /tv/ response.
>>219319715This. In fact I can't really even do it. I also cannot weigh different types of movies against each other because it feels retarded to do so. I like movies for different reasons
>>219319687you didn't have funyou had fake fun
>>219319687started out as the pretend left and now i am right, my favorite movie last year and the movie i had the most fun with was minecraft and my favorite character was garbage man.
>>219319687Letterboxd is a website for women
>>219319715Fippy bippy same
>>219322111I’ve met people like you IRL, I think this is an inability to think critically. They can only say “I like it” or “it was stupid/boring”. It strains their brain too much to evaluate it further than that
>>219319715>>219321898>>219321931>>219322111>>219322953Brainlets lmao even a normal toddler can put a number on something
>>219322973retard that's not what I'm saying. If anything critical thinking is what prohibits me to arbitrarily compare and weigh completely different movies against each other, it's so fucking stupid to do so.
>>219323024>He admits he's on the same level as a toddlerdouble lmao
>>219319715Okay.
>>219323025rating/evaluating a movie usually means you’re comparing to comparable movies. like movies within the same style/genre
>>219322973Yeah, theyre like all these vidya people on metacritic that rate games either 0 if they didnt like it or a 10 if they did. Theyre too stupid to actually think about aspects they enjoyed or what they disliked.
>>219319687On the left is me on /tv/On the right is me when actually watching a movie
>>219319715I judge movies but I don’t ever compare them. Comparing Star Wars to Star Trek or Alien to Aliens is just dumb. They are completely different movies with a totally different theme and message. Why would I compare them and decide one is better than the other.
>>219323025see >>219320097>>219320156You dont compare Schindlers List to a movie like Hot Fuzz. You compare it to other WW2 flicks.
>>219319687Would pet the cat on the right
>>219320207for me it's troon, chud, millennial, and zoomer
>>219323202t. unc
>>219319780wtf why did jontron say that
>>219323249we all get tired of these trendy buzzwords on our website sooner or later
>>219323249It’s been very funny to see big bad racist 4chan adopting black speak like this.
>>219319687Enjoyer?
>>219323305you’ll find black guys who often use white words like “affidavit” and “subpoena” even though they hate white people
My rating system>10/10 - Perfect movie (doesn't exist)>9/10 - Great movie>8/10 - Good movie>7/10 - Flawed movie but wasn't bored>6/10 - Major flaws but with redeeming qualities>5/10 and below - Varying degrees of dogshit
>>21932336910s are for your favorite movies
Always always doggo
>>219323367Smooth talking black lawyers are based. 4chan saying 'unc' even ironically legitimately feels like this website is fully now out of touch and irrelevant.
>>219323249t. gramps
>>219323454Another one I see a lot on here is anons referencing @grok. That’s such aging normie social media humor.
>>219323454unc seethe
>>219319687I'm left cat with right hat.
>>219319780based
I have never given movie a perfect score.
>>219323634grok is this true?
>>2193196875/5>fun and has full-frontal female nudity 1/5>is shit has smokingAnything else somewhere betweenBut I got banned off letterboxd for "misogyny" and "slurs" so now my ratings are just for me
>>219322111Movie ratings are materialistic, these people want to measure a soul.
>>219323773I give movies 11/10 to compensate >>219323786I thought rob reiner was dead... /x/????
>>219323807baste
>>219323249zip it jit or you're grounded that means no devices for two (2) weeks
>>219319774Put them on a digital wheel and spin it
>>219319687if you're the second, you end up with a really long list of "ok" movies. I like my 5 star ones to be ones that I really, really loved.
>>219319789Thanks, ended up watching JFK and it was kino.
>>219319774Only God Forgives
>>219320087I like Velvet Buzzsaw better. It wasn't so tryhard.
>>219319774Stargate and Nightcrawler
>>219319687Left. The only "fun" i have is banging shemale prostitutes, like a real man
>>219323112real, all of this is for people who'd feel genuinely personally attacked if you said something they enjoyed was mid in any context, it's just falsely compared to being an actual movie critic even to an amateur level to dissuade away from that fact. ppl can't say they enjoyed something but that it was dogshit or lacked quality as a movie, they have to make the movie a part of their personality. in reality there is no inherent difference between the two in OP picrelhence why you get seething 'stop having fun' memes thrown at you whenever you blogpost -flaming pile of dogshit- isnt great
>>219319687Depends on the movie.Dumb comedy movie? Did it make me laugh or not? Action movie? Did it have me at the edge of my seat? Was the choreography good? Or did someone just throw up a bunch of fight scenes?Serious drama? OK was there actual drama? Stakes? Emotional punches?Thriller? Can I pause the movie after 7 minutes and 28 seconds and predict 85% of the rest of the movie because a 25 second unskippable ad showed up on a YouTube video 6 months ago?
>>219319715What's weird about me is I do log them on letterboxd and I do like or dislike them but I don't rate. I don't see the point
I hate people who rate a movie 1.5, like literally whats the fucking point, might as well not even do it
>>219319687Statistically the 1 star and 5 star reviews are both worse data than the 3 star reviews
>>219319687in the middle of the 2, leaning towards retard cat
>>219319687>>219319715A very organic samefag
>>219322973>>219323070i think the reason people like you spend your time rating movies is because youre not really smart, and evaluating and criticising movies is the only thing youre able to do, so you put all your brain power in doing that. to me, watching a movie is something i do at the end of the day to relax. most of the time i never even finish them. my thought process is simple: if i enjoyed watching the movie, its a good movie. i dont care about how it compares to other movies because thats entirely irrelevant.
>>219323024>>219320156>you're not asking if it's any good compared to Mystic River, you're asking if it's any good compared to The Punisher.no, im asking if its enjoyable enough that i should spend time watching it. why would anyone compare hellboy to punisher? theyre completely different movies. as i said here >>219330676 people who waste their time rating/analyzing movies, video games etc.. is because they have nothing else in their life to challenge them intellectually.
>>219319715I only rate 10 or 110 if I like it1 if I don't like it
>>219319687>>219319715all three here. Yes, I am based.
>>219319687Just like with videogames, if it isn't fun, why do you even watch it / play it?Just be yourself, bro.
>>219319687"fun" just means you aren't smart enough to judge quality. It's always the worst films these faggots find "fun"
>>219323807good post
>>219330676well this is a forum for television & film enthusiasts, but I’m glad you let us know that you don’t really think about it or take it seriously. you seem to be implying that while you’re out being a cool hardworker I’m sitting here rating movies all day but surely know that’s not really the case
>>219319715Absolutely correct. There is no objective numerical frame of reference, and even if there was people aren't beholden to adhere to it at all times. Comparatives (or Ranking) is the best way to get across how much you enjoyed something in as little time as possible. Example: Reservoir Dogs > Fight Club. How many stars does each get? Doesn't matter. Need more information? Better get ready to hear an actual film review then.>>219322111>I also cannot weigh different types of movies against each other because it feels retarded to do so. I like movies for different reasonsYou think you do because you lack the insight to understand what specific aspects of a film you enjoyed and only look at the oeuvre. There's nothing wrong with that, it's just something you need to develop. Trust me, there's joy to be found in being able to watch a flick everyone says is crap and come away with something in it that speaks to you even if the film itself is neither focused upon it nor even aware of what they've managed to do.>>219328810Yeah I do the same thing. Any film that gets a Like from me is something I enjoyed fully and with little to no reservations. There's many flawed films that still get a Like because what they do well they excel in even with other elements dragging down the piece in general.
