>Terrible, yes, but great.
Thankfully the draft will make an adult out of you
>>219374077>R rated harry potterHow much rape?
kino!
>>219374077I always hear this music during this scenehttps://youtu.be/k5hY6JFrqbo?list=PL4040EB25C260C1C9&t=40
These movies fell off hard after the second one
Well, /tv/?
"Not good, not terrible but the wand IS graphite tipped"
>posting satanic trash on easter sundayyou're brown
>>219374185Considering obliviate, which erases memories, isn't one of the forbidden curses, I'm gonna say a lot.
>>219374365> A review by the MoM Experimental Enchantment Safety Board later concluded that the failsafe charm had an inherent design flaw, as while the fully spoken charm would nullify excess magic, the first 3 syllables formed Merlins Magical Magnifier, causing a 900% increase in latent transmogrification energy which, in the already oversaturated field surrounding the wand assembly, led the caster's mouth to become a beak before he could complete the incantation.> Multiple professors involved in the project were aware of the issue but had failed to halt the project out of fear of being calmly spoken to by Dumbledoor.
>>219374586"Told you the design was fucky"
>>219374185Well, Ron's brothers sell date rape drugs on the main street and the concept of using them on some poor muggle for years is executed at least once through the books.
>>219374976Which is fucking hilarious considering their father's day job is investigating misuse of magic on muggles
Criminal, yes, but awesome
>>219374077What the hell did he mean by this? It wasn't in the book.
>>219374077
>>219374077That's already what terrible actually means thoughbeit
>>219374077>Terrible, yes, but gay.
>>219374312Marry, kill, fuck, fuck harder.
>>219374077what was so great about muggle-born genocide?
>>219374586>out of fear of being calmly spoken to by Dumbledoor.Kek.>>219375049I wonder how many times a day the twins obliviate their own father (and sister, but for different reasons).
>Geev it er' Malfoy or ill knock yew off your broom.
>>219378032>but for different reasonsPoor Harry
>>219378114Don't worry, sometimes they fuck him too.
>>219374077Did Dumbledore know the guy selling wands to his students was a fucking chud?
>>219378718you're not ready for that conversation anon . . . I'll give you a hint though, Dumbledore doesn't speak negatively about Voldemort the way others do.
Harry Potter is so fucking ass
>>219379391Harry Potter fucks asses?
>>219374077If Voldemort was so "great", why didn't he just cast himself out of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises? Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.>a-at least the books were good though"No!" The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.
>>219379444Why did Harold Bloom not write his own novels?
