[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_4410.jpg (25 KB, 260x383)
25 KB
25 KB JPG
Why is the original spiderman movie so kino?
>>
>>219428398
1 sucks

2 is the kino one
>>
>>219428398
Whenever there could feasibly be a hot chick in frame, there's at least one hot chick in frame.
>>
>>219428398
At least two reasons. Four if you count the 2nd one.
>>
>>219428398
superhero movies were still new, sam rami had a genuine vision, and he stayed respectful of the source material, even with the slight changes. peter was someone to root for, his problems felt real, and the spectacle was just enough to keep young kids engaged.
>>
>>219428398
It's the scene when Pete calls that one dude a flaming nancy boy faggot.
>>
>>219428398
because they had no idea or not if this would even be successful to warrant a sequel (let alone a franchise), so they focused on making a singularly good film. every superhero movie is unwatchable these days because they all require 70 different movies and tv shows of context to be fully invested. and also, they all suck.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.