Did anyone else think everything looks kinda cheap? Everything looks fake since they are using sets and not real locations like in the movies, even the animals aren't real.
It's a modern production, of course it looks cheap.
>>219431585Wouldn't it be cheaper to film in real locations rather than build sets though? It would look better too
>>219431558>show about the making of a show before the show even comes out>show is just another soulless modern remake to bootWho gives a shit? Who is actually watching this?
>>219431696They don't even build sets most of the time these days, most "sets" are just a bunch of green boxes they film the actors running around so that Gurpreet and Ramshit can make it all up in post.
>>219431696Yes and no. The new issue is getting people to the locations whereas with a set everything is just right there, so it gets the "eh good enough" treatment.
people keep praising how good the animatronics look but they still look like animatronicswhy not use real animals, cant be that fucking hard to train an owl to stay put
execs and producers have no shame with "skimming" most of the budget these days.
>>219431558I thought the sets and animatronics etc looked good, but it doesn't matter because they won't be visible in the show
>>219431877the trouble is they still look like sets and animatronics, even if they're good it wont look as good as using real locations and animals. obivouisly for the magical creatures they needed to use animatronics but for the owls and rats it could've been real
