https://youtu.be/BzKXF0T75psWell /tv/, what do we think?
They are, timmy looks like a weak faggot
>>219434064But /tv/ keeps telling me actors used to be better looking.
>>219434064DEI which is about much more than race, it's about the end of merit and promoting a subversive agenda
>>219434064Boy actors are pretty, girl actors are uglyWhy Come?
>>219434064"supermodel", he's like 5'1" with no jaw.
BUY AN AD, SHILL. I'm not watching your slop essay.
>>219434064"Ugly" had character and tropes. everyone of them was original. everyone today is a carbon copy of retard
>>219434064They don’t seem to be making new character actors
What about that ugly black chick from Spiderman? Or the fatso from the police comedy? Why are the mens looking like supermodels while the women gets uglier?
>>219434123You might be unto something. Looksmaxxing is also subversive. Phenotype > Attractiveness when it comes to looks.
>>219434064is gene hackman considered ugly?
>>219434117/tv/ is right, slick.
>>219435093No, he's just old and bald in that pic.
>>219434064Actors have been ugly for a long time now. This video is retarded.
>Watch a movie from the 70s/80s>Actors are all normal people>Feel more immersed in the film because I can relate to these people more easily>Watch a movie made in the last 20 years>Everyone is a supermodel>Immediately reminded that modern "movies" are just elitist propaganda made with the sole purpose of flaunting how rich and good looking they are compared to me
>>219434064i do not think gene hackman was ugly. he was an average looking guy who happened to be an exemplary actor. i also do not think timothy chandelier is a supermodel. he looks like a feminine twink and i'm not even that taken with his acting.
>>219434064the lack of balding men is the most egregious to me now that I've started losing my hair. It was completely normal to be balding since the dawn of time, but Hollywood and media killed that in less than a decade. Now society is convinced that you must shave your head completely bald the moment you hit norwood 3.there aren't even bald characters (much less balding) in media made after 2000 anymore unless it's their gimmick.
>>219435426Not really
the late 80s and 90s they started casting models as actors more and more where more and it kind of became permanent.
>>219437864Why?
>>219434064They’re all expected to go to the gym even if their characters wouldn’t, if they start losing their hair they do something about it, they probably get their teeth capped as soon as they get a bit of money, then even the famously good looking ones start messing with their faces after a while like Bradley Cooper. Bit by bit they just stop looking like regular people on the street
>>219435748Yeah, every now and then an actor starts losing their hair including the leading men like McConaughey or Chris Evans or Andrew Garfield only for it to mysteriously regenerate. It’s a shame
>>219434064These two are pretty ugly and the girl on the right gets regular main roles
>>219438553I'm extremely attracted to her sexually. We exist.
>>219434064That twink is ugly
>>219435308He was in his early forties
>>219438941Why
>>219439105Just am, I think she looks great, love her face and body.
>>219434064>Why aren't actors ugly anymore?They are. Watch any action film or romantic comedy and tell me with a straight face that the mutt-looking, roundheaded deformities of most hollywood male actors making "duh" faces while the asian/black girlboss flips around kicking badguys look better than any action film star from the 80s, who were all stars of bodybuilding, the romantic shakesperean giants of the 50s and 60s that starred in biblical epics, or shit, ANY of the Bond actors before that faggot homosexual took over. Chalamét is someone normally cast for roles you'd get someone like Alain Delon, young Marlon Brando or Anthony Perkins for the role.The reason why they hired uglier actors in the 70s was either because of two things:1. Industry mindset still stuck/favoring people from the 50s and 60s2. filmmakers feeling like their SERIOUS, GRITTY, HARD EDGE thrillers needed more earthy looking dudes as opposed to heartthrobsAnd that got reversed before the 70s were even over.
>>219439170for me she has a huge swing>ugly w/o makeup>hot w/ makeupi dont get it
>>219438976women disagree
>>219434064YES I'VE BEEN SAYING THIS FOR SO LONG. EVEN OLD PEOPLE CAN'T BE NORMAL LOOKING IN MOVIES NOW.
>>219439677Women like him as they like their gay friend.
>>219439475It's not about bad looks faces so much as just blemishes in general. Wear and tear on their body and a lack of a make-up department with the sole goal of making you look like a doll.
>>219434064>chalamet>supermodelHe's 5' 7" with narrow shoulders. He's a fagit, a twink, a manchild, a runt.
>>219439550Cleans up extremely well.
>>219434064Gene doesn't have a lazy eye unlike the ugly guy on the right
>>219435426Correct >>219435577Which movies are you watching? One uggo after the next in every movie now
>too many hot actors in all movies nowadaysIn which universe are you people living in?
