It really doesn't hold up
>>219451765you don't hold up
>>219451765most 90s shows don't. twin peaks is timeless though.
That's why you watch Supernatural again instead.
>>219451765i spammed most of the series in 2010 and it held up then but it wouldn't be watchable now. i think i like it best as something id occasionally watch a segment of back in 1997 when i was watching seventh heaven regularly
>>2194539437th Heaven good?
>>219454019>It really doesn't hold up
>>219454019
I think it does from season 3 onwards, first 2 seasons are very 90s, the rest sorta exists in its own world.
>>219451765The point of the show was to lust after high school girls. In that respect it most certainly holds up.
>>219454297Man of culture
>>219455191Those 27 year old high school girls
>>219455983Whats your point?
>>219451765That's because it's a drama for teen girls and you're a fat 47 year old childless virgin.
Doesn't hold up against what? Where are these amazing modern shows that mog the old 90s shows? Oh they don't exist? Buffy is better than any tv show from the last 15 years? Then I guess Buffy aged just fine.
>>219451765It looks ugly in modern day because the remaster is shit. Make sure you watch the shitty DVDs in 3:4 instead.
>>219451765Cool opinion, zoomie.
>>219453881And The X-Files have aged pretty well all things considering. Maybe only the first season feel kind of dated
>>219458901mythology episodes sure but most monster of the week episodes were mediocre.
>>219451765It has aged like fine wine. Perfect late 90's and early 2000's show.>>219458901X-Files is one those shows that really show its age and it feels more dated than lot of way older shows.
>>219451765Angel is pretty good.
>>219456037
>>219461699BIG MILKY BOOBS DRIPPING MILK ON MY FACE
>>219457451because other shows are shit, doesnt make your shitty tv show any better.>the last 15 yearsthe 90s were 30 years ago, retard. plenty of shows have come out since then that are much better
>>219458526>>219460841it aged like shit because thats what it always was.
>>219451765Does this?
>>219462223>the 90s were 30 years ago, retard. plenty of shows have come out since then that are much betterlmao imagine actually believing this. Go ahead and list 15 shows from the last 15 years that you think are better than Buffy, so I can laugh at your garbage taste
>>219463124No, shitty lazy porn parody made by someone who watched maybe 2 episodes, with no hot scenes
>>219451765that's weird because it holds my dick up anon
>>219451765>It really doesn't hold upim glad the buffy revival was canceledthe original was too good
