[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Should I read "The Lord of the Rings"
>>
I'm reading The Hobbit.
I wish I could erase my memory of all the films and read the books with a totally clear mind.
You should.
The Hobbit is charming though there are the rare syntactically archaic british sentences that may read/sound as awkward or unnatural to modern folk.
>>
>>219456756
I read The Lord of The Rings years after watching the movies. I had very few memories of the movies but it was a great read regardless. Now I totally understand why teenagers get sucked into this fictional world long after they read it and reached adulthood. Charming is the word.
>>
>>219456636
only if you are a fucking dork
>>
>>219456636
Yes.
>>
>>219456636
It was dreadfully boring
>>
>>219457742

Very low iq. Its not even tough compared to older literature or cormac mccarthy. GoT has more characters and locations
>>
>>219457783
Didn't say it was tough, just boring, the story is only an excuse to show his world building autism and if you don't already care about that it's not engaging at all
>>
>>219456636
depends, do you want to read about trees for hours on end?
>>
File: rohanfeel.png (203 KB, 542x640)
203 KB
203 KB PNG
>>219456636
Yes.
It start slowly and Hobbit-like though.
>>
Why is it so kino when Tolkien write pages after pages describing the landscape or even a single tree but it sucks so much when GRRM does the same with the description of meals and feasts ? This isn't a whataboutism, I genuinely think that Tolkien is better than Martin and I wonder why when they both use over description
>>
>>219463858
Tolkien is a better writer and more influenced by poetry.
>>
I thought FotR was really good. TT was okay but I thought it was a little boring at times, and I got really mad when the ents defeated Saruman entirely off screen. By RoTK though I was just like "I don't know who the fuck any of these characters are please just go back to Frodo".
>>
>>219456636
If you take one more step, will it be the furthest from home you've ever been?
>>
>>219456636
You have my permission, anon.
>>
>>219456636
Listen to an audiobook.
>>
>>219465085
Secondeded

Rob Inglis does all three books and the hobbit and he has a good voice for it
>>
>>219456636
Yes. If you are a human being the idea of actual heroes triumphing over seemingly insurmountable odds will resonate with you. Ideal types that show what it means to be a human in the best sense. That there are ideals that are worth it to strive towards in your life; courage, loyalty, honesty. The films are good but the themes of the story that are in the books are so much better conveyed, so much richer in the writing it's insane. There is still hope for a better world, that is the feeling that remains.
>>
>>219456636
How much do you like trees and rocks? If it's anything below 10/10, no.
>>
>>219456636
It’ll really make you think
>>
>>219456636
Read? No. Just get Andy Serkis to read you all 5 books on your preferred audiobook streamer



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.