Why did he stick around during the hogwarts fight his job was done all he needed to do was lay low and then come out and prove his innocence later
>>219459608he probably didn't think voldy would ever kill him. hubris or something.
>>219459608he had a terminal case of onetis his judgement was heavily impaired
He was trying to protect the students while pretending to be Voldemort’s right hand man. He was willing to lay his life down.
>>219459923His plan with Dumbledore was to own the elder wand so voldermort couldn’t and then make sure potter sacrificed himself in the forest to destroy the last horcrux. All of that was finished why was he waiting around in the boat house
>>219459608He stuck around because the paycheck was just enough to endure the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.>a-at least the books were good though"No!"The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.
aren't you like in your late 30s?
Harry had to think he had to die at that point and Snape was the only who could tell him
>>219460090No?
>>219460444>here Harry take this vial of my memories and go watch them in the holodeck and then kysWas that so hard? He managed to give him the Gryffindor sword why not his memories
>making a thread so you can dump a stale ass copy pasta reply to yourselfyou faggot retards never cease to amaze
>>219460513You're from /v/ and watch trash like fishtank.
He is black, no one would believe him if he claimed innocence
