Exorcist II. It's kinda shitty but I like it. What about you? Putting aside its relationship to 1 and 3.
I've always really liked it. Was actually kind of surprised by it's rep. But I've got to say I get it now. It's got a lot of great performances and it really goes all in on it's style which I really like to see.
>>219462480Linda Blair is pretty good in it, though the pic you post where she tries to act sexy towards Richard Burton's priest comes off as silly.Burton is unfortunately too drunk to give a "good" performance, though he's saved by how good his voice is.
>>219462480Blair is absolutely cute and I have no idea why the film exists except to showcase her cuteness.
I liked that place in Africa they went to. It looked cool.
>>2194622811 is good but a bit boring2 is unwatchable3 is easily the best
>>219462980It exists because Warner thought it couldn't fail and Boorman wanted to make a fantasy movie set in modern times (I feel like this movie is closer to Excalibur that people realize).It's also fantasy because it has almost nothing to do with Christianity despite being an Exorcist movie.>>219462996Yeah the church on the cliff and the mud city. Really inspired.
>>219463043Eh, the movies after 3 are unwatchable because they're boring. 2 is a mess but it is uh definitely memorable.I personally go back on 1 or 3 as my fave (probably 1). I still need to see the workprint Legion cut on my Exorcist 3 blu ray.
