Sean Connery and Thomas Brodie-Sangster were both 34 here. Why are actors aging so much better these days?
>>219465489less smoking
They used to put men on the screen that women would wanna fuck. Now they put men on the screen that THEY wanna fuck.
>>219465489Less smoking, less booze, less charcoal usage, less chemicals being sprayed, more matriarchal societies where boys take after the mother.
>>219465525>>219465566Based>>219465550Cringe
>>219465489They're aren't. You're comparing a man that actually did some living with a twink that hid from the sun
>>219465489Sean Connery was chosen for the specific reason that he looked much older than his age. In Ian Flemmings books, James Bond is in his late 30's, early 40's,So they chose Sean Connery, young enough to do alot of the action scenes without looking geriatric and has the look of a seasoned middled aged man.Lazenby was chosen for the same reason.
>>219465650Lazenby was chosen because the studio got blackmailed into giving hush money to numerous women that Connery was beating up
>>219465489>aging so much betterHow is looking 14 at at age 34 "aging better"?
>>219465759That's gonna be a really rough 45, looking like a postmenopausal woman
>>219465617there's literally nothing wrong with hiding from the sun. why should i ruin my skin for random societal perceptions? i get enough sun to be healthy, thank god for SPF, and I work out three days a week.
>>219465759He's got the same condition Andy Milanokis has but less severe.
>>219465489Low T
>>219465489this is called an anecdote and is not indicative of any actual trend or change in aging in young men
>>219465759Looking younger is always better.
