Honestly? He’s right
It's deep seeded. Seated makes zero sense.
>Irrelevant actor says some woke shit to garner favor amongst hollywood eliteI'm tired of this rerun
>>219504949>freudian psycho babble Or theyre just ugly incels and women are whores
total screenshottranny twitter threads death
>>219504949>keeping fit and healthy alongside making money is LE BAD AND LE EVIL>getting baited by """"manosphere"""dudes who are trolling people>ignoring the fact its little London niggers and Pakis who are causing carnage everywhere
>>219505120>incels >women are whores Do you not see the contradiction here?
>>219505233No because you didn’t reply to me so I don’t see anything
>>219505095>Seated makes zero senseIt means that it is a part of ones psyche that is old and a fundamental part of how one functions.Have all this time you thought that when people use that term that they were mistaken and you saying seeded was correct?Really i get both terms but the established term is deep seated.A synonym would be deep rooted.If you get that in relative to seeded, roots are already grown, well established, a seed is a new thing, ready to sprout. In this case a new idea, where something deeply rooted would be an old idea that is ingrained.
>>219504949>women are whores >making money and keeping fit is goodhow is this """manosphere""" a bad thing or wrong? When the above are literal facts..
>>219505120>Irrelevant actorHe should not be though, he is pretty good and is good in everything i have seen him in.He is in a movie called archive where he is basically acting alone for most of the movie and he does really well.imo underrated actor.
>>219504949First part is true. Second part is false - there are no women around these people beyond fleeting moments of necessary interaction. That’s part of the problem
>>219504949>Oh you're afraid of spiders?>You must actually love them!
>>219504949hes literally right?
I still don't know what the manosphere is or who consumes its content. I'm guessing its Andrew Tate and similar content creators but I dont get exposed to it at all.Is it a more likely to be misandrist psyop?
>>219505397>you don't like gays?>Well actually, you'd love to suck on a obese, hairy old mans asshole!!!
>>219505438Its an old term for people like turd flingin monkey, millenial woes and such...but thats UNC stuff
>>219505397If someone said they were scared of spiders and kept talking about how dangerous spiders are, but also talked about how badly they want a spider and how awful the spiderless male epidemic is, then ya I’d say they secretly love spiders considering they say they want one and seem to constantly think about spiders but are just too much of a pussy to get one
>>219505151if women are whores then why can’t incels get laid
I didn't read the thread but I've noticed that a lot of gen z vs millennial and war of the sexes topics have been pushed more on 4chan lately. Who is behind it and what's the endgame?
>>219505558Because theyre ugly incels
>>219505558You can be promiscuous and still refuse to have intercourse with certain men.
>>219505556No one says they are scared of women, women are one of the least threatening beings on the planet. I would rather face 10 angry women than one angry african hornet.
>>219505438I think you are hitting the nail, its like that retard you mentioned, something I would not even ever know about if it wasnt for retards posting cancer like that here.Anyway its like a bunch of pent up retards having some sort of complaining mind about women. In a similar way that feminism does to men.Its not an organized group of men or a political or social ideology, its just a term uded by faggots like journos to descript the men (who think in a similar way) that have the idea.They would lump it together but i would think it is separate from the MGTOW "movement" which originally was described as a mananist movement (anti feminism) when that is a logical reality and ethos of behaviour after discerning that women have too much benefits in the world compared to men and are not worth seeking after.
>>219504949How would "manosphere" be closely surrounded by "lots of strong women"? Is this a subtle fist bump for women in HR? How do "successful, strong women" still exist in this economy that management is actively dismantling with outsourcing? Bong obsession with "manosphere" talking points is clearly a distraction from administrative policies as the biggest problem facing a population. Theo James stays collecting his checks if he spreads the same distraction agitprop about supposedly powerless men who logically don't impact society like the POLICYMAKERS in charge.
Government-mandated girlfriends when?
>>219505676I’m just drawing out anon’s analogy. And there are indeed men legitimately afraid of asking out women
>>219505438It's a bunch of mostly brown and mixed-race social media personalities giving dating/relationship advice and shilling get-rich-quick schemes to an audience of mostly brown and mixed-race males under 25.>I dont get exposed to it at allBest to keep it that way.
>>219505376>>219506311College would be the main venue in which this dynamic emerges. Women are now getting degrees at higher rates than men, and this applies to every race and ethnic group, in both Europe and the Americas.
>>219504949>eCelebs , podcasters , Twitter celebrities , Instagram influencers
>>219505327If they are whores why do you get zero pussy?
>>219504949>nigh unparalleled giga chadI’m not a manosphere guy, but I don’t think someone like him can comment on what incels are thinking
>>21950543899% of them are basement dwelling autists who need a psychiatrist, really we shouldn't be making documentaries and having public figures comment on them but I guess it's easy clickbait.
>>219505095its deep-seated you absolute retard
>>219504949Ya, that's what it is......
This thread was moved to >>>/b/947851626
