Why did Tiana, the first African American Disney Princess get paired with Prince Naveen, an Indian Prince instead of with a Black guy?
>>2196860091) Naveen is an Indian name
>>2196860882) He comes from "Malkadesh"
>>219686120His mother wears a Sari
>>219686009>let's get them both over with
>>219686009If you want an actual answer and not just an excuse to post your jeet'd collection: it's because all-black pairings tell the audience that it is a movie solely intended for black people. It's the same reason they racebent Ariel but cast a Jew for her love interest. If he was black, too, that would've been an immediate death sentence internationally.Domestically it would've been a dice roll. There's a romance movie featuring the Bridgerton mutt and Lil' Mermaid. In its opening weekend, it grossed less than the Zendaya school shooter movie's second weekend: https://www.the-numbers.com/movie/You-Me-and-Tuscany-(2026) Black Pander is an extreme exception, not the rule.
>>219686009Black guys can never be princes. Only villiains, magical negros, funny side kicks oft blerds, or if theyre feeling courageous the well hung hubby/bf material who fucks the shit out of her and is great but she really likes the non-black guy and goes with him. Look at Disney's portrayal of black male characters.
>>219686009Is this a movie that came out or some fan casting? I legitimately can't tell anymore.Is this the Spain themed Disney movie? Was that Disney?
>>219694780The Princess and the Frog was Disney's last major 2D-animated movie (sorry Pooh). It's over 15 years old now. It was kind of ground-zero for the Idpol nonsense that was to come as the lead being black was a major part of how the press shilled it.
>>219695164They shilled Mulan and Pocahontas the same way.
>>219686009>pojeet used up his life savings of scamming grannies to buy one minute with a girl for social media
>>219694658They can be African princes but there is no way to do an American black since they don’t have royalty and none of them come from royalty.
>>219695865No one in America is a royal. Maybe billionaires or oligarchs are close, but the divine bloodline royalty retardation is not a thing in a functional first world society.
>>219695995>a functional first world society.what does that have to do with the us?
>>219696874Well it was till your..."kind' started flooding in recently.
>>219695164The 2011 Winnie the Pooh movie is the last good thing Disney made. It was all downhill from there.
>>219694002On the other hand, Jet Li had a kiss with Aaliyah in 2000s Romeo Must Die but she was beloved in the Black community back then and Black test audiences chimped out to see her kiss an Asian guy so they cut it.Jet Li was aso 16 years older than Aaliyah who was 23.
>>219694780Nigga the movie came out in 2009
>>219697012spoiler alertThe united sharts was always a third world country masquerading as a first world one
>>219702191Based
>>219695811lol someone's mad
>>219686009Aren't South Asian Indians suppose to be racist? Especially their royalty? Maybe they want to put Black women's lives in danger.
More like NAJEET
>>219706242Exceptions can be made
>>219686009>hot man paired with hot woman for prince and princess roles Who gives a fuck about race bullshit? Attractive people are a race of their own.
>>219686009>>219706914As soon as jeets act, look, and behave like high class white men, then women find them acceptable.
>>219707084>high class That's my point. High class is synonyms with good looking, jeets are generally not good looking so they give low class impression. But it's all semantic language games, being intutively good looking is the only thing that matters.
>>219707184>jeets are generally not good lookingNo single population is really good looking, most people are average. Northern Indians are more likely to be good looking than Southern Indians though, due to the Aryan/Iranian admixture being higher.
>>219707297How do you contradict yourself so quickly
>>219707389>No single population is really good looking>but some people within certain populations are more likely to be good looking than people from other populationsHow is that confusing?
>>219707389He's Indian.
>>219707423Oh so you're assuming Northern Indians and Southern Indians are the same populations, even though you then state one has different genetics than the other
>>219707439Fuck me, anon, did you not have your coffee this morning or are you just ESL? Northern Indians are more likely to be good looking because they have a higher admixture of Aryan/Iranian heritage, compared to Southern Indians. Two distinct classifications of people, one of them more likely to be good looking than the other.
>>219707527So you're saying that one population is good looking than average
>>219707666They are more likely to be good looking, but no single population is really good looking. Exactly what I said here >>219707297 . If you are finding it hard to keep up, either use AI or stay on the brown part of the internet.
>>219695865>>219695995They could have made him a Dahomey prince. These are the KANGZ they're talking about. The ones that sold them to the crackas...
