How the fuck did they pull this off?
I'm surprised the first one is the lowest rated, it's the only decent one. The others are embarrassing.
>>219691715Those ratings should be reversed and 2, 3 and 4 should be much lower.
>>219691715Pull what off? Only the first is good
>>219691715They are all great movies, anybody telling you otherwise is a gay homo
>>2196920393 sucked ass
>>219691715They had fun with it
>>219691762Your opinion is wrong
>>219691715rottentomatoes means nothing anymore.sinners got a 97%.
>>219691994If you look you'll see that all of them are certified fresh.
>>219692447What do you think rottentomatoes is?>>219691715I don't want to sound like a contrarian but I genuinely only enjoyed the first one and then the rest of them were not very good and Chapter 4 was straight up bad. I think I just didn't buy into how wacky it got and how it still wanted to be taken seriously and all the dumb lore.
>>219692441That wasn't an opinion
>>219691715How is 4 the highest rated when it’s by far the worst? Nothing but a lazy mashup of recycled ideas from the first 3
>>219691715>John Wick 4>better than any of the othersDon't listen to critics.
>>219691715The people that watch these movies are retarded. This is hardly a feat. I'm sure most older Marvel movies are all around this score too.
>>219692808I liked 3, I thought the defense of the Continental was fun and I really liked that John Wick superfan guy. 1 is obviously great. 2 and 4 suck, nothing memorable about them. I’m really not looking forward to 5 because they’re obviously out of ideas
>>2196917624 is the best. Only plebs say 1 is best, its got the least action and least impressive direction of action sequences. Also doesnt have the badass assassin character antagonists and supporting characters. Main guy in 1 doesnt have that aura, 4 has Scott Adkins
>>219692166Definitely the weakest
It filled the mindless killing action that has been missing for awhile
>>219691715Shallow thoughtless bread and circuses npc slop for vaxxed retards. All of them.
>>219692447when you realize capeshits get on average 90 percent or higher and classic thrillers sometimes will get as low as 70 you learn RT is extremely flawed, old=bad in their system half the time
>>219691715No clue, personally I didn't care of the first movie that much and have not seen any of the sequels.
>>219691715All of these movies are complete dogshit except for the 1st one
Keanu is so fucking slow in 3 and 4, it's embarrassing that they're still thinking of making 5.
>>219695344it’s the only thing action fans want to see, with a few quips from Laurence Fishbourne here and there.
>>219695266>least action That’s what makes it the best. The action in this franchise really isn’t that great, some of the fight scenes are way too fucking long. Like the one in the catacombs in 2 just fucking drags for what feels like 3 hours. 1’s action scenes are more compact and impactful
>>219691715only the first is actually a good movie. 2nd one is decent. but 3 and 4 have no story at all. 1 has a decent action story.however the fight scenes in all 4 are really good
>>219691715It had fun action, the plot didn't matter at all and it had cool settings. It was just a fun movie with no sociopolitical shit added in.
