Still watching it.There's got to be more to life than on our planet.
>>219712664Oh it's him...Rest in peace Heather O'Rourke.
I don’t like the sounds they make in the trailer so I shan’t be watching.
>>219712664Kingdom of the Crystal Skull erasure
>>219712664there’s probably life out there in the universe but you’ll never meet them unless you defeat climate change
>>219712664>There's got to be more to life than on our planet.why?
>>219712818Some of us just dream for the stars.
>>219712818Statistical probability
>>219713172All you need is 4 1 in 1000 chances for life to be statistically unlikely:Say that the habitability of a planet is 1 in 1000.Say that the chances for chemicals needed for life are present on a planet are 1 in 1000.Say that the chances that multicellular life forms are 1 in 1000.Say that the chances that multicellular life turns into intelligent life are 1 in 1000.That's a 1 in a trillion chance for intelligent life on a planet. There are only 400 billion stars in our solar system.I don't think we're alone in the universe, but in our galaxy? Maybe.Intergalactic travel is possibly unlikely as well.>inb4 but I didn't eat breakfastObviously these chances are just an example. Some will be much lower, some much higher.My point is it's not hard to imagine that there's as few 1-in-1000 chances for life, especially intelligent life, to form.I'm not saying that this IS the case, but it's not as far-fetched as some say.
>>219712664It's crazy how none of those movies are good and only War of the Worlds is even watchable.
>>219712818Prebiotic organic molecules have been found on asteroids and other heavenly bodies.
>>219713234>There are only 400 billion stars in our solar system.Interesting numbers.
>>219712664Time dilation alone says no.
How is this even a diss? How many aliens movies did Carpenter make?
>>219713292Let me guess, leftist "science" told you that?
>>219713234>There are only 400 billion stars in our solar systemi reckon its only 1
>>219713355jesus christ, can you fucking stop thinking about trannies for 5 minutes???
>>219713234>In our solar systemIt's always the midwits who shit out those textwall theories huh
>>219712748how will the box office recover without your mother's cash!?
>>219713567Do you think I literally think that there are 400 billion stars in our solar system, or did I simply mean to type galaxy? Since you're not one of these midwits and have never made a mistake yourself, surely you can tell what people meant to say after an obvious mistake and express yourself clearly?
>>219713417That's what they want you to think
>>219713567>1000 ^ 4 = 1e12 is a "theory"Peak midwit
>>219713663Now call him an incel.
>>219713960You replied, so now he's going to call you brown for the next ten posts.
>>219712818Didn't they already say UFOs are real and of non-human origin?
>>219714174They also say the inflation rate is only 2%.
>>219714235Yes, i believe the first but not the second.
>>219713234Now say the habitability of a planet is 1 in 3 And the chemicals needed for life is 1 in 10How does that change the math?
>>219713234the Fermi "paradox" is a coping mechanism for the mathematical proof staring you in the face of intelligent creation
>>219714431As I said my numbers could be vastly wrong, but say those are the numbers. I don't find it hard to imagine the other chances could be vastly higher and offset them. All I'm saying is it's not hard to imagine the statistics are something like this. That's simply my opinion, and if you think it's hard to imagine the statistics are anywhere close to this I can't change your mind.
>>219712664i dont care about ufo crap. its all lies to get people warmed up for the final rollout of project blue beam.
>>219714641What proof exactly?
I think that deep fascination with space is a boomer and Gen X thing. As far as I'm concerned, it's a cold, dark, airless void with a bunch of rocks and gas floating about. And if there's life out there, we aren't ever gonna come across it.
>>219713960lmao your brown
>>219714666I think you may be an autist>let's imagine something wrong happening to us>ISN'T IT WRONG?Yes nigga "let's imagine the bad numbers and then pity ourself on why it's bad" that's a you problem, I can on the same vein imagine good numbersI don't think you understand the autism you are displaying hereEven more when you pull out 1 in 1000 chance of habitability, when we have 8 planets and 2 of them and 1 satellite are habitable
>>219715303Habitability isn't just about position of the planet. There are possibly other factors making Mars uninhabitable. It's also about the star and stability of the system which you're taking for granted, probably other things I'm forgetting.I'm not saying these are the numbers, I'm not saying feel sorry for us and everything is doom, I'm saying don't discount the possibility that life is extremely rare. Some people think there's no way life isn't everywhere, some get aggressive like you when the possibility is raised that it isn't.I'm just saying it isn't hard to imagine that it's rare. Again, if you think it is hard to imagine I'm not going to convince you. I can see the argument that it's plentiful as well, we don't know. You're literally doing the "but I did have breakfast" thing I predicted in my post.
>>219712664>Make the best movie you've made in 20+ years>Perfectly encapsulates your long storied career>Also the last onscreen performance of your best contemporary >Nobody sees it>Have to go back to making boomer slop for retardsBeing Spielberg must be hell.
>>219716440I get agressive when you make up numbers and then adress your made up conclussion as daunting with nothing to fuel you but your made up numbers really going nowhere>don't discount the possibility that you may get raped tomorrow!>what if you get raped tomorrow?>let's say there's a 10000% certainty that you will get raped tomorrow>let's just say that. Wouldn't that that bad?>number may not be accurate so let's just say the probability is instead 200000%>doesn't matter the numer, lets just say that, lets just take 200000000% chance you'll get raped>isn't that like, a posibility?>i may have some numbers wrong but lets just say it's 130% chance (i'm being conservative lets just say that)>isn't that like a possibility? Lets just say that there is>isn't that something?No
>>219718896Asserting that life is a certainty is just doing the exact same thing. The only tenable position is accepting that either is a possibility. All analogies break down at some point, yours breaks down very easily though. We have crime statistics, there's no census of every star and planet in the galaxy.
>>219718896So do you believe that women should not accept the possibility that they could get raped and take no protective measures because that would be too pessimistic?
>>219719160I have more proof that life exist than you have proof of it not being there>>219719557Women take protective measures based on the expected rape from the area they live inWomen in downtown miami dont act as they were women in central Congo
>>219712664what's up with that filename? lol
>>219720108>>219720108>I have more proof that life exist than you have proof of it not being thereWe have absolutely no proof that life or the conditions for life are not rare in the universe. If you have the proof post it, if not accept that the conditions could be rare is not outside the realm of imagination, or at least accept that you have nothing to get that idea out of people's heads and don't get so upset.
>>219712664these are all very different movies>filename
