What did i think of it?
>>219750904You tell us.
>>219751056I liked the color palette and the main theme
>>219750904>>219751164Best film ever!!>>219751056>someone actually saved my Suspiria-Inserts edit
>>219751392>Why can't I hold all these apples
POST THE XXXXXL SHIRT
>>219751056She's fuckin ugly as shit bro
>>219751419Kek I thought the same exact thing.
>>219751164It's my favorite example of that flamboyant, giallo type horror movie. I agree that the score kicked ass.
Its Cuckslop
>>219751459>>219751482>t. gay schizos
>>219751496Don't project you scared little faggot
>>219751164>I liked the color palette and the main themeBasically the only reason to watch it. Still all horror stories in general are retarded anyway.
>>219751519Scared of what? Some terminally online loser obsessed with another man's t-shirt?
>>219751643Projecting agaaaaaaain you little weakling
SHE'S NOOOT A GIRRRL WHO MISSES MUCH
>>219751459Yeah nah.
>>219752656>Thin lips, giant forehead, flat broad nose, no tits, no ass, narrow hips, hairy arms, general fridge physique.You're gay as Christmas.
>>219752733>>Thin lips, giant forehead, flat broad nose, no tits, no ass, narrow hips, hairy armsEverything you just described is pure sex. Go troll another thread, queermo
>>219752646>i'm acting
>>219751056Depressing titties. Gross
>>219752839I think you might be a pedo
>>219752919I think you might be projecting
>>219750904WITCHwitch witch witch
>>219752971I bet you have pics of that ugly blonde kid from Wednesday on your computer.
Im so tired of incels simps
>>219753024This board and /v/ are fucking dead because of coomers
>>219750904>wow those colors are so vibrant. they sure don't make films like they used to. too bad this movie is boring as fuck and I fell asleep twice during it. and god that soundtrack is grating to my ears
>>219752972kino kino kino
>>219751056Why's she wearing that hat?
>>219754122Because she's a witch.
>>219754931That's a man
:)
>>219750904You enjoyed the Giallo vibes and the kino soundtrack by Goblin?
>>219751566>Still all horror stories in general are retarded anyway.Explain
>>219755110!!
>>219750904They should do Suspiria remake starring Emma Snood.
>>219756733Yes, they should.
>>219755234Not OP but I sure did!
Last one.
>>219757354
>>219751164It's definitely an audiovisual feast, and the sets were impressive, but as a whole I found it to be underwhelming. But I'm not big on giallos desu
>>219750904>>219751482You are both mentally ill and have done a great deal to ruin this board. How many fucking times can you keep posting the same pictures of your preciouses?>>219753095add /mu/ to that list. All dead by waifu.
>>219750904You thought it was shot well and pretty boring like all those giallo movies without super hot European babes. At least that’s what you told me, you scoundrel.
>>219760806I didn't even make this thread, you dumb sperg. Give OP a break.
>>219761515insane drip
Post her wearing the Iowa shirt.
>>219761931Midwestern beauty :)>>219761672absolutely
>>219762426extreme cuteness
>>219755425The premises and decisions in hroro flicks are retarded by nature. Don't start with pseudo horror that are just thrillers.
>>219764563That's not an explanation. You're just repeating what you said before.
>>219762880I never knew it was possible someone could be so cute, yet here she is…
>>219751056>>219752898
>>219750904how pretentious are you
>>219750904>>219760763I haven't seen this but I felt similarly about Inferno. Some amazing looking scenes but ultimately pretty bland otherwise. That underwater room set is one of the best I've ever seen though. It was extremely well executed. I'll never forget it. Worth watching for that alone.
you thought it looked great but the script kinda sucked
>>219765712Such a sad scene in context.>>219765850Inferno is just Argento aping himself after the huge success of Suspiria (he even brought back the same taxi driver lol). I like it but it's certainly no masterpiece.
>>219751056>>219765712dfc
>page 10*hiss*
>>219770451You must be a very boring person
Snoodspiria
Jessica Harper = Mommy Snood
Cum draining sessions with Mommy Harper
You wouldn't have to keep bumping your thread if it wasn't shit.
>>219771909
>>219760806It's one retard.
>>219771984>>219772517I already said this isn't my thread, dummy. 4chan's current clusterfuckery has prevented me from posting ITT since this morning anyways. It hasn't been this bad since last April.
>>219772948You have a very empty life.
>>219773014You wish!
>>219751056jeff the killer-core
>>219771802>>21977229980s Jess was so cute!! She was definitely rocking the Kate Bush cut around '85 back when it was a thing.>>219771909Did you know she was dating the director of Inserts at the time?
>>219750904Kino
>>219752972ssssssssnake
Argento is a hack.
>>219773475They posted the shitty remake thoughbeit
>>219750904I really liked it, personally. Immaculate vibes, and I can appreciate a simple story with good presentation. The somewhat trippy nature of some scenes enhances the pretty fairy tale nature of the story.
>>219750904>>219751056i knew a girl in high school that looked like her man she was so hot and cool its a shame i was a total antisocial autist retard and i never even tried anything with her. we spoke a few times and she was super nice too
Thick eyebrows are kinoWhoever came up with penciled eyebrows should be flayed alive
>>219750904>>219751056i love this phenotype
>>219774373let's do it
>>219751459Nah, she's a solid average. Those are among the best.
>>219765850Apparently Bava directed that opening scene.
>>21977339680s Jess makes me want a wife like thatSnood would be a good candidate, she can get the 80s mom hairdo when she begins to mature
That it was inferior to the gay remake
>>219774571I think women like her are top-tier gorgeous, it's just that they're pretty in a kind, gentle, and natural way that doesn't necessarily stand out as 'hot' to normies. Maybe she seems too much like a gentle wife or mom, or laid-back hippie to them. Personally I regard this as ultimate wife material and extremely sexy. But somehow I find wife or gf material sexy
>>219774373Based and agreed.
I love this groovy boomette
>>219774571>>219775121>average = best>pretty because she looks kind etc.these are tells that you've spun something as "ideal" because you're aware that you yourself are in the low tiers of attractiveness and your pride won't let you ever acknowledge the fact that there are women out there you'd never have a chance with purely based on looks, actual hot women. gayer than actual homosexuals you lot.
>>219775015>>219775121>>219775269Hi fren, glad to see ya here!
>>219775395this nigga a sexual attraction purist
>>219775419no, you're so deep in mental gymnastics you don't even grasp reality as it is anymore.
>>219775395I'd say it's more that you are more concerned with superficial ideas of attractiveness, and can't recognize true beauty which usually has a spiritual dimension to it, a depth factorI didn't say Jessica isn't incredibly physically beautiful, but she radiates a spiritual beauty as well. It's the blending of the two that I like. Going by your post I imagine you don't resonate with kind energy so maybe its appeal doesn't register for you?
>>219775402Good to see ya
>>219775536>I'd say it's more that you are more concerned with superficial ideas of attractivenessphysical attraction IS superficial, retardo-chan. what you're doing is trying to rationalize your self-imposed trauma into a more noble thing
>>219750904Every time I see Jessica Harper's face I am completely taken aback.
>>219775587Suspirianon is right though, beauty does have a spiritual depth to it. When a toddler draws a shitty scribble of a cat, people still appreciate that drawing in spite of its shitty poorly drawn lines; not because they rationalized their trauma of being bad artists, but that the drawing communicates the spiritual struggle of life against matter. Think of a rose growing in an abandoned junkyard. Of a tiny birb flapping its tiny little birb wings for the first time. Of Thom Yorke cracking his voice like a pubescent boy every time he sings live. We don't need rationalizations to find these beautiful, the struggle is intuitively beautiful to us! Jessica Harpner's beauty is like this too, she may not be a 10 in the conventional sense but she has a vitality that communicates the eternal will to struggle embedded in every lifeform. Perhaps this is also why we find hot people the most beautiful when they're all emo and melancholic, because a happy hot person doesn't communicate as much of this 'struggle'.
>>219774373>Thick eyebrows are kinoYes
>>219775864It's crazy someone like her not only exists, but during our own lifetime.
>>219752656I like hairy arms and happy trail.
>>219777652Well said. It's a soulfulness, this kind of deep beauty. I personally think it's true beauty. It's more of like a lyrical or sonorous qualitySomeone like Amber Heard for instance has the supposedly beautiful proportions but there is a vacancy and spiritual ugliness. Harper has an inner richness, a deep emotional reserve... of empathy and kindness and sadness and sometimes even tinges of fear or suffering which, as you're suggesting, has a kind of pathos that gives it this richnessSomeone else with deep inner beauty is Sissy Spacek. I'm not saying she or Jessica aren't physically beautiful, although the most appealing examples of the balance of physical and spiritual beauty is when there is almost necessarily a degree of character or strangeness or 'flaw' or subtlety to their appearance, helping to embody that tension you're describing
Susperia 2: Electric Snoodaloo
I for one think we need to forget about the Susperia "remake", and just have a Susperia sequel, starring Snood as Jessica Harper's character's daughter (or grandaughter?)
Has some nice colors but that's about it
what a cutie
Why do so many of the best actresses have small tits?
>>219777652>because a happy hot person doesn't communicate as much of this 'struggle'.That reminds me of that "hot" brazilian chick from the clip at the food truck. Her just full-throttle egotist energy and hypersexuality is too much. You have to offset that level of attractiveness with some humility and gentleness or it's almost offputting (but anyone who is overly egotistical is offputting; it's interesting that attractiveness doesn't necessarily shield a person from that fault). It's like it's unfeminine, or intense to the point of being like overripeness or somethingI think I'm not very into latinas, or even a lot of Italian women, for this reason. The boisterousness is unpleasant in a woman imo. I like gentle women (and the Bible says they should be this way so this preference a lot of men have can be backed up spiritually)
>>219780953>>219777652I hate beautiful, rich, and especially happy people.
>>219778597Hell yeah! I love how women barely ever shaved back then.>>219780218Well put. Imo, part of Harper and Spacek's appeal is having stunning looks without looking like a stereotypical supermodel (more in line with the vacuousness of someone like Heard). Critics would call her plain compared to someone like Heard but all I see is a 10/10.Side note: Jess was actually close to modeling for Mademoiselle magazine before she began her acting career, and it makes complete sense.
>>219781073Yeah, I see a 10/10 too. I'm not sure why anyone might rate her as more mid level except that maybe they prefer someone more overtly sexy in their energy and presentation, more makeup, stereotypically "hot". Then again, for me, that gorgeous face and those EYES should demonstrate her high level of beauty well enough, even if she has a more subdued and gentle and non-showy energy Which is also attractive, but I think shallow people relate more to showy, explicit presentation and energy because they're crass or selfish and like is drawn to like. Some people would say they're "low vibrational" and attracted to low vibrational appearances
>>219781440Low vibrational as in more carnal, more materially-oriented, rather than oriented to something higher + deeper (beauty that feels like a reflection of something above them/beyond us, a higher ideal/form or inner spark shining through ephemeral appearances)
>>219781026That seems irrational to me. I only hate normal people.
>>219780806>Why do so many of the best actresses have small tits?Because tiny tits are incredibly charming and aristocratic compared to big honkers. Flat = justice
Tbh at first I didn't like it. It doesn't make much sense. Random rooms full of razor wire, ugly hairy man hand stabbing people with a fake knife and super red fake blood, maggots on the ceiling, WITCH, etc... etc... I was like wtf why is this a horror classic, this shit sucks. Some people claim this is scary lol??Then I went to bed and was legitimately spooked tossing and turning thinking about it. I can best describe it as some horrible hag nightmare put to screen. I guess Argento studied the use of color in old Disney fairy tales and all this crazy subliminal shit. The film really targets the unconcious mind in a way no other film really does, at least that I've come across. Shit legitimately feels cursed.
>>219781510>>219781440>hurr she might not be that hot but she's like connected to the 6 gorillionth dimension broNow this is just sad cope that>>219775395 is correct to call out.
>>219781440This reads like the manifesto of an extremely mentally ill pedophile
>>219757354>>219775546>>219780680yeah nah, she doesnt have 'it' that jessica does. her facial features are too soft, she looks too childish. looks nothing like jessica and does absolutely nothing for me.
>>219782041>I guess Argento studied the use of color in old Disney fairy tales and all this crazy subliminal shit. See picrel. Argento loves his dream logic, needless to say.
>>219784496I like Snood but in the end, no one can compare to Jessica.
Argento is often such a hack yet he has these moments of pure cinematic bliss and they all coincide with him still being with Daria Nicolodi that I often wonder if she did moments like Suspiria opening and whatnot. Likely not.
bump
>>219750904I'm totally fascinated by the way women look in 70's movies. They're just so effortlessly thin and healthy looking. Aware of their surroundings. Sexual without dressing like skanks.
>>219781915theyre both flat
>>219750904It's good but co-opted by modern day alt thots (or whatever we're using instead of art hoe now), who will look at you in confusion if you ask them if they like any other Argento, or Fulci or Bava
>>219787511Seriously! It's genuinely frustrating how effortlessly beautiful women were on average back then, compared to the neurotic, uppity fat bitches that pass as women nowadays.>>219788429Thank GOD
>>219789430You must be old as fuck
>>219751056Ellie Page?
>>219774371Very nice.
>>219775007I can totally see that.
Adorable profile
>>219790318God do I love her thin long toes and bony witch fingers…
So much samefagging in these threads
>>219790458It's disturbing. Björk stalker type shit
>>219790458>>219790524>everyone I don't like on an anonymous imageboard is the same exact person!For all we know you're samefagging right now.
>>219790590>no u!Kys famalam
>>219790616You first, weirdo lmao
>>219777652>>219780218I'm afraid you both are the epitome of what I am describing. Allow me to expand:You are an ape, as such you are primarily driven by superficial needs, physical attraction being one of them. Naturally, this attraction can fluctuate based on early exposure of the individual to certain human environments, but not so much that it is fundamentally and consistently different in independent instances. There's no denying that a teenager, i.e someone in the blossoming of their own sexuality, will gravitate towards an ideal set of physical characteristics at first, shared by their fellows for the most part. But social aspects will also dictate impetuses to stand out, as social hierarchies are dynamic and much too powerful in these formative years. It is from then on that the more peculiar tastes begin forming, generally, manifesting themselves more obviously later.The fact that you are so hung up on an ethereal sense of kindness in the gauging of a woman's attractiveness, tells me all I need to know, in light of the above exposé: you've been, and likely still are, for the most part of your life, a fat, ugly loser, in the colloquial and social sense, who's never had a virtual chance with a coveted female, as in ranking in the top percentiles of physical attractiveness, influenced by your specific social and demographic circumstances. This in turn has made rejection, in light of the imaginary attempt to bridge this gap, the primary drive in the shaping of your subconscious preferences, which would highlight, above all, traits as kindness and the like, as being "ideal." So it's not that this is a spontaneous magnetism we're witnessing, in the dominion of physical attraction, but a constantly, albeit perhaps unknowingly, renewed conviction, in order to concile your pride with the complex social order that manifests naturally in our midst, and thus it's so ingrained by now that it a different conception doesn't even compute in your own defensive mind.
mucho texto
>"kind"? "soulful"? "ethereal beauty"? that sounds like sum gay ahh shii senpai frfr, i get hard just looking at some big ahh titties and a big fat *peach emoji*>you're not gay, are you blud? that would NOT be bussin' no caphow do you respond without sounding like a massive phaggot?
>>219752839Your queen I presume
>>219791223I would simply mog
Witches are not real
>>219791456there is no mogging, only be mogged
>>219791482Bet.
>>219791018this
>>219774385I love this phenotype so fucking much.
