What the FUCK was his problem!?
he was doing his job, enforcing the lawback the blue
>>219766429He chose to release a convicted murderer over the son of God
>>219765160He’s a based conservative
>>219766641For if you believed Moses, you would believe Me; for he wrote about Me. But if you do not believe his writings, how will you believe My words?”He was obviously liberal since he didn’t even believe in his own holy book. If he followed his scripture he would have followed Jesus.
>>219765160when people say "Jesus was a jew" they forget that this guy was the real jew.
does the theory that Jesus was the illegitimate son of a Roman soldier hold any water? That would make him half-Italian, no?
>>219766641Nah the Pharisees were the progressives (whose ideas became the foundation of the thalmudic judaism of today), the Saduccees were the conservatives.
>>219766844Possible, or he was Jospeh’s son conceived before marriage but they kept grace using this story and quickly married, and they ran withit enough that young Jesus had heard this story too which opened up a path of divine and lateral spiritual thinking (and perhaps an awakening to the universal Godhood in all of us, which simply cannot be handled in the language of the time without being heard as heresy)
>>219766753>schizo says something schizophrenic
>>219765160He figured out they cast a tranny as Mary.
>>219766958The image of baphomet doesn’t exist until the 1800s and is just a symbol for the union of opposites in divinity.
>>219766953That’s just good Connexive Logic baby
>>219766999Your point being, it's a nothingburger?
>>219767040Baphomet literally has nothings to do with jews. It was an image based on what the Templars supposedly worshipped, which spans everything from a mummified head of John the Baptist to a cat to Muhammad.
>>219767092
>>219766999The tranny you worship hates you even more than you hate yourself
>>219767128>most jews don’t like to admit it Oh so a retard said something other jews would call retarded. I believe they worship the devil now. GGThere’s an entire culture of White supremacists who say the same thing. Even that Jesus/Hitler was Lucifer in opposition of the Jewish demon YHWH
>>219765160circumcised
>>219765160Evil men cannot be good in the face of something holy.look at the shills in thread.demons can quote scripture, but they cannot change their nature.
>>219766544Jesus = God = genocided pre-flood populationCheckmate! Sorry, atheists.
>>219766429Pontius Pilate says Jesus didn't break the law.
>>219767170God is necessarily a tranny being the Absolute and totality of all aspects of existence. Trannies themselves are a gnostic phenomenon, rejecting their biological form as an evil prison not representative of their true soul. None of this has anything do with Satan.
>>219766641That's weird, they were pro-abortion
>>219766429
>>219767250>Pontius Pilate after declaring a man innocent
>>219767307>conservative is when American bipartisan politics Nigger, if that’s the morality they’re conserving, they’re conservative. Jesus literally said to disown your family to follow him. That’s a radical progressive stance.
>>219767347
>>219767398The ascetic movement predates Christ by hundreds of years. He also argued that the Pharisees weren't following the Torah.
>>219767448>The ascetic movement predates Christ by hundreds of yearsAmong jews or was Jesus some leftist hippie advocating exotic foreign spirituality? And what does the Torah say about conception? It’s almost like the 10 Commandments doesn’t actually account for all the intricacies of real life which is why you have to descend into autism like is tying your shoes breaking the Sabbath?
>>219767541>And what does the Torah say about conceptionThou shalt not kill? Pretty self-explanatory tbqh
>>219767541Jesus was advocating based on the intent of the scripture, the Pharisees were the guys being too weird about it and adding a whole lot of shit that isn't actually there (like modern jews), the Saduccees were the guys being too autistic about the scripture trying to follow it by word.Both those groups were at odds with each other but ultimately conspired to kill Jesus.
>>219767307What does a “legal person” mean, that you can’t give them an inheritance or write their name on a deed? Why dishonestly jump to the conclusion of abortion? Could it be because you asked Grok about the jewish stance on abortion and nothing damning came up, SAAAAR?
>>219765160Jesus said he couldn't suck on bloody baby penises anymore.
>>219767640And then Christians immediately proceeded to get too weird with it and add unnecessary shit because actually living according to Jesus’ teaching isn’t conducive to a functional civilization, but “Christ is King!” looks good in a twitter bio.
>>219767192Post nose.
>>219765160>YOUR FORESKIN IS MINE!
>>219767686Damn... you guys even executed pregnant women. That's crazy
>>219765160God took his foreskin.
>>219767749Living according to Jeus teachings obviously benefits a civilization but they aren't a substitute for worldly law.
>>219767958Jesus never said anything civilization hadn’t figured out except the explicitly batshit ascetic ideals such as blessing your enemies or relinquishing your wealth which literally no has ever followed. So is Jesus correct or were the Pharisees for putting some asterisks on God’s rules?
>>219768257>Jesus never said anything civilization hadn’t figured outOh boy, ever read a history book?Jesus didn't give laws, he gave guidelines. He didn't actually want you to cut off your hand to avoid sinning he wanted you to treat sin like that was preferable. He advocated for a radical spiritual mindset from which the rest follows.
>>219765160He worshipped Saturn.
>>219766825people forget Jesus was an infamous cult leader that performed street magic shows and conned hundreds of people
>>219768458Post nose.
>>219767250>Pontius Pilate says Jesus didn't break the law.Then why did he cruxify him?
>>219767427debunked
>>219766641I don't recall ever meeting a based conservative. Seems like they all just wear blinders and vote for pedophiles. Oh and worship some middle eastern jew.
>>219765160>his problem!?member of the tiny hat club
>>219766844Gee, I wonder who would make up an obvious slander like that?Would it be the same people who claim the Iranians murdered 42,000 protestors in a weekend?Maybe the people who said the Germans murdered 6,000,000 of them using masturbation machines and then magically vanished all the remains.
>>219771027Unlike the left who worship European Jews and Africans.
>>219765160Vikings put a kink in their Persian supply lines by capturing the straits of Hormuz, thus slowing and disrupting they're slow infiltration and genociding of the original Irish tribe of Dan Hebrews to replace them with they're own Israelite. basically butthurt
>>219768354Ever read the Bible?>Matthew 5:17-18>[17] “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. [18] For truly, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will pass from the Law until all is accomplished.
>>219769852To avoid a Jewish riot, he tried to acquit him and they insisted.
>>219765160>PhariseesMockery of Jews shall be kept to an appropriate minimum.
>>219767347Based>>219767427Cringe, yet somehow also based
>>219766958What?The androgynus dyke i assume you're talking about is literally satan
>>219771027>Le heckin' wholesome pedochungusgross
>>219767844Which flies in the face of Exodus 21:22-25. Accidentally hitting a woman and causing an early birth is punishable by a fine, even if there is no observable harm to the child. Accidentally hitting a woman and causing harm to the child is punishable wound for wound, up to and including life for life.
>>219772896>To avoid a Jewish riotHe didn’t take orders from Jews and had no problem putting down riots.
>>219766844No. Italians can't heal blindness, raise the dead, multiply food, change water to wine, or pass through walls.
>>219767541>And what does the Torah say about conception?Not the Torah but the prophet said God knits us together in our mother's wombs. That means all the way together. Soul to body. At conception. After that it's simple growth and development, no fundamental change.
>>219773463>Not the Torah but the prophet said God knits us together in our mother's wombs. That means all the way together. Soul to body. At conception. After that it's simple growth and development, no fundamental change.Israelites didn’t believe in souls. That is a concept borrowed from Greek philosophy.
>>219773646Fine, call it "spirit." The inner man. That which persists in eternity.Or conversely, deny the concept entirely, and the argument for birth-conferred personhood becomes even weaker. You actually NEED the existence of a soul/spirit, and you NEED it to be absent prior to an arbitrary cutoff point, in order for abortion to be moral. If all we are is matter, then there is no observable material difference between a 20-week baby in the womb and the same 20-week baby in an incubator in the NICU.
>>219773344That's backwards, causing a miscarriage causes the fine, killing the woman is what registers as eye for eye.
>>219774079No. Read it again.>KJV22If men strive, and hurt a woman with child, so that her fruit depart from her, and yet no mischief follow: he shall be surely punished, according as the woman's husband will lay upon him; and he shall pay as the judges determine.23And if any mischief follow, then thou shalt give life for life,24Eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot,25Burning for burning, wound for wound, stripe for stripe.>NIV22“If people are fighting and hit a pregnant woman and she gives birth prematurely but there is no serious injury, the offender must be fined whatever the woman’s husband demandsand the court allows.23But if there is serious injury, you are to take life for life,24eye for eye, tooth for tooth,hand for hand, foot for foot,25burn for burn, wound for wound, bruise for bruise.>ESV22“When men strive together and hit a pregnant woman, so that her children come out, but there is no harm, the one who hit her shall surely be fined, as the woman's husband shall impose on him, andhe shall pay as thejudges determine.23But if there is harm, then you shall paylife for life,24eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot,25burn for burn, wound for wound, stripe for stripe.>NASB22“Now if people struggle with each other and strike a pregnant woman so thatshe gives birth prematurely, but there is no injury,the guilty personshall certainly be fined as the woman’s husbandmay demand of him, and he shallpayas the judgesdecide.23But if there isany furtherinjury,then you shall appointas a penaltylife for life,24eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot,25burn for burn, wound for wound,bruise for bruise.
>>219774009> Fine, call it "spirit." The inner man. That which persists in eternity.That’s just a spirit by another name, which they didn’t believe in. They believed they were their bodies, which is why resurrection of the dead in apocalyptic prophesy was a huge deal for them. The concept of a separate spirit or essence was borrowed from the Greeks.
>>219765160His master Yaldabaoth/Samael told him to get rid of Jesus asap.
>>219765160>jews are asked to treat non-jews like human beings>seethe about it for 2000 years
>>219768393What happens in the bullseye?
>>219774262gay sex
>>219774079>>219774191>NLT22 “Now suppose two men are fighting, and in the process they accidentally strike a pregnant woman so she gives birth prematurely.[a] If no further injury results, the man who struck the woman must pay the amount of compensation the woman’s husband demands and the judges approve. 23 But if there is further injury, the punishment must match the injury: a life for a life, 24 an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, a hand for a hand, a foot for a foot, 25 a burn for a burn, a wound for a wound, a bruise for a bruise.[a] 21:22Or"so she has a miscarriage";Hebrew reads"so her children come out.">Hebrew reads"so her children come out."
>>219774191>>219774310The "no serious injury" applies to the mother, because childbirth in the ancient world was dangerous. There is no "giving birth early" in ancient Israel, they didn't have due dates. You were either ready to pop, or you birthed a premature child with a 100% chance to die. Losing the fetus robbed the dad of a potential life, so you had to pay a fine. Losing the wife robbed the husband of an actual life, so you had to pay with yours. You can even cross reference this law with others in the ancient world that more explicitly state the same concept.
>>219766907That doesn't even make sense. Jesus claiming to be the son of God was also heresey at the time. Also goes against Jesus's actual teachings. Godhood does not exist within man.
>>219774512There are many passages where does appear to claim exactly that. Arguing Jesus isn't God isn't going to get you anywhere.
>>219774351>There is no "giving birth early" in ancient Israel, they didn't have due dates. You were either ready to pop, or you birthed a premature child with a 100% chance to die.They weren't retarded. They surely understood the concept of a ~9mo gestation period between last menstruation and childbirth. A kid born in the final month, depending how premature, would have a fighting chance. Not a 100% chance to die. Hence the need for the law. The final month, when the baby bump is big, would also seem the most vulnerable time when this law might come into play. >Losing the fetus robbed the dad of a potential life, so you had to pay a fine. Losing the wife robbed the husband of an actual life, so you had to pay with yours. Losing the wife is very obviously covered in the 5th commandment. It would be blindingly redundant to restate the 5th commandment in such a specific scenario. For this reason, we do not see laws specifically noting that the murder of a grocer counts as murder, the murder of a farmer also counts as murder, etc. This law was written to further clarify something that people such as yourself had grown fond of obfuscating for their own ends.>You can even cross reference this law with others in the ancient world that more explicitly state the same concept.I can't think of a less relevant exercise when analyzing the laws given to a people chosen by God to be Holy (SET APART).
>>219767347Pontus Pilate said he was he ships hands of it and would not kill and innocent man. Jews like this fucker >>219765160 said “His blood be upon us and our children” basically cursing themselves for all time through killing the messiah. >>219774512Jesus is very clear that he is the messiah and one with God, but you clearly never read scripture.
>>219766544Free Barrabas!>I watched the movie with Anthony Quinn.
why are jews like this
>>219775904>be ancient jews just doing casual subversion as they do>in comes ultra giga subversive jew 9000, subverts even the very jews>jews rightfully put an end to said subversion and resume their olden trad waysi don't get the bad rep the pharisees get for not buying some dude's grift
>>219767336I'm sorry but this is a clear case of a bad faith question and answer (yours, no chatGPT's). Pontius didn't find him to have broken the ROMAN civil law, while the accusations of the pharisees hinged primarily on local RELIGIOUS law, which Jesus most certainly broke, something that Pilate scoffed at because these were backwater hillbilly shenanigans to him.
>>219775571I wonder what will happened if Pilate really release Jesus and the jews riotting on the spot and killed some roman soldier.
>>219775181>A kid born in the final month, depending how premature, would have a fighting chanceAn infant born at a time where survival was plausible would not register as "coming out early". It would just be a birth, an on time birth.>Losing the wife is very obviously covered in the 5th commandment.No it isn't, because every society has their own standards for what constitutes murder versus justified killing versus excusable accidents. Else, the Israelites would never be allowed to go to war or execute criminals, which they obviously did frequently. This law is meant to specify that accidentally causing a woman's death in childbirth does NOT fall under an excusable accident.>I can't think of a less relevant exercise when analyzing the laws given to a people chosen by God to be HolyOnly if you accept that these laws really did come from God, but I am suspicious that the only tribe in contact with the omnipotent creator of the universe spat out a legal code that mirrored what all the other tribes around them were doing anyway.
>>219765160Luciferians that wanted power for themselves. The Son of God came to establish His rightful rule and they murdered Him for it. >He had still one other, a beloved son. Finally he sent him to them, saying, ‘They will respect my son.’ But those tenants said to one another, ‘This is the heir. Come, let us kill him, and the inheritance will be ours.’ And they took him and killed him and threw him out of the vineyard. What will the owner of the vineyard do? He will come and destroy the tenants and give the vineyard to others.
>>219773360Dead. He had no answer.
