They changed the title of the spaceballs sequel. Boomer's can't do nothing right.
>merchandises merchandises
>>219780810>not directed by Mel Brooks>John Candy is dead>even the title isn't going to be what it's supposed to beWhat the fuck's the point of any of this?
>>219780986Mel’s grandkids need rehab money
>>219780986Update all the political wrongthink and humiliate the loyal fanbase. The same as usual
if it doesn’t come out till april of next year they haven’t started principal photography
>>219780986See>>219780956
>>219780986Hollywood's killed and raped Star Wars so thoroughly that they're going to kill and rape its Jewish-made parody of Star Wars.
>>219780999His grandkids are in their 50s.
>>219780999So did Carl Reiner's.
the original wasn't funny, the sequel definitely wont be funny
Hopefully they won't fuck up Young Frankenstein and Robin Hood. Those are my favorites.
If we cannot do nothing right, that means we do everything right. Gottem
>jewing the jewish parody
>>219780810>finally after 40 years, the sequel to a mediocre movie you've been waiting for
>>219780810will the first weekend recover costs for his eyeballshawhaw. like and subscribe and upvoot
>>219781628I'm old enough to remember watching this movie in ten minute installments on YouTube, back when there was a ten minute limit on YouTube.
who is the target audience for this? the 50something year olds who remember renting the original on VHS tape 35 years ago?
>>219781725That target audience is now almost as big as your age group. You're living in the past
>>219781781Oh, wow. Is this true? I'm glad to be outnumbered finally. Maybe I'll stop getting blamed for everything because I'm a middle aged white man.
Hey Remember History of the World part 2, Yeah me neither
>>219780810The changed the name because they already found the money
>>219780810>We changed it from "Search for More Money" because we were afraid of making it seem like we scamming Jeff Bezos. Not sure if it will go straight to streaming, but it is being funded by Amazon.
>>219781055Star Wars was already jewish made
>>219781076The original was funnythe sequel probably won't be but I do have some slight hope, the new naked gun was good even if maybe not quite the same thing as the originals.I still say though that spaceballs 2 shouldn't be a star wars parody at all, it should be a gundam one
>>219780999Surely the Producers made him obscenely wealthy?
It'll be space neovaginaLMAO
>>219780810Should of just called it what they said they would in the original
>>219781071
>>219780810>Boomers This guy's so fucking old he's not a boomer, his kids are.
>>219780986The title is supposed to be the quest for more money
>>219784040>unc still doesn't get itok boomer
Why is Galaxy Quest so soulful while Spaceballs is just 'empty'? Is It the source material?
>>219784400Galaxy Quest is a loving homage to Star Trek and the culture around it while Space Balls is just lazy sex jokes on budget versions of star wars setsI watched both again recently and space balls is just a bad movie
>>219784400They're doing different things though both are a "space comedy" which is way more specific than a sci-fi comedy. I can't really explain it better then that.
>A comedy sequel 40 years after the first one and is directed by a 100 year old manYeah this is gonna be good
>>219783116>Surely the Producers made him obscenely wealthy?A film from late 60's? Its from time when money spent on entertainment and profits from it were orders of magnitude smaller. Star cult as it is now didn't exist and even the biggest stars of era weren't insanely well compensated, sure more than average joes, nothing compared to today.
I'm vaguely optimistic about this actually. We're in a good place for a parody of SW and franchise slop, considering how bad it's all been for about ten years.I mean, I don't think it'll be good, but they might get some good hits in.
>>219786236They turned it into a Broadway play that ran for years.
>>219786236$1 in the snp in 1960 would be $125 today
>>219782964we ain't found shit
>>219781685>get to like part 6 and it's the only one that's been removed
>>219781110They’re going to do a Young Frankenstein remake in color with Leslie Jones as Dr. Frankenstein.
>>219780810Why even bother
Space balls isn't funny, so it doesn't matter
>>219789605i knew it, i'm surrounded by assholes.KEEP POSTING, ASSHOLES
They got Rick Moranis? Something is altering the timeline, and they're not even being subtle about it.
>>219789605ZOMG EPIK ZOOOOMIE TAKE FR FR
>>219781071Well he did make that lethargic Spinal Tap sequel, probably the last thing he did btw
>>219788298NoJust no.
>>219790311His IMDb says the last thing he did was toy story 4.
I wonder what zoomers will think of this movie. Mel Brooks is like the king of boomer humor, there is no way they will get half the references and jokes this movie will have.
>>219790092Moranis' children are all grown-ups, he is ready to take back his acting career.
>>219784040True, he is not even a Silent Generation, the gen before Boomers, but actually he is part of the Greatest Generation, the one that were from the old 20s.
>>219780810>they didn't name it the joke from the first oneFan entitlement. It was clearly a joke and the joke has been said over and over. I actually laughed when I saw the title "the new one" like, that's good and if you're not laughing now, you probably won't be later. Hopefully there be some "I clapped" moments for you in the movie.
>>219780810Is there a specific reason why they’re not going for “Spaceballs 2: The Search for More Money”?
>>219786309>considering how bad it's all been for about ten yearsYou're a sap if you think this movie will mock any of the shit that has caused franchise movies to suck
Mel Brooks has never made a funny movie. I unironically lost whatever remaining respect I had for boomers when I saw Blazing Saddles
>>219780810SPACEBALLS: THE JEW ONE
>>219792146You wouldn't get it.
>>219792211Yeah because I don’t have lead poisoning
I encourage everyone to check out the Jiminy Glick interview of Mel Brooks on YouTube.It’s a laugh riot!
>>219791904The dead wife was always an excuse. He just doesn't want to act. His children have been adults for 20 years.
>>219792146My boomer coworker got really pissed when I told him I hadn’t seen any Mel Brooks so I spent a weekend watching Spaceballs, Blazing Saddles, The Producers and Young Frankenstein and I didn’t laugh a single time. I told the boomer they suck and are just the boomer version of Date Movie-esque trash and he didn’t talk to me for two weeks lmao.
>>219792362If Blazing Saddles can't make you laugh, then you're a fag, if Young Frankenstein can't make you life then you're a zoomer, if The Producers can't make you life then you are a loser, and if Spaceballs can't make you life then you don't understand word play. So given your statement and these facts I can safely say you are an illiterate zoomer fag
>>219792432
>>219792432You just have bad taste
>>219780810Add it to the slop pile.
>>219792146>Blazing SaddlesYou picked the worse example possible. That movie is actually quite different in comparison with your average comedy of the time.
>>219781628>RLMfags thinking they know qualityShouldn’t you be busy watching your Master’s favorite movies: The Force Awakens and Jurassic World?
>>219792821obsessed
>>219792950… bro you used one of their reaction images. You did bring them up first.
>>219785333>by a 100 year old manTo be fair he looks like 30 years younger.
>>219793023It's just a guy with a coconut?
>>219793369Coconut deeze.
>>219780986>not directed by Mel BrooksMel will probably die before the movie is even finished, he's nearly 100
>Not calling it "The Search for more Money" as a callback AND a critique of current Hollywood practicesthat tells me everything I need to know
my only hope is this is "actually number 3" and they constantly reference ridiculous things that happened in the previous installment - including explanations for the lack of barf and dot matrixthat's fantasy booking however and i won't let that taint my judgement - i'll just let my judgement do that!
>>219793955>my only hope is this is "actually number 3"Knowing Brooks, it will probably be 7 or 8, considering this movie doesn't have a number.It will be a vague sequel that no one will know exactly which number is.
>>219793955Basically the Dangan Ronpa v3 endingIts actually 53.
>>219780986more money
all the stars are here
>>219780986>>219794069This, the movie is just a cashgrab. He doesn't even hide it.
>>219781685>I'm old enough to remember watching this movie in ten minute installments on YouTubeI'm old enough to have rented it at my local ma and pa video store.
>>219792229No but you have microplastic poisoning, instead.
>>219780999>grandkidsFor his age, he would have some gran-grandkids, or more.
oh boy another subversive joo movie, hooray
>>219784400>Galaxy QuestLiterally who?
Young Frankenstein isn't funny, and that was his best.
>>219790311that’s rob, not carl, dumb-dumb
>>219795819I think it's one of the best children's movies ever made.
>>219782964This unironically made me laugh kek
>>219795696zoomer moment
>>219792760That doesn’t make it good or funny
The entire gimmick of Spaceballs was>haha Star Wars stupidwhen Star Wars was an invincible S-tier IP. Nowadays Star Wars is dead, who the fuck is this for?
>>219781628>mediocreits his best work tied with men in tights
Any jokes that could possibly be told in this were already told in the first one.
>>219792146If you didn't laugh during Young Frankenstein or Dracula: Dead and Loving It, you're a fucking liar.
>>219795696The Star Trek spoof with Tim Allen, Alan Rickman, and Sigourney Weaver.
>>219780986>>219780810Mel Brooks is 99 years old and completely coma toast.He has nothing to do with this, any promotional footage featuring "him" is ai
>>219792096Probably some stuffy exec doesn't like a joke being made about how he's greedy.
>>219793369it’s an eceleb with a coconut.
>>219796653>coma toastHe's fine. He attended Conan O'Brien's Christmas party was completely lucid and unlike some people didn't die afterwards.
>>219784400I don't remember too much of spaceballs, and what I remember isn't too spiteful but you can always tell a difference between>I Love it, I'll make fun of it because I love itand>haha look at this dorky shit, let's make a laugh about itI like Mel Brook's schticks, but he's probably not a sci fi/star wars nerd like galaxyquest was for star trek. So he's making fun of something he knows of but isn't invested in. Frankenstein or Blazing Saddles or the producers goes over much better because he's clearly big into horror, westerns, or theatrical stuff. Same reason why pic related is funny for warhammer fans. Satire by actual honest fans of something always does better
>>219794216>W H O L E S O M E/tv/ can't get me to hate this.
>>219796653Mel seems fine. Chuck Lorre is 95 and completely lucid, so is Shatner. John Lithgow is 80 and just signed on for that Harry Potter gig and everyone is certain that he will croak, even though he seems fine Not everyone turns to dust once becoming a geriatric. Whereas others will start dying in their 50s, or even late 40s. Genetics, lifestyle, etc.
>>219783097Bad bait.
>>219785333Don’t worry, Mel isn’t directing. A Jewish nepobaby that has not made a single film of note or quality is directing it.
>>219781022I'm afraid to see what she looks in the new one, I thought she was the sexiest woman ever when i was a kid.
>>219798854The irony here is that Mel himself is Jewish, so there really is no difference
>>219780810Give it to me straight:Is he a based Jew or not?Surely there must be some that exist, I know he is at least self aware.
>>219795916this lol, it was literally porn parody tier
>>219799142>Is he a based Jew or not?He made this unironic banger, that puts hims in the based camp no matter what https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kmzPnpn63nA
