[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: lucas.jpg (21 KB, 416x416)
21 KB
21 KB JPG
>>
They think the sequels will age as good as the prequels but that's impossible
>>
I was born in the 1990s so it is safe to say that I am a true Star Wars fan and will always respect George.
>>
Hey!
>>
Nigguhs?
>>
I have nothing to apologize for because I never stopped believing in you, George.
>>
>>219781562
OK I'll say it. Star Wars is his baby and he and only he has the right to rape it (with or without love). Never should have sold it the fat retard.
>>
HACK
A
C
K
>>
File: 1706389508033953.jpg (354 KB, 1410x1080)
354 KB
354 KB JPG
>>219781562
Okay. Fuck George Lucas. The prequels are shit and always will be. Redlettermedia was right about everything.
>>
>>219781562
>starslop
grow up
>>
GEORGE LUCAS RAPED OUR CHILDHOOD
>>
>>219781599
Prequels didn't "age good" in the first place. The fuck are you talking about? They're practically the poster-child for "lazy CGI that was barely passable and maybe impressive to a few Boomers even upon release and then rapidly aged out of impressiveness even further".
>>
>>219782728
So why do people still remember them fondly, and why won't anyone ever look back on the sequels except to either point out how laughably shitty they are, or post a seething ragebait thread pretending they're just misunderstood masterpieces?
>>
>>219782969
>So why do people still remember them fondly
"Slop-gobbling nerds with no standards and saw the Prequels in theaters when they were 8-years-old" is a bit more of a specific demographic than you imply by using the term "people".

>why won't anyone ever look back on the sequels except to either point out how laughably shitty they are, or post a seething ragebait thread pretending they're just misunderstood masterpieces
There will DEFINITELY be people doing that at some point. You seem to make a lot of baseless and misguided assumptions.
>>
>>219781562
GOONGAS
>>
>>219781562
You're an incompetent manchild hack fraud who was propped up across the whole of his career by better writers and editors?

Ok. Anything else you wanted me to say? No? We good? k see ya baby
>>
>>219781562
MACLUNKEY
>>
>four billion dollars of disney money hasn't bought this guy a single ounce of credibility or genuine friendship
kek never fails to make me laugh

the same weak impotent faggots who try to claim george "won" because he got the most moneypoints are the sake weak faggots whose lives go nowhere and think they'd be fixed if only they could eat the rich
turns out rich losers are still losers and wealthy people still commit suicide
>>
>>219783019
How is it misguided, or even an assumption at this point? The sequels came out a decade ago already and everyone still universally accepts that they're complete and utter garbage with no redeeming features.
They didn't even sell any merchandise outside of a few people buying Kylo's lightsaber toys before the first movie dropped.
>>
>apalogize to the guy who served slop followed by then selling out the franchise to a company that made even worse slop
no
>>
>>219781562
that beard is not fooling anyone about your jawline, Georgie
>>
>>219782969
>people still remember them fondly
jpeg of fat, greasy, ugly malding basedboy with giant angry red pimple on his cheek unhinging his jaw in excitement

strawmanning the sequels as being bad (they are) doesn't stop the prequels from being bad (they are)

the argument "unnhhh people will feel nostalgic for 30 years ago therefore everything is equally valid" simply doesn't make those garbage millennial baby retard movies any good, or diminish the fact the original trilogy of films ARE genuinely good. moral relativism is never a valid construct
>>
>>219781599
TLJ is already getting a glow up you sad prequeltard. It's great seeing you faggots writhing while having to endure the same shit you put on OT purists.
>>
>>219783469
>TLJ is already getting a glow up
TLJ was always respected with critics and filmfags (the ony Star Wars other than arguably TESB), and most of the regular audience. The youtube grifter bubble falling out of grace does hardly equate to a glow-up or reevaluation of the film.
The bigger problem the sequel trilogy has is (and has always been) the other two episodes, one of which is quite uninspired (not anymore so than your average Star Wars, but still) and the other being a complete mess stuffed with Macguffins and empty fan service. ROS will never age particularly well, simply because it fails on even telling a cohesive story of any kind.
>>
>>219781599
The only reason the prequels “aged good” is because the little faggoloons who praise now were in diapers at the time of release, and didn’t experience the crushing disappointment as it was happening. I can sympathize to an extent though, I never knew why people hated the Ewoks. Though that might also be because I actually saw Ewok Adventure before I even knew what Star Wars was.

That said, I don’t completely disagree, because at least people still gave enough of a shit to be angry about it and make documentaries about it. We’re in full-on apathy now.
>>
File: IMG_8422.png (1.83 MB, 1536x2048)
1.83 MB
1.83 MB PNG
>>219781562
Ok. I’ll say it. George, you raped our childhood’s tight little asses. You lulled us into a false sense of security and entertainment coming to our childhood’s door step like a kindly space wizard and proceeded to drag us into the millennium falcon and speed off to the Dagobah Swamps. But it didn’t end there, George. You remember. Boba Fett was at your side holding us at blaster point and then… HE emerged from the shadows with a ridiculously BIG GUNGAN COCK that went down to his knees “MEESA GONNA LOVE YOU LOOOOOOONG TIME YOU SCREAM SOOOOO WEEEE FOR MEESA NOW” his screams echoed through that swampy planet. You watched, eagerly masturbating to our childhoods being RAPED THEY WERE GAPED
>>
>>219781562
>Bazinga
>>
>>219784307
>TLJ was always respected with critics and filmfags

The access media, you mean, who need to maintain a good working relationship with Yidsney in order to keep getting access?

Both Solo and Rise of Skywalker bombed after TLJ, and then they stopped even trying theatrical releases. That should tell you everything you need to know.
>>
>>219781562
I don't need to apologise to George because I knew he was right all along. I always knew that the likes of Plinklett and RLM were deluded, clueless armchair hacks and that their audience were retarded cattle with no ability to form their own opinions. Now they can all sit in the ashes they created looking very stupid and retarded all while George's legacy becomes stronger and more obvious by the day.
>>
>>219784421
>who need to maintain a good working relationship with Yidsne
You do know that parotting that bullshit makes you think like a qanon retard, right?
Go ask /film/ what they think of Rian Johnson, compared to Abrams or even Lucas.
>>
>>219781562

George is a good "idea guy", but should never have written scripts or directed film.
>>
>>219784517
>retard Johnson
lol, lmao
>>
>>219783131
>everyone still universally accepts that they're complete and utter garbage with no redeeming features
Lol no they don't. There are ABSOLUTELY Sequel-Defenders, retard. Just like there are Prequel-trannies like you.
>>
>>219784737
Try it, anon. Johnson is quite well respected. Mainly for things he did outside of the mainstream, of course. But even his Braking Bad, Star Wars and Knives Out (and that one didn't even start as mainstream) show that he's a director way above Hollywood standards.
>>
>>219784783
it just speaks poorly of Hollywood standards
>>
>>219784878
If so, that also speaks poorly of Star Wars, which is arguably what set up Hollywood standards for the last 60 years.
Main point is, Johnson made something that stands out from the usual slop. That is why critics lauded it, not because of some Disney/media conspiracy. Hence why critics also completely panned Abrams' Rise Of Skywalker, which was the exact opposite.
>>
File: GEG.jpg (144 KB, 800x450)
144 KB
144 KB JPG
>>219784402
LVCAS VVON
>>
>>219784471
The Prequels are shit from a dog's ass, we knew this long before RLM.
>>
>>219784783
hi rian.
>>
>>219788082
Hi Mauler.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.