>7 Jurassic Park movies>not a singular one has a scientifically accurate t-rex in it
>>219795775They're not dinosaurs, they are monsters.It was stated since the first movie.
>>219795775What even is a "scientifically accurate" t-rex?
>>219795836Not OP becauae we found T-rex skin and it was reptilian
>>219795836>large lips entirely covering teeth>mostly covered in colorful feathers>doesn't hunt for food, but is a docile scavenger>not as large as originally thought, Spinosaurus was actually considerably larger>doesn't roar, but coo like modern birds
>>219795980feathers don't fossilize
>>219796034>They were all gay and adopted rocks to hatch
>>219795775Paleontology is almost a meme science
>>219796034>ACK
>>219795775>4 renditions of t-rex in op>not a singular one is scientifically accurate
>>219796034Literally all of that is wrong.>>219796047skin impressions do, including those with feathers, and every t-rex skin impression shows scaly, featherless skin.
Land animals don't have feathers, God didn't make them that way
>>219796350trex scales were tough, hence the lack of imprint, you only see feather imprints on relatively small beasts with softer skin
>>219796244based ankylo fighting dirty in the streets
>>219795775
>>219796379You're just making shit up. I've never seen a single paper or paleontologist suggest anything like that.
The "le scientifically accurate feather" faggotry was unironically deboonked and leftroons have been coping for years.
>>219796034>Spinosaurus was actually considerably largerModern paleocucks built their whole identity on hating Spinosaur though
>scalefags want me to believe >>219796711 looks more vicious than >>219795775
wouldn't they just edit out the genes that make them grow feathers? just to fit public perception of how dinosaurs look? it's a theme part, not a science experiment
>>219796711You're still posting leftroon cope, though.>o-okay, there's no evidence of T. rex having a coat of feathers... B-BUT that doesn't mean it didn't have small hair-like feathers, chud!
>>219795775Your Mother has been real busy.
>>219796244
>>219796034So you basically want a Faggosaurus Cocks
>>219797376>this shit again
>>219797493>conveniently conceals the rest of the body
>>219795775Jurassic World Dominion has the opening scene set 65 million years ago, which features a T. rex with a downy hairlike feather covering. Though the scene negates any credit it could have gotten for having a more accurate T. rex by also including Giganotosaurus there, a dino which lived 30 million years before T. rex and on another continent and never would have met it
>>219796711Why are these T. rexes so fat?
>>219795775Those are not scientifically accurate. See Jurassic park 1 for scientifically accurate dinosaurs.
>>219797536You were saying?
>>219797629Almost everything about the dilophosaurus was fake and made up for the movie- while portraying its features as scientific discoveries they made through cloning it, which makes it even worse
>>219797830I can't stand people that say Jurassic Park was "accurate for the time" when it clearly wasn't, especially when they try to argue that it should be accurate now.
How long are people going to have this exact same conversation for?
>>219797245>Be allosaurus>Die in an embarrassing way by getting spiked in the dick>Millions of years later descendants of the furry faggot mammals you used to hunt and terrorise draw depictions of your death and laugh about it
>>219797931Probably for as long as the Jurassic franchise continues, and keeps associating fake monsters with dinosaurs in the public consciousness. Which isn't gonna stop any time soon
>>219798007People like to be entertained, anon, and they like cool looking animals.It'll only change when paleontology decides to stop being cringe and paleodocs stop trying to be performatively speculative for brownie points from tasteless faggots on Reddit.
>>219798073No one likes the cloverfield rancor in the last movie. Are you saying they should go ahead and do more of this shit?
>>219798265No. That's a whole new sentence.
>>219796034>lips entirely covering teethFair, the enamel of their teeth would need hydration from their saliva>mostly covered in colorful feathersNot true, skin prints of T-rex suggest that they were entirely scaled with no feathers whatsover.>doesn't hunt for food, but is a docile scavengerNo true. Multiple skeletons show wounds from fights with herbavores and their fossilized dung and stomach contents suggest they hunted prey, not scavenged.>not as large as originally thought, Spinosaurus was actually considerably largerT-rex was actually kind of undersized because of the amount of juvenile specimans discovered. Yes Spinosaurus was larger but it was also mostly aquatic.>doesn't roar, but coo like modern birdsWe have no way of knowing how any extinct animal sounded. This is just ludicrous speculation.Congrats 1 out of 5 points correct. You fail. Go back to your trey the explainer videos you midwit.
>>219795775Muh scientifically accurate dinosaurs is just the secular version of muh biblically accurate angels and I'm never going to pretend it's not.
>>219796034>>219798353The "maybe dinosaurs actually cooed" story is the dumbest thing because it doesn't account for how diverse dinosaurs were. How they dominated the earth for ~130 million years and came in all shapes and sizes. Saying they all made the same types of sounds is like an alien saying all mammals on earth right now sound the same
>>219796503 based asian dabbing on the white man
>>219797493Is there any other animal this works for? I only ever see that one.
The Tyrannosaurus in Jurassic Park was specifically designed to not be scientifically accurate (longer legs for one), so that the design could be copyrighted. People just copied it anyway.
>>219798656Lizards, snakes. Reptiles in general don't have much in the way of fleshy cartilaginous additions or protuberances on top of their skulls
>>219798656Snakes, but that's probably too easy.
>>219798768>>219798773based
>>219795775This thread is filled with midwits who don't know that the T-Rex liked to gather vegan animal skins in order to hold dinosaur drag queen shows.
>>219798656Even some birds, like vultures.
>>219797493Ok explain Gooseasaurus
>>219798918
>>219798909This isn't really any worse than what was done with the anthropomorphic dinos for little kids in We're Back! or The Land Before Time etc. It's just a modern take on roughly the same thing
>>219798991This you?
>>219798991NOOOOOOOO this kid's cartoon affects me personally!!!
chuds will have a huge meltdown once we crack AGI and it figures out all dinos were oversized birbs, just as lame as their pleistocene descendants
>>219799030Based. Nothing gets me harder than blowing the fuck out of the scalies as science progressively shows the world more and more of what the dinosaurs were really like. Once the deconstruction of the dinosaur's image is complete and nobody ever takes those shits seriously, we humans can finally say we mammals are the only true masters of the Earth.
>>219799030The AGI would be lying to you if it said that. There's no plausible way to take all our fossils of giant brachiosaurs or titanosaurs etc and interpret them as actually birdlike creatures
>>219795775>>219796711Evolution is just a theory.
>>219799226the obvious bird skelly in your pic says otherwise
>>219795775>Enough. I won't hear any more of this hebrew nonsense.
>>219797875One of the points made in the book was that the animals were not accurate because so much of the missing dna was just stitched together with other things like a frankenstein. The animals would often die for unexplained reasons or have weird skin sensitivities or fungal infections. The geneticist even tried to convince the old man to let him alter the dinosaurs to be less aggressive and he refused, wanting them to be the real thing. The geneticist argued that they already were not the real thing.
>>219795775>Trying to make dinosaurs lame and gay
>>219799321Evolution is a fact and easily observable in a lab, with organisms that have short enough lifespans
>>219800244Don't bother, this guy reposts his ritualistic message in every single dinosaur thread.
>>219797608and looks nothing like a Giganotosaurus
>>219796034>mostly covered in colorful feathersT-rex had scaly skin, you're getting your "science" from deviant art
>birds can't hurt y-ACK
>>219796715And even then Giganotosaurus was bigger but also gets hate because muh t-rex childhood memories
Dinosaurs were actually demons.
>>219800435Demons for who, when there were no people around? Isn't the whole point of a demon to torment others?
>cassowaries are 4-5 feet tall and weigh 100-150lbs>they make sounds like this https://youtu.be/iy-9Z2KrjsY>they can disembowel you with their feetNow imagine one that was 40 feet long, 14 feet tall at the hips, and weighed 18000 pounds.
>>219800633
feather dinosaurs is woke
>>219800511Do demons have a point?I intend no blasphemy but what exactly are demons? Angels kicked out of heaven, right? Or is there not a consensus?It seems if angels were kicked out of heaven with no one to torment, they would still exist.
>>219800760Is it woke for modern birds to also have feathers?If not, how do you reconcile that with where they got the feathers from?
>this upsets the balding chuds
>>219797493
>>219799030We will never have AGI nor will we ever have ASI.>>219799321Evolution. Bacteria have short enough lifespans that you can literally see them evolve in real time with a microscope.>>219798735Not only that but the Jurassic films actually explain in-universe that the reason why the cloned dinosaurs aren't scientifically accurate is because frog DNA was used to fill in the gaps of the gene sequences of the cloned dinosaurs. >>219799093Based mammal supremacist.
>>219801237* Evolution is a fact.
>>219796034>doesn't roar, but coo like modern birdsWhat does an 8-ton bird cooing sound like?
>>219796034If a crocodile doesnt coo, why would a T Rex?
>>219802987Because they exist on an entirely different line.
>>219795775>t-rexIt's all fiction. Hence a Spielberg movie to capture your imagination.
>>219798265They overdid it with them Kuato arms. Bulbous head has a similar effect but not as noticeable. In both cases - a hat on a hat.
>>219800760I hate wokery as much as the next guy, but in what way are feathered dinosaurs woke?
>>219801147>tranny flag-colored feathersBravo.
