actually sad. they have nothing else going for them so they resort to nonsense like this while they repress the reality of their actions to protect themselves
>>219854518Who owns the porn industry?
>>219854567
>>219854518i've never understood the sanitized phrase "sleep with">>219854567your mom
>>219854567Jews have nothing to do with this. It’s Athiests that are the problem
>>219854518To be fair, most women in the world aren't exactly "like" Bonnie Blue. But what exactly is the relation to /tv/ of this post?
all women are whores
>>219854638it's going to be televised
>>219854659Even the quiet girl sitting in the back of class?
>>219854518I hope she got beat up by Paki immigrants
>>219854638they're a repressed version of her that still have a sliver of shame.I wouldn't even be surprised if there's a secret (((financier))) with the intention of normalizing hyper-whoredom via BB's stunts, to break away that last sliver in all women.
>>219854567The owner of OnlyFans died of cancer though
>>219854608>Stokely sold a 75 percent stake in OnlyFans' parent company Fenix International to Leonid Radvinsky in 2018.[5][7] Following the acquisition, the platform became increasingly associated with adult content>Radvinsky was born in Odesa on May 30, 1982, to a Jewish family.[1] His family later emigrated to Chicago when he was a child
>>219854518Just do gokkun bitch. That’s the only category where quantity is relevant.
Her only problems are making other women jealous and man angry. All because she can live her life as she deems fit, a whore through and through. And I only know about her because of incels and journalists seething. It's uncanny.
>>219854608>the problem is some people dont believe in literal magic??
>>219854638trying to pass incel rage off as moral concern probably
>>219854518Supposing that even happens I wonder exactly what sort of stunt she has to devise in order to maintain interest afterwards. Stupid bitch.
>>21985451895% of this woman's "stunts" are either outright lies or staged to get (often directly paid for) publicity in the hopes the attention drives money to her porn platforms. She goes away the moment you stop giving her and her enablers any attention.
You aren't thinking about the smell. When the other one (Lily Phillips?) did 100 I think it was mentioned about how bad the room stank. Multiply that by 10 I guess.
>>219855026>95% of this woman's "stunts" are either outright liesI don't believe for a moment she was actually fucked by a thousand men.
>>219854518They're not, this a highly scripted humiliation ritual paid for by jews to demoralize western men by exploiting a mentally ill women, this is low quality off topic content and the fact jannies leave literal garbage like this up proves they should all be purged from their roles
>>219854608Nice try, Chaim.
Because you give her attention, stop giving her attention
>>219854518Funny how they banned porn in the UK but this vile whore and her stunts get shilled endlessly by the UK media
>>219855026>>219855062It really is an egregious and childish lieNo footage of the full event existsThere's no clips with more than 10 or 12 men in themAnd that's before getting into the autism math where if she really did 1,000 guys in twelve hours, each guy had only 43 seconds with her - and that's assuming no breaks, no repositioning, etc.
this bitch should be sentenced by a court of white men to carry 14 white babies in a row with no-c section allowed
>>219854518She's not even that attractive.
Because it makes her more money than you will in your entire lifetime
>>219854965So, the only people disgusted by this shit are incels? Good to know.
>>219855237She's a 10/10 in bongland
>>219855158They didn't ban it, they're requiring I.D.s like a lot of places are now. They are trying to ban step family porn and choking/spitting content. Some opposition has pointed out that it's not even illegal for step-siblings or whatever to get married IRL. Probably going to encourage even more coalburning porn, which already seems even more disproportionate among the U.K. OF whores than even the U.S. ones.As for the shilling, a lot of these tabloids are absolutely being paid by her and her agents to post these things. You'll find plenty of thinly veiled advertorials for OF whores doing nothing notable across the Daily Mail, NYP, etc. Any big Twitter/Insta/social media account mentioning them is almost certainly getting paid. Politicians probably should look into that as it's rarely disclosed.>>219855062>>219855192It would be logistically almost impossible for her to sell that footage widely anyway. Pretty much every monetized porn platform requires you to submit government I.D. to verify consent and ensure participants were of legal age. It would be a gargantuan effort to find 1000 men okay with that.
This thread was moved to >>>/b/948212253
