Will you watch it ?
Perhaps
>>219869138>theatrical cutyeah, with blue filters and removed film grainlolthere's no way Disney releases the sixth film with slave leia
No, if Disney actually cared about anniversaries they would have released episode 7 in May 2017 with an extra year of pre-production on the new trilogy.
>>219869138No. I will never give any more money to star wars or disney.
>>219869138glup shitto is freaking BACK baby!
>>219869138>remove all the garbage added over the last 50 years>charge a premium for it
the obsession with the theatrical cuts of these films is just retarded at this point.
having watched the threatrical cut recently, it's such a minor improvement as to functionally not matter. I guess you save a couple minutes of your time cutting the terrible cgi jabba scene, but that's about it.
>>219869138Is it wrong that yeah I actually do want to see it?I never got to see the originals in theater. (As in the true originals with special edition bullshit thrown. It'd be nice to see it at a new cushy theater with a nice sound system and on the bigscreen. I know I could just watch the Despecialized or 4k77 cuts but it would be nice to actually experience the theater experience with a movie I like. Disney be damned.
>>219869754It ſtems from an obſeſsion with noſtalgia and a wiſh to regreſs in age to a childlike ſtate. Truly embarraſsing imo
>>219869828>Disney be damned.Based. Do it, I'm going to as well.
>>219869138Fuck, no. Special Edition is the version of choice, but even ignoring Lucas' opinion here, the autism over muh theatrical/despecialized/4KXX is just mentally ill.
>>219869906You say this while artistically slobbering on Lucas's dick.
>>219869660remember new coke and coke classic?typical tricks
>>219869931It's his baby + it's the readily available version with significant visual improvements on the upside and some cartoon overkill on the downside. At the end of the day I don't really care.
>>219869892What's wrong with your keyboard
>>219869138I was sure the giant colourful pauldrons were added in the special edition
>>219870037Nigga order his keyboard from the East India Company and it just arrived
>>219870037he has the 1600s firmware
>>219869138Does the ticket money go to Disney?
>Have you rerelease the original trilogy to make any money with Shit Wars at this pointIt’s never been more over kek
>>219870037Have you never heard of the long S? It is a letter that we uſed to write with for centuries, and its loſs in modern uſage is palpable for thoſe who enjoy reading hiſtorical literature.
>>219870113You laugh but the Mando movie will make a billion.
>>219869138No thanks, bro. George Lucas's final vision is the only one that matters.
>>219870156why not ßwitch to ßomething a little more modern? ßurely you ßee the value in it.pêřhãpş țąkë ťhè ňé₹t šțěp.
>>219869138nope
i'd like to. but giving money to disney and sitting in the same room with current year star wars "fans" for 2 hours are huge turn offs. maybe i'll be able to find an afternoon show or something with low turnout.
>>219870070IM DEADNI*GGA SAID EAST INDIA COMPANY
>>219870113They're in the process of course correcting, now that Kennedy is gone. Maul slaps, Mandalorian will in all likelihood be mediocre, inoffensive slop that's "better than expected," and Starfighter has potential, as well as a decent box office outlook. Star Wars can do with henchmen directors, as V and VI have proven, but those henchmen have to execute a real creatives vision. Whether Filoni has that in him remains to be seen.
>>219870306>Whether Filoni has that in him remains to be seen.What that tubby fuck has in him is not something anyone wants
>>219870256¡ʇno siɥʇ ʞɔǝɥƆ
>>219870306unless they make the entire sequels non-canon they haven't course corrected
>>219870037He’s been typing like this in multiple threads, he’s in the Shrek thread right now.How much you want to bet it’s Sethy B the baskin trust fund guy?
>>219870420The Last Jedi was better than the prequel trilogy but go off Mauler fag
>>219870484I like it, but no.
>>219869197>slave leiashe's called Huttslayer
>>219870504>no argument except feelingslol maybe ROTS can be argued as better but TPM and AOTC are indisputably worse
>>219869138yes
>>219870558III =/> IV > I (= VIII) > VI > II > V
>>219870558>TPM and AOTCNo way. To this day, more than 20 years later there's fan content and memes made about episodes I-III, while the sequels are completely dead, even Disney doesn't bother making toys about them.
No. I already saw it and I like the Lucas changes now.
>>219870682Are we in math class or some shit
>>219870696>b-but retards on the internet like itDon’t care. It’s trash.
>>219869138Is there a back story for the portable air conditioners worn by desert troopers?
>>219870396ǹ̸̘̙̺̽̾e̸͙͔͍̽͒͠e̵̺͎͎͋̀͐d̵͍͉̦͌̈́͠e̸̡̢͙̿̿d̵̫̝͋͒̚͜ d̸̼̫̀͊͘u̴̢̠̙͛͑b̵͕͔̽̔͛z̴̡͚̪̚͝͝ r̸̻̙̫̈́̿e̵̢͕̝͆̈́̚a̸̻̠̓͆͑l̵͉͓̟̿̈́͠l̵̺͇̒̔͐ỳ̵͖͚̙͛̒
>>219869311>they needed to LE PLAN the story so Snoke could be Darth Icky like in muh fan theories!!!I hate prequelshitters so much it's unreal
>>219870696prequelzoomers like the movies not because of their actual content, but because they have nostalgia for seeing Revenge of the Sith in theaters with dad when they were three.
>>219871059indeed. but they also have the advantage of having seen the films as children, George is right in part with that angle. I saw them in the cinema when they came out and had been a fan of the originals, I didn't think much of them, for me ewan mctwat was a poor choice and it all felt out of place and forced, fake like a parody.but children seeing it for the first time without really knowing starwars will have just taken it for what it was, and enjoyed the spectacle.never seen any of the sequels because they're designed to shit on the original films
>>219871378>never seen any of the sequels because they're designed to shit on the original filmsThank god you are qualified to speak authoritatively on movies you haven't seen
>>219871378>manchildren like what they saw when they were actual childrenStop the presses, is this true????!!!??!?!?
>>219869197>there's no way Disney releases the sixth film with slave leiawrong
>>219871402/tv/ tells me everything I need to know.
>>219871032>planning out stories is... le bad
>>219870172This is the final vision.
>>219871562Where's the one where Greedo pulls out 2 lightsabers
>>219869138no
Would a star wars fan unironically tell me that the ending of the original ROTJ which ends with them stuck in the teddy bear forest where the teddy bears sing a song is better than the special edition ending that shows the empire being toppled across the galaxy while this banger plays?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=II04E2GEJG8
>>219871562Kino. I wish Lucas had done that just to make obnoxious Star Wars tards seethe and fume until they turn fucking red. Some would probably kill themselves unironically.
>>219871457lol
>>219871729cope
>>219871865Not even the same guy, bro. But I reckon they will try to crop the shot as much as they can.
>>219869138no because I'm not a man child in diapers eating baby food
>>219871562I remember that from the original showing of the film in winter of 1976, just before it was reedited for widespread distribution.
>>219871729They made Harrison Ford look like a monkey in right pic.
>>219871723Aesthetically, the CGI shots of other worlds don't match ROTJ.
