nah it was just a marketing failure
another case of inventors not knowing how to sell their products

>>219870927
they killed themselves.
Every single one always has a decent-strong gimmick that gets squandered in the movie because the writer has to insert melodrama nobody cares about.

>>219874188
Jumper and Handcock. I could watch a 10 season series of the first two acts from both of those movies.

>>219870927
Thank you for reminding me about this gem, I'll watch it again tonight.

>>219874188
Ok but you can't really make an entire movie just with guys playing with their powers.

File: 281731823.jpg (148 KB, 736x1000)

148 KB JPG

yeah we could have gotten more movies like this! (sarcasm)

>>219874985
>movie is based on a power that the protag doesn't even have

>>219870927

>>219876031
What I meant was Max Landis wrote Chronicle

>>219870927
>actually good movie
>written by a psychopathic sex freak
why is this always the case? can normal people not write good movies?