Haven't seen this casting discussed so far. Gotta say, they nailed it for bestgirl Pansy.As long as Rowling doesn't step in and fires her for being too pretty again, I think I might watch it afterall!
>another mystery meat
>>219873246>mystery meatYou don't recognize British people when you see them, anon?
awful, just awful
>>219873246All the post-wall millennial women will be very excited to hear the news I’m sure
>As long as Rowling doesn't step in and fires her for being too pretty again, I think I might watch it afterall!Why do shitskin soillennials keep pushing this fake story?
>>219873451>fake storyWhat makes you think it's fake? And how else do you explain that they fired Genevieve Gaunt and hired some bland-looking slag instead? And why did Rowling end up passive-aggressively naming Voldemort's ancestors "Gaunt" in the latter books?
>>219873323That has jeet blood which means it can't be classified as british, who are white as fuck and burn in the sun and don't have excess hair growing like a monkey around hairline, mouth, and eyebrows, or soulless jet black eyes.
>>219874132>jeet bloodKek. No.>british, who are white as fuckYou've never been to Britain, have you?
>>219873323She's half Thai.
>>219875723>half ThaiBoth halves white then.
>>219873246Sure, I’ll bite. Who the fuck is Pansy Parkinson and why should I care?
>>219876015>Who the fuck is Pansy ParkinsonPansy Parkinson is a Slytherin who hangs out with Draco and his gang, and is usually around when they bully Harry. Mostly in the books though. The films generally have her as a background character. Nonetheless, Genevieve Gaunt, her first actress, looked quite striking in the role. Pic related. Legend has it that Rowling got the actress fired because she looked too good for what was basically a stand-in for Rowling's own childhood bully (a circumstance that makes the character even better).Pansy is generally appreciated by fans because she was the only student bright enough to advocate for selling Harry out to Voldemort in the final battle, so the rest of the school would be spared. Sadly, this highly pragmatic argument of hers was immediately shut down by Minerva McGonagal, which led to many unneeded deaths.
>Malfoy, Crabbe, Goyle are all racist white boys>little brown girl Pansy constantly hangs out with them
>>219876345>brownCome on, anon.
>>219876363>dark hair>dark eyes>olive complexionsorry paland if this also describes you, I got some bad news
>>219874132If the br*tish didn’t want Indians in Britain they shouldn’t have gone to India and said it was Britain. I’ll never feel bad for them.
I see pictures from the set of the Hermione actress. And I don't feel good about her growing into the role. Ron however is gonna hit puberty like a BOSS and probably have bitches all over him.
>>219876410>olive complexionLike Greeks. Mediterranian, therefore white.>if this also describes youNah. I'm a dirty blond, and pale as fuck because I never go outside.
>>219876345they aren't racists, they are classicist and blood purists i.e. they don't like muggle borns and half-bloodsthere have always been non-white slytherin students who are also blood purists and spoiled rich brats
>>219876488She'll be fineHermione isn't supposed to be beautiful anyway. The perception of her looking good is just fan head-canon and influence from the films. Book Hermione is literally unremarkable looks wise.The characters that is actually supposed to be stunningly beautiful are Ginny and the two Delacour sisters.
>>219876511>they are classicistYou mean "classist"? "Classicist" would mean they are enthousiastic about Homer, Shakespeare, Mozart and Michelangelo.
>>219876695>supposed to be stunningly beautiful are GinnyGinny is athletic and energetic, but more Gryffindoor's resident school bike rather than a stunning beauty. Reminder that the books give us the viewpoint of Harry, who suddenly starts being horny for her when her description becomes more complimentary. Just like Ching Chong had that brief period of being talked up by the narration when Harry had the hots for her.
>>219876490>Like Greeks. Mediterraniannot white
>>219876839No. It's made clear in the books that Ginny is popular amongst the boys. She's pretty, smart, and ballsy. We actually get a toned down version of her because of Harry's perspective, he's way too distracted to notice her for a long time, but the rest of his classmates do and they make comments on it.
>>219877026Ancient Greeks literally considered the cradle of European ("white") civilization, anon.
>>219877093>It's made clear in the books that Ginny is popular amongst the boys.See>Gryffindoor's resident school bikeBeing popular amongs the boys, particularly at that age, just means she's an easy lay.
>>219877093>t's made clear in the books that Ginny is popular amongst the boys.I don't know if you were homeschooled or what, but girls like that topped out at about 7/10 in terms of being prettyMaybe they'd have a killer body or something But there's obviously a reason Ginny is a jock and it's not because she's secretly the prettiest girl at school
>>219877122not white
>>219877140She's had a grand total of two boyfriendsDean and Harry. It would have been one boyfriend since she's had a crush on Harry since book one but again Harry didn't give a damn about her until she started helping him win quidditch matches.>>219877143your inceldom has nothing to do with what's in the books
>>219877172Again: Considered white European by everyone but you. You're American, aren't you?
>>219877311>She's had a grand total of two boyfriendsRight. And how many flings?
>>219876256She aged good
>>219877363Yeah. Easily the best of all the actors, the girls at least.
>>219877311>ur an incelsorry you can't tell the difference between a lacrosse girl and a cheerleader but most other people can, retard
>>219877342like how you consider this girl: >>219873246 to be white?
>>219873246This is an AI image.
>>219877450I'll take that as a confirmation that you are indeed American.>>219877559That's literally an official photo released by HBO with the cast announcement. Here's the other one of hers, with some other Slytherin actors.
>>219877631>still thinks the ambiguous race brown girl is white
>>219877647>still is American
>>219873543Hahahahahahaha! Holy shit. I never put two and two together but you’re absolutely right! How old was this actress when she mind broke Rowling just by existing near her? 14? 15? Unbelievable. Absolutely mind boggling levels of personality disorder on display there.
>>219877432Not every cheerleader looks like a supermodel and not every athlete looks like shrek
>>219877653>ESL>said he was "dirty blonde"So, you're from some Eurocuck country where you look at: >>219873246 and say "she's white" and not "I wonder if she's mexican"
>>219877706no, autist, but stereotypes exist for a reason and ginny literally spends a year with a black guy before hitching her wagon to harry, and coincidentally she's also really big into sports
>>219873246>adult children still obsessed with this faggoty kid shit
>>219877711>"I wonder if she's mexican"Yep. You're an American mindbroken by your society's lack of cultural identity.
>>219877738still doesn't change what is printed in the booksshe's the prettiest girl in the schoolpeople lack imagination, we wouldn't even be having this conversation had they actually picked an appropriately pretty girl to play her in the movie.
>>219877815Better than being obsessed with Star Wars or capeshit, really. At least Harry Potter is somewhat decently written (and directed, for most of the films) for teen literature.
>>219877816>"that brown is white, anon"still no
>>219877837>she's the prettiest girl in the schoolWhere in the books does it ever say that? Even with Harry's perspective, I don't think it ever went this far.
>>219877861Slytherins briefly talk about her. They fucking hate Weasleys, since they are all blood traitors, but she's hot enough that even they can't talk trash about her.
>>219876427Retard, they were fighting off the Russians
How about the baddie playing one of the Patel sisters?
>>219878111>she's hot enoughDoesn't make her the prettiest girl in school.
>>219878172I wonder if she's playing both, it's weird that there's still only one listed officially
>>219878172>How about the baddie playing one of the Patel sisters?The Italian girl?
>>219876256>Pansy is generally appreciated by fans because she was the only student bright enough to advocate for selling Harry out to Voldemort in the final battle, so the rest of the school would be spared. Sadly, this highly pragmatic argument of hers was immediately shut down by Minerva McGonagal, which led to many unneeded deaths.Its amazingly funny how true this is.
>>219878724also considering harry gives himself like 90 minutes later
>>219878724>give Harry over to Voldemort>Voldy kills Harry>immediately diesPansy would have been a hero.
>>2198776312" depth of field on completely flat background. Eyes lack detail, face lacks expression and the lighting is from one side.Now you could claim this is a specific lighting test photo they do to explain away most of that but then there are identical images for everyone.
is every character a brown?absolute state of bongland
>>219879194It's a press photo, and, yes, it's shit. There's similar photos with the other houses' side actors as well. So my assumption is that they just quickly got them all together in (their own?) casual clothes and photographed them in what looks like the King's Cross station set. Maybe they all were present to film the departure scene there. Pretty sure the photo session was an afterthought, and that's why it looks like this.
>>219877631why are they all 19 and not 10
Total Mutt Death
>>219873246>brownffs
>>219879692They're Slytherins. They need to look like the "cool older kids".Serious answer: Pansy's actress is apparently 13. Still technically too old, but not quite as much as you said.As for the others, I think some of them aren't supposed to be first-years.
>>219876488>Ron however is gonna hit puberty like a BOSS and probably have bitches all over him.He's ginger. That's never gonna happen for a soulless potato faced husk.
>>219876488>And I don't feel good about her growing into the role.looking at her, I feel very good about how she'll grow
>>219876427>If the br*tish didn’t want Indians in Britain they shouldn’t have gone to India and said it was Britain. I’ll never feel bad for them.Technically, a private corporation took over India, to the supposed annoyance of the British Government, and then the British Government later nationalized that private corporation, making India a British territory. One of the Flags used as the basis for the Flag of the United States, was actually the East India Company flag, just with the top corner replaced by the blue with stars, rather than the original design that had an English Saint George’s Cross in that area.
>>219876256>>219878724Will the new series adapt Harry and Pansy's post-Hogwarts romance?I'm sure they'll drop the plot point about Hermione being a secret pureblood (Theodore Nott's sister), but they could keep this.
>>219873246damn those freckles got me hard
>>219877843lol, no. Harry Potter is even more low than capeshit and Star Wars. And with significantly more foids and trannies.
>>219880185Funny how this reads exactly like AI shit. Guess those large-language-models were all trained on fanfiction archives?
>>219880241>even more lowI think the word you're looking for is "lower".I dare not ask what books you read as a teen.
>>219880278Nobody read books anymore, unc.
>>219877140>>219877861It doesn't happen, but Pansy Parkinson makes it clear when she's discussing Ginny that she's universally popular among boys. The obvious implication is she's the hot girl. Your argument is wrong and unnecessary.
>>219880414>universally popular among boys. >The obvious implication is she's the hot girl. that's not the obvious implicationthe obvious one would be more like she's quick to give a blowjob
>>219879458oh dear god...
>>219880461It's the obvious interpretation in the scene in the book that Rowling wrote, in the world she created. The teenagers of YA fiction are not generally representative of real teenagers. Why do you care so much whether Ginny is interpreted as being very attractive? The text says she is. Just accept the simplest solution.
>>219880560>The teenagers of YA fiction are not generally representative of real teenagers.Ah, yes. Because real teenagers wouldn't want to read books with characters that relate to them.>The text says she is. Just accept the simplest solution.You literally admitted yourself that it doesn't, and that it was merely your interpretation.
>>219880658>Ah, yes. Because real teenagers wouldn't want to read books with characters that relate to them.No most people wouldn't want to read books about typical teenagers acting normally. >admitted it doesn't Rowling doesn't have a character flat-out describe Ginny as the "prettiest girl in school," but it's made clear through the Slytherins seething and Harry's intense (for the HP universe) lust. She's meant to be attractive. I never personally said prettiest girl in the school, but Rowling barely ever really hierarchically determined that in her worldbuilding. We know one of Harry's friends considers the Patil twins to be the prettiest girls in the year, or something. Fleur is the only character who's really described as always being extremely beautiful.
>>219876490>Bongs are calling mudslims white nowTruly the worst
>>219875870Too obvious. Apply yourself.
>>219880760>No most people wouldn't want to read books about typical teenagers acting normally.Teenagers are fucking crazy. Hormonally imbalanced immature retards. Of course people want to read about them. Makes for both good drama and good comedy.>it's made clear through the Slytherins seething and Harry's intense (for the HP universe) lust.It just means that she's not outright ugly. But you can make the same argument (Harry's lust) for Ching Chong.Anything further than that is indeed interpretation. Annd the interpretation that she's simply a slut explains just as well, if not better, why she'd be popular with the boys.
>>219880802>Greeks are muslimsAmerican education, everyone.
>>219881027>Teenagers are fucking crazy. Hormonally imbalanced immature retards. Of course people want to read about them. Makes for both good drama and good comedy.Well I don't think very many popular series or media in literature or television ever do depict them. >you can make the same argument Chang is also supposed to be a very pretty girl.
>>219881100>missing the point that hard while trying to be condescending
>>219881124>missing the pointYes, you were. Read the post you replied to. Nobody was talking about muslims.
>>219881155the man saying the girl who looks like an arab (and may actually be muslim if she is half-thai like a different post says) looks "white" is wrongthat's the point, and you need to admit to being wrong about the girl looking whiteshe doesn't look white
>>219881103>Well I don't think very many popular series or media in literature or television ever do depict them."Teen literature" and "Young adult books" do. Hell, not only those. They're all over TV: Remember Dawsons Creek? Technically all teenagers, just played by twentysomethings. Buffy the Vampire Slayer, the same. The OC. Twin Peaks. Riverdale. Pretty Little Liars. Just to name a few.>Chang is also supposed to be a very pretty girl.Says Harry at least. And she seems to sleep around less than Ginny. That's something.
>>219873246>mightKey word lmao you won't watch shit.
>>219881217>girl who looks like an arabYou should have your eyes checked. Seriously.Not everyone who isn't as pale as a vampire is non-white. Somehow you Americans really don't seem to get how much variety there is in white Europeans, with or entirely without foreign heritage.
>>219881269>"Teen literature" and "Young adult books" do. Hell, not only those. They're all over TV: Remember Dawsons Creek? Technically all teenagers, just played by twentysomethings. Buffy the Vampire Slayer, the same. The OC. Twin Peaks. Riverdale. Pretty Little Liars. Just to name a few.None of these things depict realistic teenagers though. >Says Harry Harry only lusts after two girls in the entire series: Cho and Ginny. He's barely impacted by Fleur and I can't think of one other instance of him showing any sign of interest in anyone else.
>>219881308>this girl is whiteno
>>219881405Every single one of these threads contains weird shilling about how everyone brown is actually white. It's very strange. Apparently the girl playing Hermione is white too, which she is not.
>>219881334>None of these things depict realistic teenagers though.Define "realistic". As I said before, teenagers are fucking mental. Yeah, Buffy or Riverdale don't exactly depict typical everyday situations. But the characters are pretty much what you'd expect teenagers to be - within reason, of course: They do follow character arcs like any fictional character would.>Harry only lusts after two girls in the entire series: Cho and Ginny.Yes. But as I stated way earlier: It's exactly when Harry falls into lust for them that the narrator starts describing them with seemingly rose-tinted glasses. In Ching's case, that stops as soon as Harry's over her. And even then, Ginny is never outright described as outstandingly pretty.
>>219881405Literally is. Sorry, anon, but how fucking pale do you think everyone in Europe is?
>>219881440>Ginny is never outright described as outstandingly pretty.>In Ching's case, that stops as soon as Harry's over her. We can assume Cho is attractive not only because Harry likes her, but because she also dated the prom king chad archetype sports jock character who every other girl liked. These things are based partially on subtext. Both of the girls are unusually pretty according to the book. Good day to you.
>>219881481>based partially on subtext>according to the bookYou do see the contradiction here, don't you?Subtext and text are different. The latter is an objective fact you can point to. The former is dependent on your interpretation. That's my whole point: You need to make that difference and accept that other people might come to different conclusions via their own interpretations.
>>219881469>Literally isNoAnd let's not forget the initial point was she'd be a little brown girl hanging out with Malfoy, Crabbe, and Goyle, who are all whiteSuper white, evenWhereas she is a little brown girl, brown as in not white, brown as in you'd look at her and say "brown" and not "white" like you would for the three white boysBecause everyone except you looks at this girl and thinks: arab, mexican, or some other kind brown
>>219881469>but how fucking pale do you think everyone in Europe is?NTA but I think of europe as being full of brown people who get treated like actual europeans when they're all a few decades removed from living in a thatch hut somewherelet me know when you all stop calling saudi kid fuckers "asian"
>>219881559Boy in the bottom left is barely lighter-skinned than her, anon. Why do you Americans not understand that her skintone is lighter than what you'd find anywhere in southern Europe, and pretty common in natives in central/western Europe (Britain, France, Belgium, Germany, Netherlands, Switzerland, Poland, etc.)?Can you really not tell the difference just because basically everyone in your country is "mixed"?
>>219881539There is no justification for your interpretation that Ginny is not especially attractive when she is repeatedly demonstrated as being not just very attractive to Harry but also many other characters. >she's just easy No one in Harry Potter has sex until they get married and procreate immediately, and that is canon.
>>219881658>Boy in the bottom left is barely lighter-skinned than herthe boy in the bottom left is the palest one, you fucking blind brownoid retard
>>219881658Do you see any difference between her and boy in bottom left regarding hair and eye tone?
>>219881559also all these kids look awful for any role in this
>>219881661>no justification for your interpretation that Ginny is not especially attractivThere is, considering the text never says that she is.>demonstrated as being [...] very attractive to [...] many other characters. Which characters? None of them state that she is. She does have one other "boyfriend", but that's it.>No one in Harry Potter has sex until they get married>that is canonWhat? Where in the books does it say that?
>>219881728how? crabbe and goyle are supposed to be retards and one or both is supposed to be fatthey're some of the better ones in terms of looks for their roles
>>219881730>what characters Pansy Parkinson teases a group of Slytherins about how hot she is in the 6th book. >one boyfriend Two. I forgot Michael Corner as well, but Ginny's "serial dating" is a heated point that comes up between her and Ron and I knew at one point Ron reacts badly to the news that Ginny has a new boyfriend in their year, having broken up with another one.
>>219881692>the boy in the bottom left is the palest oneAh, it's another "anon does not understand lighting" episode. Classic. No, he's not the palest. He's the one with the lowest contrast lighting, i.e. soft ambient light, with little to no colour temperature.>>219881697>regarding hair and eye tone?Are you seriously trying to argue that whites cannot be brunette now? Really?
I hope it's clear to everyone that the guy sperging out about how ginny is the most attractive girl in the series is also the one who thinks brown pansy parkinson is white
>>219881774I guess... man look at Malfoy what the fuck were they thinking. Even minus all the pointless brownening shitting up the cast the original are just so much better on every single character I can't see this project converting everyone.
>>219881793>Pansy Parkinson teases a group of Slytherins about how hot she isPretty sure another anon already shut that argument down before.>"serial dating"See, that's not what I'd call having serious relationships. Which brings us back to the "sleeping around" interpretation.
>>219881803or it's not lighting and the two blonde kids have simply been to the beach before whereas the pale boy hasn't and the girl is still brown like a mexican/arab/native american/half indian/half jungle asian/half upper african/generally nonwhite person and not a white person
>>219881803>Are you seriously trying to argue that whites cannot be brunette now? Really?nigger, the boy with brown hair looks whitethe girl looks like an ethnic of some kind
>>219881834They "shut it down" by insisting if a character doesn't literally say, out loud, "so and so is the most attractive girl at our wizards school" you can't infer that she's very attractive. >>219881808No I think all the characters are nonwhite. In Harry Potter there are I think 7 nonwhite characters out of hundreds.
>>219881830>look at Malfoy what the fuck were they thinking.They're a pretty similar phenotype, actually.The whole difference is 2000s millenial teen (born ca. 1990) vs. 2020s gen alpha teen (born ca. 2010). You simply won't find any teenager nowadays that looks and carries himself like the old Draco did.
Doesn’t the high presence of non whites and mixed students mean the British wizards partook in colonisation during the British empire? How else can you explain the disproportionate non white presence in the 1990’s in hogwarts?
>>219881841>or it's not lightingIf you know anything about photography, then, yes, you'll notice that it is lighting.
>>219881901The curly hair and totally different expression of face... I don't know what you'd really call that, but ya young Tom Felton just looks perfect for the role. >The whole difference is 2000s millenial teen (born ca. 1990) vs. 2020s gen alpha teen (born ca. 2010). You simply won't find any teenager nowadays that looks and carries himself like the old Draco did.What do you think explains this?
>>219881901tom felton is based, if you watch the 20th anniversary special thing they did he kind of steals the show because he has the best casting story where he pretended he knew all about film sets and acted like a dick toward all the other kids, specifically one girl who he insult (who turned out to be Emma Watson) And it's revealed that Emma was in love with him immediately after that meeting, and kind of still is to this daythe stories about how Jason Isaacs was a psycho and wounded him during filming are great too
>>219881888>you can't infer that she's very attractiveYou can infer whatever you like. The thing is that you cannot say that it is therefore a necessary conclusion from the text and that everyone who infers differently must therefore be wrong.
>>219881923oh so it's the lighting that makes the girl look brown and the boys all look white, I seeit's not that the boys would've been drafted into youth roles in the reich while the girl would've been put in a camp for being a brown gypsy, no it's just lighting
>>219881940Apparently it was Isaac's idea for Lucius to wear a long blonde wig and dress like an aristocrat when the original costuming was like a business man with short hair. I'm not sure though I feel like Rowling was pretty involved with the casting and costumes when they were making the 2nd movie.
>>219881935>What do you think explains this?Culture, upbringing, other environmental variables. Different generations have always expressed themselves differently from what came before them.
>>219881950It's a necessary conclusion from the text intended by the author.
>>219881966>oh so it's the lighting that makes the girl look brownNo, that's your twisted sense of what you think "brown" means.
>>219881971yeah, originally he was almost more like a yuppie or something and basically everything about lucius' look in the movie was his ideaof course kicking dobby and trying to murder harry right outside of dumbledore's office were his ideas, too
>>219882010If the movies kept the director of the first 2 I think it'd be one of the best film series of all time. Everything past 2 sucks in comparison. And this series is going to be awful.
>>219881991>intended by the author.This keeps getting funnier and funnier. How the fuck do you think you know what Rowling intended? Are you her?By the way: Even if it was intended; if it's not in the text, it's not in the text.
>>219882007>No, that's your twisted sense of what you think "brown" means.yescalling the girl who is literally brown "brown" rather than "white"how twistedhere she is in a clothing ad where she's so visibly white, she can portray the role of a girl whose dad is black
>>219882035It's in the text. But who cares lol? Interpret Ginny however you like.
buy an ad mod protected pedo tranny samefag
>>219882062>whose dad is blackAnd the mother in that pic? Black as well? Because she has pretty much the same skintone as her. Or, hear me out, maybe that photoshoot wasn't really cast with your American racial stereotyping in mind?
>>219882066>It's in the text.You already said yourself that it is not. That you needed to "interpret" and "infer".
>>219882099So, by your standards, a half-black girl would also be white.
>>219882113>“A lot of boys like her,” said Pansy, watching Malfoy out of the corner of her eyes for his reaction. “Even you think she’s good-looking, don’t you, Blaise, and we all know how hard you are to please!” -Ch 7, The Slug Club, HBP Also indicated by Harry's textual lust for her
>>219882114Can you read? Because apparently you didn't read my post at all.
>>219882145>“Even you think she’s good-looking, don’t you, Blaise,"I bet he does
>>219882154the tan white woman with white people facial features and blue eyes is whitethe little brown girl isn'tyou claimed to be white at some point, this shouldn't be so difficult for you
>>219882145Literally does not say she's outstandngly pretty, much less "prettiest girl of the school". Merely "good looking", which is a much weaker descriptor than what you so far claimed in this thread.But, hey, if that's what you want to settle on, I'm fine with that compromise.
They released a report in Europe that calls "Europeanness" xenophobic and racist and a concept that has to be removed ASAP.https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/sep/25/eu-moving-towards-more-xenophobic-view-of-europeanness-report-warnsSo sorry dude Europe is for everyone except whites.
>>219882184>with white people facial featuresYou're really trying too hard at this point. This really isn't going to go anywhere with you, is it?
>>219882185I wasn't the person who initially described her as the prettiest girl in the school. I just wanted to say that the books do clearly indicate that Ginny is unusually pretty. This is fan consensus as well. You can disagree and be very outspoken about it but I don't know why you would.
>>219882209>white people don't have specific facial features Is this why you said that super pale white kid was "barely lighter-skinned" than the girl who doesn't fucking look white, you fucking reatd?
>>219882223>indicateYou know what, I can live with "indicate". As long as you don't discount other interpretations. What do you say?
>>219873246She cute. I'm supposed to be mad about this?
>>219882465Sounds good buddy. We all have our headcanons too.
>>219882471>I'm supposed to be mad about this?No. But J.K. Rowling probably will be.
>>219882533how involved is Rowling with this new show?
>>219881658>Boy in the bottom left is barely lighter-skinned than herAre you retarded?
>>219882665no, he's just european
>>219882555No idea. I'm sure that HBO will downplay any involvement though, considering how controversial Rowling has become with her own fanbase.
>>219882687sem ting, m8
>>219882555she's one of the producers of the show
>>219883405Doesn't really answer anon's question. "Producer" can mean basically anything, from someone micromanaging a project to what amounts to a honorary position.
>>219881274>you won't watch shit.I definitely won't pay for it. But pirating and then watching it on the side while doing something else? Why not?
>>219883785because it looks bad
>>219883955Meh. If I watched nothing that looks bad, there'd be barely anything I could possibly watch from the last 20 years.
>>219882533>But J.K. Rowling probably will be.like fuck she will. she's all for raceswaps and faggotry, she just draws the line at trannies
>>219883457It's probably similar to the role she had for the movies. She gives the final okay on most of what they want to do. Grrm does the same thing for all of his HBO shows. 9/10 times they will agree on the changes unless the show runners want to do something insane like have Snape molest Draco or some shit.
>>219876511Yeah, racism in the sense of skin color doesn't exist in the wizard world. They probably think it's one of those weird muggle things.
>>219881100>Greeks arent all turk rapebabiesGreek delusion, everyone
>>219880185>lot point about Hermione being a secret pureblood (Theodore Nott's sister)Thats fanfiction>>219880185definitely fanfiction
I dont care if she is white or notShe is cute and should have dated me when i was a kid and she should have magically been the same age
>off topic shitskin tranny nigger race spam
>>219877363Scarlett turned out quite a beauty as well.
>>219881559>mexicanWe have Spanish people in Europe and we call them white. Arabs are also sometimes considered white. You are a retarded Amerimutt and your bloodline and mental faculties are polluted by generations of interbreeding with niggers and indians.
>>219880760>Fleur is the only character who's really described as always being extremely beautiful.No!Sirius and Tom are more commonly noted by Harry to be attractive.
>>219873246Pansy Pakison
>>219886357She definitely looks better than she looked back in the films. To be fair, they probably made her look more blaad on-screen to avoid another forced recast.
>>219887625>Sirius and Tom are more commonly noted by Harry to be attractive.That's because Harry is a closeted gay, obviously. Hadn't it been for Hermione, he'd probably ended up with Ron. But that wasn't meant to be. So he did the next best thing and got with Ron's sister.
>>219887463She's not Spanish, shes a half asian mutt. Most Spaniards (not sudacas) are paler than her. These d&c threads are getting desperate.
>>219889750>half asianAnd yet all the Americans in here called her "brown". Funny, isn't it? They can't even tell Asians from Africans but we're supposed to trust them on this whole issue.
>>219876363>>brown>Come on, anon.
>>219889890Oh, so you were just talking about eye colour all this time?
>>219889944That anon wasn't me. I was pointing out that only a brown person (e.g. brown eye, brown skin) could consider THIS >>219881405 white. Picrel represents the range of phenotypes of white people. If you don't look like either one, you aren't white (i.e. European).
>>219890073>I was pointing out thatYou were pointnig out brown eyes. Apparently you think white people can't have those?
>>219873246All i know i she wants that white blond d
>>219890144White people can't have brown eyes, no. All Western Hunter Gather finds have had blue eyes. If you have brown eyes you have substantial EEF DNA . That is, Anatolian farmer. That is, non-white. It's really quite simple. Also, most Europeans have more recent genetic contamination as well. Picrel. From a strict perspective there are probably no true white people left. From a more lenient perspective there are a few million. From no perspective whatsoever is that creature white.
>>219890261>White people can't have brown eyes, no.American "education", everyone!
>>219876488Feel ron will be a bit of a fatty and doesn't have good bone structure harry in the other hand is going to be a chad and surely taller than 5'3 this time
>>219886357I've seen her naked. Her tits are disappointing
>>219890360>American "education", everyone!It's not my fault your parents race mixed. It's not a value judgement. I'm sure you're a perfectly good whatever you are. But you aren't white.
>>219890382>I've seen her nakedEveryone has (and her tits are fine, really).Genevieve is the one we desperately need nudes of.
>>219890410>Mexican.pngCase in point. You guys are obsessed with Mexicans and "race mixing". Don't you find it funny that you guys always get into arguments with Europeans over what it means to be ethnically European?
>>219881830Felton was ugly af and had orange hair he never gave natural blond even as a kid i keep noticing the awful dyeing . the new one is celts decendent hes as whire as i gets
>>219890574>Felton was ugly afI wouldn't know. I never was into little boys.The new one looks like your average zoomer though.
>>219876427This. Britishers are so stupid
>>219879458Might as well post Ravenclaw.
>>219892595And Hufflepuff. Does anybody even care about Hufflepuff?
>>219892595#2 ;o;
>>219890505She isn't white friend.
>>219892987>#2Apparently that's Eve Walls as Lisa Turpin.Who Lisa Turpin is? I have no fucking idea.Her wikia page has a literal Lego figure as her character portrait:https://harrypotter.fandom.com/wiki/Lisa_Turpin
>>219877311>She's had a grand total of two boyfriendsWhat about Michael Corner? Fucking lorelet.
clicked on this 200 reply thread hoping for much more thirsting for little girls and not autistic arguments
>>219876363She might be considered "white passing" in the US but not in any other country
>>219893284You know how it is, anon.HBO Harry Potter thread -> Americans seething over white girls not looking white enoughany Harry Potter thread -> people arguing about muh lore
>>219893302>but not in any other country>t. US American
Granger, Patil, Turpin: overnight detention, my office!>yes, Professor Snape...
>>219893361Did you have a point?
>>219890457>and her tits are fine, reallyShe doesn't have any tits
>>219889883>she's half "asian">people are calling her brownyesyou're aware SEAniggers are called SEAniggers for a reason, right
>>219894079Yes, that you have no fucking idea what "other countries" consider white. Bullshit phrases like "white passing" is not even something anyone but you completely mindfucked yankees would ever utter.
>>219894151>She doesn't have any titsAnd that's a good thing. Flatties always age gracefully. Titcows never do.
>you're american if you think this brown girl isn't whiteokay
>>219893302she'd be considered "white passing" by darker darkies as a cope because she's not as ugly as they are, but she wouldn't be considered white by white peopleI'm a white person, she visibly not white
>>219894254you're whole tired-ass europoint might've worked if you weren't calling the little brown girl white, which is a classic euro-cuck opinion that undermines any sort of condescension you're attempting
>>219894395>which is a classic euro-cuck opinionYou do know where whites come from, right?You're the one with all the black and mexican heritage, not us.
>>219894310>I'm a white personYou're American. You're anything but white.
>>219894540Again.You're saying this girl: >>219881405 is white. She isn't. Spamming "you're american" over and over is total nonsense. The girl is not white.You're saying shit like >what, you think half asian girls are brown?Yes. Everyone does. Especially when they have fucking brown skin like their "asian" mom lived a tree in the jungles of Vietnam.What part of this do you not understand?
>>219894629I'm whiter than the brown girl you're calling white, so stop handing me victories.
>>219887463>arabs are also sometimes considered white No >im le european We know you guys are inundated nonstop with propaganda about how white people don't exist and aren't indigenous to anywhere but it's not something to be proud of
>>219887463>we have we have we havenobody caresthe girl looks like a little mexican girl
>>219894641>Spamming "you're american" over and over is total nonsense.It's not, because it's always accurate. Ask any European and they'll consider this girl white. It's always you guys who don't actually know the difference.>>219894657>I'm whiter than the brown girl you're calling whiteKek. See, that's your real motivation. Projecting your own identitiy insecurities onto little girls.
>>219894254I know for a fact that no one from nordic countries would consider her white
>>219892595>>219892616>In Harry Potter books 96% of characters are white >In Harry Potter films 90% of characters are white In this series I guess 20% are white?
>>219894806>Ask any European and they'll consider this girl whitethis is proving the point that you're retardedthe girl with brown skin isn't white, anyone who thinks she's white is incorrect and like (you) said would also consider arabs to be white and other shit like thatat this point you've already been informed she's part asian and you're still trying to call her whiteI legitimately don't know what your issue is but you're simply wrong and you keep making it worse for yourselfremember when you said she was only "a few shades darker" than the boy on the bottom left here: >>219881559 ?you're delusional
>>219894813>no one from nordic countriesAnd what do you know about "northern countries" exactly? Oh, right, nothing. Have you ever even visited one?
>>219894871>with brown skinWell, this isn't "brown skin". So your point is moot.
>>219894913>this: >>219873246 isn't brown skindelusional
>>219873246Cute white girl
>>219894887>>219894913You've been at this for like 19 hours. The girl isn't white. Shut the fuck up. She looks about as Indian as the girl playing Patil in this photo >>219890235Indians and South Asians are not white. You've already said you think Arabs are white. Whitness is a real thing. You're not just white because you speak English.
>>219894984>You've been at this for like 19 hours.So have you. Completely mindfucked by your race theory bullshit.
>>219895055NTA but I posted a joke about how she'll be a little brown girl hanging out with three racist white boys last night, and I have since gone to sleep and woken up this morning, it is now the afternoonYou sperged out at the suggestion that the brown girl was brown and have seemingly been here ever sinceYou have problems and the fact that you think brown people are white is only one of them.
>>219895113>I posted a joke about how she'll be a little brown girlNot particularly funny. But you obviously have a rather uncultivated sense of humour.
>>219895055I'm a different person than the people you've been fighting with this whole time. You actually need to just shut the fuck up and probably get some glasses. This isn't that hard.
>>219895113There are people doing this nonstop in every single one of these hbo potter threads. It's bizarre so I just assume they're paid posters.
>>219895209>not particularly funnyyes, because you have a weird specific strain of autism where you go berserk if someone says someone isn't white when they don't look whiteand you're european, as you've proudly spammed, so I bet this happens toy you all the time, because for you, arabs and half-thai and brown goblins from romania and swarthy pirates on the aegean sea are all white, even though they're all literally brown
>>219895212>I'm a different person thanI'm fully aware that there's a few race-obsessed Americans in here, yes. These HBO HP threads attract you like flies. Guess it has to do with the Snape casting, mainly.But just so you know, I'm not the only one you've been fighting with either.
>>219895328>I'm not the only oneYes, you are.You're the only one who's been dug-in about this little brown girl being white. It's just you.
>>219895328The one spamming about "americans" (you) has made all the posts about brown people actually being white ITT.
>>219895355>Yes, you are.Keep telling that to yourself.>>219895408>The one spamming about "americans" (you)Also more than one person.Meanwhile, the guy who claimed that Greeks are muslims (you) has been spamming his bullshit all over the thread as well.
>>219895466>Meanwhile, the guy who claimed that Greeks are muslims (you)No, not meAnd yes all those posts were you. I guess you'll just reply to everything because you make 5 cents a post or something. Sad.
>>219895466>keep telling yourself thatYou're telling me that.The little brown girl is brown.
>>219895482>No, not meSo much for you getting the joke.
>>219895535Ya, great joke. Go get eye surgery now and come back later.
>>219895535>jokethe joke here is you constantly saying >Americans don't even know what white iswhile at the same time saying>Arabs and Chinese people are white and as a true european I'm the expert on the subject
>>219894813As a Norwegian i can say this is true
>>219873246i cannot wait to see who will play luna lovegood lol
>>219895557>Arabs and Chinese people are whiteLiterally nowhere did I say this. Some guy said something about Arabs possibly being considered white at one point. I disagree about that.Anyway. You race-obsessed morons started this shitlinging in the first place. This thread wasn't about "muh brown girl" to begin with.
>>219895650>This thread wasn't about "muh brown girl" to begin with.You actually think this thread about how yet another white harry potter character is being played by a nonwhite actor is not about race?You really do have some kind of perception-based autism.
>>219894871He's some kind of non-nigger shitskin that's mindbroken by Whites. I'm pretty sure he's made this same argument in previous threads about the other mutts they've cast.
>>219895587You don't consider this to be White? You're obviously American.
>>219895699>this thread about how yet another white harry potter character is being played by a nonwhite actorMaybe you should read the OP? Nowhere does it say anything like that. Pansy Parkinson is not even canonically defined as white, while the actress most definitely is a white British girl.Yet you came here and started screeching about "muh brown girl".
>>219895718>muh mexicanUtterly mindbroken.And yes, if you bring up mexicans of all people, which have nothing to do with the British and are not even mixed into European in any significant capacity, you do out yourself as an American.
>>219895587I'm Welsh and she'd easily be considered "nu-British" here. There are real Britons who don't look Nordic but that tends to be because they have dark curly hair. They don't look like they rode in from Kazakhstan.
>>219895751>Pansy Parkinson is not even canonically defined as whiteWe're not going to get into another 6 hour discussion of how you think Ginny is the prettiest girl at hogwarts based on nothing, sorry.But it's interesting that you're saying>she was never defined as whiteWhen your point is that the little brown girl is white.But like I said, you have autism. This thread was made with the intention of pointing out that another character will now be brown.
>>219895784>which have nothing to do with the BritishNeither does Thailand. I was just posting the first mutt picture I found.
As always I side with Asuka.
>>219895784>If you bring up MexicansPeople are bringing up Mexicans because the girl looks like she could be Mexican. Because she's brown. I know you've never even seen a Mexican person in real life, but you're retarded, and show her face to anyone normal on the street and tell them her last name is Garcia, and they're gonna spazz out about how that's impossible like you apparently would.
>>219895799>When your point is that the little brown girl is white.You repeating this over and over doesn't make it true.>>219895840>the girl looks like she could be MexicanAnd this is where you completely disqualify yourself for this discussion.
>>219895789>There are real Britons who don't look NordicBritons never looked nordic to begin with.
>>219895840He brought up Spain previously, which has a major sudaca problem. It's not like there aren't Mexicans shitting up Europe right now. People don't think they're actually Spanish.
>>219895883>And this is where you completely disqualify yourself for this discussion.yeah, these types of girls look nothing alike you fucking utter retard
>>219895901Yes but that's irrelevant to the point at hand. I'm not going to retype the book of invasions every time I mention the phenotypes that exist in the isles.
>>219895940Would the one on the right. The one on the left should be mowing my grass.
>>219895883>You repeating this over and over doesn't make it true.of course not, but the part where it's a factual observation does make it true
>>219895940They don't look much alike. Somewhat similar eye colur. Different skin tone, different hair, most notabily: different features. But let me guess: Anything darker than utterly pale is just the same colour to you?
>>219895998Yeah, left looks like she has less European blood.
>>219895940Nobody with shit coloured eyes is white.
>>219896032are you white
>>219895998>Anything darker than utterly pale is just the same colour to you?brown is brownnotice no one ever called her black, because she doesn't look blackand you're the only one calling her white, because she doesn't look whitefor the 100th time, we know you have autism, but Arab, Mexicans, Desert Jews, little brown Asians from the jungle, people from Peru, ancient Incas, Native American tribesmen, Indians, half-black people who only look kinda black, "persians", Borat-type people, Hawaiians, Moroccans and Egyptians, etcThese are ALL brown
>>219895824Just for curiosity's sake: I'd say she's securely between the second and third of those strips.
>>219896072>between she's literally the third one
>>219896065>brown is brownThis is your brain on the American branch of nazi race-theory.
>>219896098>you're a nazi if you think pacific islanders aren't whiteEurope has spoken
>>219896098In my country we would call her "Zigeuner"
>>219896129>you're a naziLearn to read. Your race theory is nazi-derived. That doesn't mean you share the whole political ideology.
>>219896149>it's a Nazi belief to think Asian people aren't whitehilarious
>>219896149Do you think the Nazis were the first to classify racial differences? Do you think the Nazis were concerned with SEA-Monkeys?
>>219896146>In my country we would call her "Zigeuner""Zigeuner", "tsigane" or "gipsy" described various different kinds of wandering folk and is hardly even an ethic description, much less one of phenotypes.
>>219896198Wait till he finds out Hilter had no problem with Asians as a whole and broke his own rules to include the Japanese in his empire
>>219896179>>219896198At this point you guys must be outright trolling.Are your really too dumb to understand simple English sentences? Oh, wait ...
>>219896206except the word being coined 100 years ago when gypsy exclusively referred to mongrel eastern europeans with various threads of chinese/mongolian and distant ottoman genetics and also darker skinned jews would specifically be a racial descriptor
>>219896241You're the one saying Asian people are white, and it's actually a nazi-derived belief to think otherwise.And you don't even understand why that's not only funny, but also ironic.
Do your fucking job, tranny
thread is proof as to why "white supremacy" is incoherent and we should be WASP supremacists specifically
>>219896206It's used casually to refer to gypsies. Everyone has a very clear mental image of what they look like.
>>219896256>when gypsy exclusively referred to mongrel eastern europeansIt didn't. Not that that really matters.
>>219896092Either way, she's white according to the standards of whoever made this meme.
>>219896318it did, it referred to darker-than-white people who weren't visibly black or oriental, again brown, the term gypsy itself originally coming from a slur from "egyptian" because nobody actually cared where they were from, they just look like they were brown desert people probably and nobody wanted them around or cared enough to find out their specific genealogy not unlike saying 'brown"
>>219896347she'd be white if the had that skin color generally but completely different facial features, sure
>>219896403I've read colonial British accounts of India and they called the pajeets niggers. A lot of racial insults were broader back then.
>>219896457yes, like how gypsy referred to like 10 different "races" (or more accurately consistent sub-races of mixed-ethnicities from the eurasian area) Like you could call this girl a gypsy because she's part asian and part european and if this was 1937 her main thing would be getting fucked by her dad and trying to pickpocket people
>>219896403>it referred to darker-than-white peopleIt referred to nomadic people with a vaguely foreign tribal culture. Skin colour had nothing to do with it, even though the first "gypsies" that arrived in central Europe were indeed mostly oriental in origin. Usually they'd put on entertainment shows to make money - akin to what street musicians do today, though the performances were of a wider range of artistry and their live style would remind you of circus families nowadays. Either way, they stood out mainly because of that, not because of their ethnicity. In fact, if a European were to join them, he'd become a gypsy by association alone.
>>219896575>In fact, if a European were to join them, he'd become a gypsy by association alone.yes, by race-mixing with people who would consistently have darker hair, darker complexions, and darker eyes
>>219896640>by race-mixingThat's not what "race-mixing" means, anon.
>>219896735I'm sorry to tell you that your autistic dictionary definition isn't reflective of real lifeback then, people would've considered a englishman and a french woman to be "race mixing"
>>219897139>a englishman and a french womanJoining a circus troupe is not the same as fucking one of their members.
>>219897203are you kidding?I would say that even now, if you joined cirque du soleil, you'd be fucking someone else in the troupe within the week
Race is not just skin deep, being "white" is not just about skin colour, but facial features and skull structure.But in either case her skin isn't even white to begin with so we don't even need to go into the specifics of racial features
>>219897397there's no point, you're arguing with some kind of mutt euro who thinks because his hair isn't pitch black he's white, which warps his view of everyone else
>>219897259>if you joined cirque du soleil, you'd be fucking someone else in the troupe within the weekWell, thanks for the suggestion. I probably should do that then.
>>219897397>her skin isn't even white to begin withSee >>219896072
>>219897509anon asuka isn't white, if she's half japanese like the show says
Damn, mutts and browns get really pissed off and delusional when they realise they're not white like they've been lied to their whole life huh
>>219897568>asuka isn't whiteYou guys don't even understand your own racist memes. Hillarious.
>>219897636>thinks a half-asian girl is whiteDo you not understand reality?
>>219897654I repeat: You fail to understand your own memes. Or what that scale on that meme is meant to signify.
>>219897669>your own memesnot mine, retardand using that dumbass meme scale would mean that albino black are white because they're pale skinnedAnd you still think the half-SEAmonkey brown girl is white, by the way
>>219897698>not mineKek. "Yours" as in your group of race-obsessed morons. Not as in posted by you individually.
>>219897696Brown only has 79 matches.Guess that settles it.
>>219897725>race-obsessedremember when you started this argument by claiming to be the race expert based on your modern eurocuck sensibilities? oh and also "ancient greece" (where this little brown girl would've been dressed in a gold waist chain and deemed heathen concubine or whatever in the whorehouse she ended up in, regardless of where she's originally from)but now caring about race is totally beneath you and the brown girl being brown (even though you claimed she wasn't brown) doesn't actually even matterpic relayed to (you)
>>219897772>you started this argumentRight. Not as if the very first reply was "muh mystery meat" out of nowhere.
>>219897834actually, no againit was a post of a dog's face and pointing out the fact that the racist slytherin crew will be three white boys and a brown girl, and obvious implications of thatand you replied>umm, ackshually, that little brown girl is white by european standards and then you kept spazzing about americans and pulling your hair out whenever someone said she kind of looks like a mexican because you don't know what a mexican is
>>219897875>actually, noActually, yes. See the very first reply to this thread.>he fact that the racist slytherin crew will be three white boys and a brown girlOh, so you're the "muh joke" guy still. Should have guessed.
>>219897896you didn't reply to the very first post, eurocuckyou replied to the "three white boys and a brown girl" postI know that based on your posts in this thread, you've been awake for at least 20 hours, but you need to try to remember things that happened
When Rowling wrote the first book theUK was like 88-90% white British now it’s 74% white British
>>219897961>you didn't reply to the very first postSo you think just because no one replied at first until the thread got seriously derailed, that isn't where it all started?>you've been awake for at least 20 hoursNope. I've slept in between for a good seven to eight hours. Also went grocery shopping for a while.I told you before, I'm not the only one with some common sense in here. Besides, the thread seems to have slowed down quite a bit for about four or five hours before this post here: >>219889354.You really aren't very perceptive. As if there ever was a need for more evidence of that.
>>219895751>Pansy Parkinson is not even canonically defined as white,her name is Pansy Parkinson, she's from an upperclass British family and it's 1993 or whatever, she's whiteSorry that you needed this explained to you>while the actress most definitely is a white British girl.Pakistani girls are considered "white British girls" now, too, this doesn't prove anything
>>219898069>You aren't perceptive. By the way, I perceive this girl: >>219873246 as being white
>>219878145Fighting off the Russians in 17th century India? Yes, you are retarded.
>>219898072>her name is Pansy Parkinson, she's from an upperclass British family and it's 1993 or whatever, she's whiteThe actress' name is Laila Barwick. Not any less British a name. So by the same logic, she's white as well.
>>219898166>LailaThat's a weird way to spell Layla, and given that she's part South East Asian, it might even be pronounced "Lah-ee-Lah" or something, the same way that Moana is "Mo-AH-nah" and not just "Mona" spelled in a weird wayAnd it's also not early 90s.
>>219898205>That's a weird way to spell LaylaIs it? Besides, the last name is the British upper class indicator, if anything:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barwick_baronets>And it's also not early 90s.Aha. So what?
>>219898262>Is it?Yes.>Besides the last name is the British upper class indicator, if anythingSo you're saying her dad must've been the white one and her mom was the asian? How uncommon, but I digress. Regardless of the specifics, the result of the pairing not white.>Aha. So what?That a brown person would be less likely to have a white surname 30 years ago. You know that's two generations worth of births, right?I guess it's still kind of a new thing for you, maybe.
>>219898403>her dad must've been the white one and her mom was the asian?Just like Pansy Parkinson's parents, yeah. Isn't that how your logic works?>That a brown person would be less likely to have a white surname 30 years ago. You do know that most British "browns" and "mixed race children" are from the height of their colonial times, right? As in, way further back than 30 years ago. Oh, wait, you actually don't know shit about Britain.
>>219898541>Just like Pansy Parkinson's parents, yeah. Isn't that how your logic works?No, retard.Because it's not the 90s. It also wasn't the 90s 12/13 years ago when this girl was born, just in case you were wondering.It was the 90s thirty years ago.>You do know that most British "browns" and "mixed race children" are from the height of their colonial times, right?No. Most brown people in Britain WEREN'T there 30 years ago. That's kind of a big problem they've been struggling with, actually. I guess this must be a revelation for you, that all adult non-white people with crazy accents weren't born there, but well, the truth hurts.
>>219898661>Because it's not the 90s.You're really dying on that hill. Impressive.>No. Most brown people in Britain WEREN'T there 30 years ago.You really don't know shit about British history.>That's kind of a big problem they've been struggling with, actually. Kek. No. It's not. It's something right-wing parties made up to get people to vote for Brexit. Now, THAT is actually something Britain struggles with today.
>>219898714You're so autistic and mad you can't even understand reality anymore.You're behaving as if I'm saying there were non-whites in the UK ever, until recently.What I'm saying is, the influx within two decades of this current century dwarfs the entire previous century's worth of immigrants and refugees completely.There are more little brown children running around now than there were in 1993.If you disagree with that statement, you are retarded.
>>219898823>the influx within two decades of this current century dwarfs the entire previous century's worth of immigrants and refugees completely.It quite literally does not.
>>219899006yes it doesbut I guess maybe if you count pakis and arabs as white like (you) do, then the numbers might seem tenableAnd you've now admitted the half-asian brown girl playing Pansy isn't white, so good game
>>219899043>yes it doesYou keep insisting on things that you know literally nothing about, anon. Britain was a major colonial power. Most of its immigration is from its own Commonwealth. To this day. But more importantly, the height of imigration in all of Europe in the last century, not just Britain, was between 1945 and 1965, not during the buildup, but during the economic boom that followed. That's when a surplus of workers, preferrably cheap, was needed. And immigration was outright encouraged.Enough history lessons for you?