The only purpose this could serve is making the audience gasp at hearing the ancient mummified voice actors in surround sound.
>>219895135It's going to be grim
Julie Kavner's voice makes me sad.
>>219895135It'll be most AI generated for the voices at least
>>219895342It won't, because SAG-AFTRA made it illegal for any box office film to contain AI
>>219895135I watched a clip from the show for the first time in maybe a decade and a half. Marge really does sound like she's dying. I thought everyone was exaggerating but it was very harrowing to listen to.
>>219895390lol
>>219895342I seriously doubt that. Actors would be screeching from the rooftop and across bluesky if this had ai voice acting
>>219895390what a stupid rule.>don't use special effects, you're robbing honest tradespeople of their work!
>>219895390uhh based?
>>219895135Julie Kavner sounds like Mrs. Bouvier
>>219895539not really. nobody cared when disney did it for james earl jones
>>219895135Did the fortnite collab really drum up that much Simpson hype with gen As that they think this will actually make money?
>>219895135This is probably the last chance they'll have the show end in any way organically as opposed to being forced to pull the plug due to the death of a load-bearing voice actor.Naturally I doubt they'll do this.
>>219895641how does this shit even work any more?>it's Fortnite, in Magic: The Gathering!>it's Magic: The Gathering, in Fortnite!>Minecraft, in the new Mario movie?!what on earth is going on? is it like Touhou where people like the characters, but don't actually play the games...?
>>219895555I agree. Screeching troons online actually got something done. It'll be overturned within the next few years undoubtedly
>>219895685there was a recent episode called 'The Simpsons Finale' that was a big self-aware parody/dream episode ABOUT ever ending the show naturally. it even had another version of 'They'll Never Stop The Simpsons' at the end.it's like when comic books introduce parallel universes, resurrections, etc. there's basically nothing The Simpsons could do at this point. they ran out of ideas, they got postmodern/experimental, it's all awful.
>>219895135>hearing the ancient mummified voice actors in surround sound.Any clips? I saw some clips from the Y2K episode but that was a few years ago now.
Will Apu be in it?
who the fuck still watches this shit in the year 2026
>>219895641My 8 year old niece plays Fortnite and apparently she's been marathoning Simpsons so maybe actually.
>>219895978Mexicans and Central Americans
>>219896370Makes sense, Homer is a lazy fuck that doesn’t do his job and doesn’t support his children, they clearly see themselves there
>>219895978People who died with the TV on decades ago and no one knew.
>>219895978South Americans
It's gonna be woke
>>219896423scared of this happening to me, tbqh.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joyce_Vincentfeels like this wouldn't happen in 2026, though. you don't just get left alone, landlords and bailiffs move very quickly in the digital age.
>>219896564The Simpsons? No...
>>219896564the show has always been liberal-slanted satire
>>219896923Woke is a regression from 90s and 00s era liberalism
>>219895390Banned or need to license the voice? Kavner and the producers probably both would be happy for her to get paid for not speaking but giving her permission for an AI to speak for her. Kind of stupid if SAG forces an old woman to torture what's left of her vocal cords when there's a mutually beneficial solution available.
>>219896923what was their weird beef with nuclear energy, though?
>>219897105People didn't know better back then. Chernobyl only happened like 5 years prior, so it was the new boogieman
>>219896564How heavy handed do you really think it's going to be this time?
>>219895135did they really use a shitty ai background for their promo
>>219895135Google who owns the Simpsons.It's not Fox and it's not matt groening
>>219895342Obsessed "AI" losers are such mouth droolers. Have an original + coherent thought already.
>Obsessed "AI" losers are such mouth droolers. Have an original + coherent thought already.
>>219896370And aus
>>219895135They’re going to use the events of the movie as an opportunity to change the voices. Maybe some multiverse shenanigans. Since zombie Simpsons is always painfully late to the joke.
>>219898294just completely changing marge's voice would be less jarring for people who haven't seen the simpsons for awhile vs what they're gonna hear
>>219895135>NOW WITH EVEN MORE SHADING ON THE CHARACTERS
Looking back at the first movie, it's obvious they didn't know what to do with Lisa
>>219897040Banned because some environment bullshit
>>219895423A lot of the newer Simpsons' writing relies on 2020s high-tech gadgets in the 1990s world.
