How many red flags did Louie need to find out Jimmy was a pedophile?
Three.
It's obvious in the original interview that he knows and is trying to buddy up to him so that he might slip. He just had to do some damage control after it was publicly admitted.Also, all the royals are pedovores.
>>219958537I mean, we literally have pictures of the queen on the epstein cabin, also the naked kid jumping out of the window may or may not have been a stunt.
>>219958537How excuses are you going to give this lying pile of shit? You people are insufferable.
>>219958659.....what excuses??
>>219958493Jimmy called his bed "the altar" and Louie just stupidly stood there.
>>219958493i always ask this question but it often turns into political shit flinging; with all of these prolific offenders like Saville, Epstein, Weinstein, P. Diddy, Bill Cosby, Spacey (debatably), and all of the dozens of others that have had their behavior come to light, what changes? They clearly behave like this for years, often decades, and have reputations for their behavior extend well beyond the entertainment industry. For years, no one, in an industry filled with people who love to lecture the average person about the evil of their beliefs, viewpoints, and actions, comes out to condemn these people until... suddenly they do. My question is why? Do the number of accusers just reach critical mass? Do their handlers just decide they're not wanted anymore? I'm seriously curious because it never makes sense to me.
>>219959132Everyone in power anywhere is compromised, meaning that the power brokers have dirt on them. If they don't have dirt on you, you can't get into power anywhere. When you don't play ball with the Agenda, they might outright kill you, they might accuse you of things without proof, they might accuse you with proof, etc. But being compromised means that they always win in the end. The cases of this that you note are either people that didn't play ball and were destroyed for it, or those that were punished, corrected their actions, and were allowed back in. Except, Epstein. He was a power broker who became too well-known, so he was extracted back to Israel, obviously.
>>219959132Savile was extremely litigious and would set his "legal eagles" on anyone who accused without solid proof.
>>219959277believe it or not, that makes the most sense to me. you have well known figures who are compromised; their behavior is known to powerful interests who use it as leverage to keep them in check and help them... but how and why? and why would they suddenly decide to scuttle their reputations? because they suddenly decided, after years, to stand up to their handlers? did they simply outlive their usefulness?
>>219958807Louie literally asked him to his face if he is a pedo
>>219959429If we go down this conspiracy route, I can understand why the Powers That Be would keep Epstein, Weinstein, and even Cosby as controlled assets, because they were all influential in their own ways. But why Savile? Opinion turned against him decades before his death, as the rumours spreading quickly among ordinary people. He gave a bad name to any organisation he was part of. The time to drop him would have been around 1980.
>>219959429Good and evil both objectively exist. Good can act overtly because it doesn't have any fear that others will oppose it since everyone wants to be the recipient of goodness. But evil has to act covertly because if it acted overtly it would be opposed, since people do not want to be the recipients of evil.Cooperation is more effective than acting alone. The global cabal as a group is both evil and cooperative. Since they are evil, they are all necessarily vulnerable to public exposure of that evil. Since they are cooperative, it means that the other people with whom they cooperate have the power to expose them. This creates the necessity for a control mechanism within the cabal.That control mechanism is public exposure. Of course they are careful never to expose the cabal itself, but only the individual members, when exposure is necessary. Also, they recruit, and you don't have to be evil to join, but you have to be compromised. As a member of the public, the exposures you see are the result of this process. Think of it as attempts to correct their members be reminding them of who is in charge. It's usually only necessarily when their heads get too big, so to speak.At this point, no public figure actually has the power to damage the cabal. Those that try are killed. The shit you see is just corrective.
>>219959580Saville probably had the goods on someone extremely important and a credible dead man's switch set up.
FUCK. It's SaviLe, with a single L.Savile.
It was nice of 28 Years Later to rehabilitate Saville's image, we are all Jimmy now
>>219960423Rehabilitates him by making him a self-professed satanist? I don't follow your line of thinking.Maybe you mean that part where he dances to the "The Number of the Beast." I don't think anyone came away from that thinking, Wow, Jimmy Savile is cool now! You might not know this, but "beast" is another word for a pedo in the UK, and the song only reinforced an existing perception.
>>219960591Do you not parkour? Sad.
>>219959132A lot of people are willing to look the other way to keep their jobs. It's usually hearing rumors or murmurs of things, but never outright seeing it. Things like this often get discussed quietly and privately. And without solid proof, why would you speak out against them? Even when people tried speaking out, they were often silenced and swept under the rug in court.What changed is social media made it easy for people to speak out to a wide audience. Seeing one person speak out, let others feel more comfortable coming forward with their own stories. Before, many people would feel alone and overwhelmed about speaking out against people in power. So much shit happened in Hollywood for years that once one person started getting traction, a bunch of others followed suit. This was a good thing.What happened afterwards is that it became weaponized and monetized. People tried to "cancel" anyone over minor allegations. Media companies publish and promote that shit because it gets attention. How many times have you never heard of a creator in a small community until allegations are made against them? All the minor accusations and press hype, is making it difficult or legitimate allegations to be taken as seriously as they need to be.
>>219959132loss of their livelihood. no one wants to be the one to stop the gravy train, especially the one that stops at their station.
>>219958493>now then now then boys and girls
>>219958537Eva Dubin was literally emailing Epsteen about her 15yo daughter had 5 of her friends around to get him to come over.
