Does Euphoria glorify degeneracy?
>>219979024It tries to rationalize degeneracy, it's such a destructive program.
It glorifies sex with mixed girls and cute trannies
>portrays degeneracy as bad>retards think portraying something is the same as glorifying itClassic midwit filter
>>219979024Dunno, I'm not watching that crap.
I hated this show until I actually watched it>>219979153 is correct, it unequivocally shows degeneracy as a bad thing
>>219979024America glorifies degeneracy in general
>>219979024Do zoomers not know about Skins?
>>219979024I think it glorifies bad writing and cheap gimmicks that only appeal to teenagers, which is much more insulting to your intelligence than "degeneracy."
>>219979024Sam Levinson is jewish, next question.
I don't like Zendaya but I'd happily spit roast her with Hunter.
>>219979153Men can hold that discernment, women see it and consider it amongst the norm
I won't watch this slop. Hunter needs to post more.
>>219979024You don't HAVE to be a zoomer or a tranny to watch this show, but it helps!
Is hunter a bisexual or is he dick only?
>>219979024>takes israeli show, and ramps it up to 11and israel is the gayest country on earth
>>219979454SHE is a queen, and she will do whatever she wants
>>219979160Moments before I kiss her and we rub our boners
>>219979451I am a millennial zoomer-tranny fucker
Define glorify.Define degeneracy.
>>219979582That cute tongue on the tip...Hunter's, not the Mexican.
Episode 3 will mindbreak and coombreak /tv/
>>219979680/tv/ is ready for full frontal gock
No clue.Does Zendaya ever get naked in it? If she does, I might watch it and tell you afterwards.
>>219979153>>219979210Yeah, no, that excuse doesn't work. It's the Cuties defense. >guys we're sexualizing children in order to demonstrate why it's bad to sexualize childrenA show full of degeneracy/pornography doesn't get a pass because it claims it's trying to show that they're bad. If the creators truly believed these things were bad, they wouldn't be showing them on screen.
>>219979729closest she got, she strikes me as a never nude type of actress
>>219979729Shut the fuck up, Chevrolet.
>>219979747Well. Nevermind, then.
>>219979714i-i'm not ready...
>>219979024No idea because i will never watch this shitty show
>>219979747Why are her nipples always so hard?
>>219979729Who cares about that goblin. If Hunter doesn't whip it out next episode, I'm cancelling my HBO subscription. HEAR THAT, TIME WARNER?!
>>219979868she's a lesbian and she gets turned on by those strippers, it's called acting
>>219979024I don't care/am glad about them glorifying sex. Body count dipshits are the reason why no girls will have sex with you. However I really dislike how they portray drugs as something interesting or that could be helpful in any way. I think that should be illegal. That's what the big controversy should be about. But due to the mainstream being jealous perverts with creepy pedophilic tendencies of course the conversation is all about the sex.
>>219979747does he beat the shit out of her?
>>219979893because it's easy enough to simply not do drugs.It's a lot harder to find a girl that isn't a town bike.
>>219979024did he step on poop?
>>219979500I thought he got the dickchop?
>>219979024Yes it's open pornography and you have to be blind to not see. But honestly who cares fuck women, trannies and simps they can be treated like paintings for all I care
>>219979736Cuties was bad because it used actors who were like 13 irlEvery actor in Euphoria was in their 20s in season 1Do you also think Breaking Bad was glorifying meth addicts?
lost
>>219979736>If the creators truly believed these things were bad, they wouldn't be showing them on screenBrown subhumans like you have ruined this board
>>219979893mdma is actually good for you >t. formerly depressed sexless chud
>>219979893When does it portray drugs as interesting or useful? Everyone who is involved with drugs in the show is a massive loser that is hated by their friends and family
>>219979969I guarantee I'm whiter than you, and if you were criticizing my grammar you're a retard because there was nothing wrong with it.
>>219980134I know you’re brown because only an 80 IQ third worlder could have such a stunning lack of media literacy
>>219980134>already getting defensive over grammar even though no one mentioned itInsecure ESL spotted
>>219979736>If the creators truly believed these things were bad, they wouldn't be showing them on screenHahahahaha holy fuck have you never seen a movie before?
>>219979955>Do you also think Breaking Bad was glorifying meth addicts?Not him, but it was indirectly. Actions such as portrayals in media sometimes have unintentional consquences because not every human being is as consciousness as every other.
>>219980036In literally the first episode the main character talks about how various drugs were extremely helpful for her issues like ocd - pharma drugs are often just as bad as illegal ones. In the second episode she literally says "I know you're not supposed to say it, but drugs are kind of cool!" followed by a pleasant dreamlike/lesbian type experience. She's clearly not intended to be a loser and if she is she's one that people could see themselves as. This gives the producers content to work with, but at the expense of normalizing drug use among young people, especially among the vulnerable. Breaking Bad was objectionable enough, this is really insidious.
What is Euphoria? Just 90210 on cable and with troons?
>>219982655the show that makes chuddies cry
>>219979024yeah no shit
>>219979736and the Cuties defence was also correctit was Redditor outrage and mods malding about it only proved that it was Redditor outrage, janniesand mods are all pathetic rejects from there who sit in thei discrod server and think about how can they destroy site culture
>>219979298>>219979472>goys do drugs and have sex because a TV so said toLmao pathetic race
>>219980856>the main character said it, so that means the show runner believes it and wants the audience to believe it too!
>>219979024I don't even understand this question.
>>2199852492.25 seasons in and if you haven't figured out Rue is the bad guy then you're ngmi
>>219984211>thinking regular people do whatever tv tells them to dotv is always a few years behind what regular people are doing
>>219979024Reminds me of the discussion around Cuties.120 minutes of children twerking, but the moral of the movie is that it's LE BAD, so that makes all the twerk footage OK
Any good new ass shots of Hunter?
>>219984211>I was homeschooled, I don't go outside, and I don't have any friends
>>219985707Come back to /tv/ Sunday night
>>219985707no, but check this shit out
It's the tried and trusted tv formula to have everything more outrageous than ever seen on tv before: usually sexually has the biggest effect but also drug use and violence. Back in the 80s Baywatch was enough to cause consternation from the Karens and religious puritans of the time. In the 90s the likes of NYPD for example that scene with the nude woman and the boy seeing her, and just relationships in general. Sex and the City came in the late 1990s and was clearly intended to shock like never before. And these would all inspired newspaper articles on the decadence of society. They were a big thing at the time. But then it seemed like that was about it, that tv couldn't really get any more degenerate without going completely against guidelines. But there was one last twist in it - those guidelines didn't apply to cable. After the Sopranos success it began to be realized that cable tv like HBO could make quality megabudget tv that would appeal to the masses and it could have gratuitous sex and violence etc. - and man did Game of Thrones indulge itself in all of this. Rampant nudity, bdsm, literal sex and pornography on screen, at least softcore. Spartacus later also had obscene sex scenes. So again you could be forgiven for thinking that was the end of it, noone could do something more shocking than all that. Like it would be unimaginable how they could push the limits further than that. And yet... they somehow managed to do it. How is it physically possible to shock the public morality more than that?! uhh... I'll leave that for you to find out.
NYPD Blue*
