I just simply will not watch, which is the one thing no one did.

>>220012287
I just saw it in imax. If you liked him and his music, you’ll probably like it.

File: Screenshot_20260424-15263(...).png (482 KB, 1080x790)

482 KB PNG

The people are always right.

>>220012287
I browsed around a camrip.
It looks boring. None of the scenes do anything to grab your attention.

>>220012287
on the right side of your screen you have people who maintain that mj was as innocent as they come (pedos), on the left you have jews (pedos)
lose lose

>>220012287
Even if he wasn't a pedophile the whole arrested development shtick into his 50s was creepy as hell

Journos are never right.

It's a movie that tries to pretend the '93 to present day timeline doesn't exist. I think it will be a mega hit in the 3rd world countries that still worship him today.

>>220012287
Whichever side is lower

>>220012287
Whats the point if it doesn't show any of his downfall?

>>220012765
They were unable to depict the events of 1993. They filmed everything and then later discovered the settlement for the case prevented them from showing anything related to Jordan Chandler. It's not like they really had a choice. It was a better decision to just bite the bullet and remove all that stuff after they already spent so much money on the movie.

>>220012956
>believing this at all
The estate was never going to allow anything related to the diddling accusations to be filmed

>>220012287
Average the two scores to account for bias. If the score’s still around 50%, then it’s at least decent.

>>220013020
It's a fact and has been independently reported

Do people even give a shit about film critics after the 2010s? It’s all agendas and politics

File: Screen Shot 2026-04-24 at(...).png (75 KB, 755x275)

75 KB PNG

It's no Melania, but it's still a classic

>>220013461
lmao