If you don't like Avatar, you ARE a faggot.
>>220014622I'm indifferent to Avatar. May I remain straight?
what is Eywas position on sodomy?
>>220015375Death penalty.
>>220014622Gays in power within Hollywood, or crossdressers who left their small towns for a city apartment?
>>220014622This guy is a midwit, he spun the "pro-ballet" talk as some "Hollywood eats its own" -- cos disagreeing with Chalamay is not allowed? The classic works and medium inform later arts, how's this controversial except to GOLDFISH MEMORY?
>>220015570Ballet served its purpose, but is completely outdated and irrelevant now, as movies as we know them will be too when AI gets good enough at churning them out perfectly tailored on an individual basis on all fronts
>>220014622Gays haven't been culturally important since the 70s.
>>220015292No, off to the gay mines you go
>>220015292>I'm indifferent to Avatar.Same, really just don't give a shit about it.
>>220016130>Ballet served its purpose, but is completely outdated and irrelevant now,It was never for the popular masses.
Literally a sketch 16 years ago
>>220016319You say that because they've normalised. Normalisation doesn't make them any less culturally important. If anything it's much worse now.
He's right but worded it poorly. The reason Avatar has no cultural impact is because its deliberately designed to be culturally devoid for mass appeal. Its meant to appeal just as much to China as to America. This makes it lack any real cultural soul
>>220016468No I say that because we don't have fags like Elton John, Freddy Mercury, Charles Nelson Reilly, and Paul Lynde.
>>220014622It's time to Make Fags Fly and watch Avatar
>>220014622even gay retards can see avatar has no cultural impactshilltrannys btfo
>>220016691>but i'm on your siiiiide *splat*
>>220014622>gays don't like a movie where the protagonist is happily married with the mother of his childrencolor me fucking surprised
>>220016723you're on the same side of the aisle as gays. ponder that.
>>220014622IDK about the gay thing but it´s true that Avatar has had no cultural impact, neither did the new Planet of the apes movies or Dunc. There may be some value to helping evolve motion capture into performance capture but since traditional animation is still better not all that much.Sadly these flicks are not all that different from capeshit. There is no artistic cinematographic value to them, they are just part of a period of time defined by the depersonalized low risk milking of established IPs. Most Hollywood movies of the past decade are in the same bag though so there is no reason to be particularly upset about it. If you want to be upset about something it should be about how contemporary culture measurement metric of cultural produce has now been reduced to how many millions it makes at the box office.
>>220017148>There is no artistic cinematographic value to themYour post is bait.
>>220016691Is he okay?
>>220017027a broken clock is right twice a day
Gays haven’t had any cultural impact in 20 years
>>220016468No, they’re mainstream and they aren’t tastemakers or remotely hip anymore. What’s the last trend they were at the forefront of or art they championed?
>>220014622>Bland characters>Bland worldbuilding>Bland dialogue>Bland acting>Bland musicThat’s why Avatar has no cultural impact. The movies are three hour sensory experiences.
>>220017549>>Bland worldbuilding>>Bland music
>>220016739Israel is the homo homeland.
>>220014622I’ve been saying this for years
