[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: invincible if good.webm (3.74 MB, 720x854)
3.74 MB
3.74 MB WEBM
It's over.
>>
rtx on
>>
looks good. what's the problem?
>>
>>220039386
You can call me a jeet (I'm not) but I think bottom looks better.
>>
>conquest has lighting coming from his left
>mark and oliver, while facing him, also have lighting coming from their left

saar pls do the needful and fix saar
>>
>>220039386
This is why "artists" hate AI
>>
>>220039386
the one where he fucks them all to death is the best one
>>
>>220039458
that looks cool though
>>
>>220039386
So what is it? Did they use CG to do this or AI or what?
I don't watch this shit I just want to know what are the implications for 2d animation
>>
What did they erase the first season with this AI shit or is it a fan thing?
>>
>>220039736
fan made thing
>>
>>220039572
>that looks cool though
And you shit on the street.
>>
>>220039386
the bottom looks terrible
>>
>>220039386
That scene with Nolan looking up has that uncanny disjointed AI face look and I don't like it but everything else looks fantastic. If this isn't AI they should just hire him and give him a fat Amazon paycheck. Just one guy who does only one thing: shading the frames.

I know it's just 4 guys but goddamn, is it really that much work to just add some very basic and semi-correct lighting to give some semblance of depth? Probably takes 2 minutes per frame MAX for a pro artist…I noticed in the compromise with Thragg over Earth that the show actually looked good for once. I'm convinced they added some fixes to that episode at the last second after all the sudden backlash for how shitty and flat their animation looks
>>
>>220039922
Crazy how you people get this fired up over basically nothing, can't be healthy. And you'll only double down too no matter what anyone replies. Too common here
>>
>>220039972
He's just terminally online. Bottom is a massive improvement, and even if the lighting isn't 1000% accurate to the directions of light in reality, it still separates the characters from the background and adds a 3D illusion which is a big part of why this show looks like garbage even on static frames. For the most part, only major fight scenes get lighting
>>
>>220039386
Wow you polished a turd!
>>
>>220039386
Only the first shot actually looks better.
>>
>>220039972
GOOD MORNING SAAR
>>
File: file.png (1.33 MB, 1190x1284)
1.33 MB
1.33 MB PNG
>>220040075
He's just retarded. Conquest gets lit directly from the back so he has highlights all around, Mark is lit entirely from the front so he also has highlight all around since the camera is behind him. He's just not fully in the shot
>>
>>220039386
They both look terrible.
>>
>>220040194
The point is one looks better mr. demoralizer
>>
>>220040165
>MOOOOOOOM IM THINKING ABOUT INDANS AGAIN
>>
>>220040194
Top looks terrible and bottom looks incredible, you are being a contrarian for attention. My only complaint is bottom looks a little overly dark
>>
>>220039434
"After" is fan-made
>>
>>220039458
>>220039922
Nta but lmfao are you really defending this shows shitty ass art/animation? Why? Are you that much of a contrarian or do you work for Amazon?
>>
>>220039386
Cool.
>>
>>220039386
I hate how flat this show looks, bottom is better
>>
If the whole show was like this it would make me completely forget how cringe some of the dialogue is during filler scenes like Eve's
>>
>>220040370
the "PTSD flashback" while eve was telling mark how he killed their kid was fucking comical
>>
>>220040248
We get it you eat cow dung
>>
>>220039386
AI truly is king
>>
File: 1439325459942.jpg (25 KB, 306x306)
25 KB
25 KB JPG
>>220039386
>capeslop
>>
>>220039386
Yeah... but if they spend the budget on animation and shading, what would be left for celebrity voice actors?
>>
>>220039386
>sweetfx
>>
post-processing will never fix westoid shit being fundamentally terrible
>>
>>220039386
What a difference a little rim lighting makes.
>>
>>220039972
he's probably a Trump supporter.
>>
>>220039458
>retard doesn't know how lighting works
Stop embarassing yourself
>>
File: IMG_1827.png (1.81 MB, 1080x1284)
1.81 MB
1.81 MB PNG
>>220039451
Perhaps at first glance, but once you get used to it it’s eye rape.
>>
File: csm reze bts 2.webm (3.9 MB, 956x800)
3.9 MB
3.9 MB WEBM
>>220041515
there's good and bad ways to do it, and your example is bad because bottom is CGI
>>
>>220039386
good in space scene others it looks like when they spill water all over the ground in game mods for "graphiks!"
>>
File: 1776916597739954.webm (1.89 MB, 380x222)
1.89 MB
1.89 MB WEBM
>>
>>220041547
No? the bottom is 2d
>>
>>220041515
That's a completely different art style, not really applicable to the Invincible situation.
>>
>>220039386
amazing how troons have to convince themselves that the bottom somehow looks worse because AI is... LE BAD!
>>
File: IMG_1828.gif (938 KB, 500x281)
938 KB
938 KB GIF
>>220041547
Is that supposed to be good animation? It looks like a Shaft seasonal anime in the mid 2010s. I thought that movie was a theatrical release?
>>
File: CSM BTS.webm (3.84 MB, 900x752)
3.84 MB
3.84 MB WEBM
>>220041722
Yeah, it did really well. But you already know all of this.
>>
>>220039386
>Okay RetardAI, increase contrast by 500% and add random black bars to the frame!
>>
>>220041803
I don’t actually. But I’m sure it did. Cunslaw Mang is pretty popular. I’m just saying it’s not particularly well animated based on the webms you posted. I’ve not watched anime in 6 or 7 years.
>>
>>220039386
SOUL vs SOULLESS
>>
>>220041515
top of this mogs the top of invincible though. its not a good comparison
>>
>>220039386
I actually don't mind AI being used like this
>>
File: 1774788144662583.jpg (650 KB, 1525x1946)
650 KB
650 KB JPG
>>220041937
>cheap slop is soul now
>>
>>220041620
kino...
>>
>>220039386
It's too overdone. I can agree that it can work better for the space scenes but the AI is too garish overall.
>>
>>220039386
But does this fix the absolute garbage story and characters after season 1?
>>
>>220039386
It looks good. I don't really care whether it's AI or not despite disliking most applications of AI; Invincible has always had an incredibly flat, lifeless art style.
>>
I'm usually a stickler for these thing and notice glaring animation issues, but little of most of Season 3, I think this show looks good. I don't like the OP bottom. It just gives it a different tone and style.
>>
>>220039386
Tranime watchers have 0 fucking taste who knew
>>
>>220039386
top has not enough shadows
bottom has too many shadows
>>
>>220039386
>look at these 2 second clips I stitched together! this is how good Incredible COULD look!
okay now do it for 1 hour 32 times.
>>
>>220039386
I read an article that Amazon excepts the level of animation "after" but by jewing the entire thing with like four animators and pumping everything in marketing, VAs and goyllectibles.
>>
>>220043590
*invincible
>>
>>220039386
>Doesn't fix the stiff shitty animation
>>
>>220042878
that's the only things that carry the show though
>>
>>220041900
no its incredibly well animated theres a reason it did so well, the bit where she bites his tongue off, and the bit where she throws her own severed head through a window to kill everyone is a really well shot scene, you should watch the movie its great
>>
>>220039386
What is, you dumb street-shitting retard? Nobody will ever be impressed by your 5 second slop videos.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.