This is kino compared to whatever that slop was we got last year.
>>220042958Two things can both be shit anon, although I’d take Gunn retardation over Snyder slop
>>220042958Snyder is the only reason Gunn's reboot attempt didn't do better.
>>220042958Snyders a pseud but that's still more intellectual than what the current crop of browns and women are capable of
>>220042958>wow pretty visuals!>never mind the shit writing thoughIt is still better than the new superman though, I'll give you that. But the Reeves movie is still the only good superman film.
So what's the symbolism about? Did Death want to take Superman in Man of Steel, while in Batman v Superman, Death respects him?
>>220042958Woah so deep, Saar! Unlike your 10.24cm when you're fucking a cow.
>>220042958>this turd is less stinky than this other turdok
Watch more movies, dude.
>>220042958the snyder cut truly is the best NPC litmus test
>>220044691The weight of expectations, duh.
>>220044691The first image is shown when Superman is faced with the idea of joining Zod, and what that will mean for humanity. So right there he is seeing what will happen to people if join Zod, or fail to stop Zod.The second image is shown while you've talking heads arguing about the importance of Superman to the world and the influence he exerts. So right there he is seeing the expectations and hopes that people place on him. So the overall theme is anxiety over what to do, and to do it right. Because lives are at stake.
>>220044749Gunnjeets trying to pass the buck to Snyderchads will never not be funny
>>220042958This imagery surely conveys the correct tone for a Superman movie. It doesn't make it look like the director and writer is a tone-deaf tryhard at all.
>>220045589Have you ever read a Superman comic, to know what's proper or not?
>>220044758it's true, you know..probably
>>220042958>was we got last yearholy pajeet
